* [PATCH v5 1/5] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq [not found] <20140820092458.27076.30955.stgit@tkhai> @ 2014-08-20 9:47 ` Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 18:45 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Add wrapper for checking task_struct:: on_rq tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state Kirill Tkhai ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Oleg Nesterov, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith, Kirill Tkhai, Tim Chen, Ingo Molnar, Nicolas Pitre Implement task_on_rq_queued() and use it everywhere instead of on_rq check. No functional changes. The only exception is we do not use the wrapper in check_for_tasks(), because it requires to export task_on_rq_queued() in global header files. Next patch in series would return it back, so we do not twist it from here to there. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 15 ++++---- kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++------ kernel/sched/rt.c | 16 ++++----- kernel/sched/sched.h | 7 ++++ kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 2 + 6 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 900bae8..1276ba2 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update. */ - if (rq->curr->on_rq && test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr)) + if (task_on_rq_queued(rq->curr) && test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr)) rq->skip_clock_update = 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu) static void __migrate_swap_task(struct task_struct *p, int cpu) { - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq; src_rq = task_rq(p); @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data); unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state) { unsigned long flags; - int running, on_rq; + int running, queued; unsigned long ncsw; struct rq *rq; @@ -1236,7 +1236,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state) rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); trace_sched_wait_task(p); running = task_running(rq, p); - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); ncsw = 0; if (!match_state || p->state == match_state) ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */ @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state) * running right now), it's preempted, and we should * yield - it could be a while. */ - if (unlikely(on_rq)) { + if (unlikely(queued)) { ktime_t to = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ); set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) static void ttwu_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags) { activate_task(rq, p, en_flags); - p->on_rq = 1; + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; /* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */ if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) @@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ static int ttwu_remote(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags) int ret = 0; rq = __task_rq_lock(p); - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { /* check_preempt_curr() may use rq clock */ update_rq_clock(rq); ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags); @@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) success = 1; /* we're going to change ->state */ cpu = task_cpu(p); - if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) goto stat; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -1726,7 +1726,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p) if (!(p->state & TASK_NORMAL)) goto out; - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP); ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0); @@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p) init_task_runnable_average(p); rq = __task_rq_lock(p); activate_task(rq, p, 0); - p->on_rq = 1; + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, true); check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -2428,7 +2428,7 @@ static u64 do_task_delta_exec(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq) * project cycles that may never be accounted to this * thread, breaking clock_gettime(). */ - if (task_current(rq, p) && p->on_rq) { + if (task_current(rq, p) && task_on_rq_queued(p)) { update_rq_clock(rq); ns = rq_clock_task(rq) - p->se.exec_start; if ((s64)ns < 0) @@ -2474,7 +2474,7 @@ unsigned long long task_sched_runtime(struct task_struct *p) * If we see ->on_cpu without ->on_rq, the task is leaving, and has * been accounted, so we're correct here as well. */ - if (!p->on_cpu || !p->on_rq) + if (!p->on_cpu || !task_on_rq_queued(p)) return p->se.sum_exec_runtime; #endif @@ -2778,7 +2778,7 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void) switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; } - if (prev->on_rq || rq->skip_clock_update < 0) + if (task_on_rq_queued(prev) || rq->skip_clock_update < 0) update_rq_clock(rq); next = pick_next_task(rq, prev); @@ -2943,7 +2943,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function); */ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) { - int oldprio, on_rq, running, enqueue_flag = 0; + int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag = 0; struct rq *rq; const struct sched_class *prev_class; @@ -2972,9 +2972,9 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio); oldprio = p->prio; prev_class = p->sched_class; - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); running = task_current(rq, p); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); if (running) p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p); @@ -3014,7 +3014,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, p, enqueue_flag); check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio); @@ -3025,7 +3025,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) { - int old_prio, delta, on_rq; + int old_prio, delta, queued; unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; @@ -3046,8 +3046,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice); goto out_unlock; } - on_rq = p->on_rq; - if (on_rq) + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice); @@ -3056,7 +3056,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) p->prio = effective_prio(p); delta = p->prio - old_prio; - if (on_rq) { + if (queued) { enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); /* * If the task increased its priority or is running and @@ -3328,7 +3328,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, { int newprio = dl_policy(attr->sched_policy) ? MAX_DL_PRIO - 1 : MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 - attr->sched_priority; - int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, on_rq, running; + int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, queued, running; int policy = attr->sched_policy; unsigned long flags; const struct sched_class *prev_class; @@ -3525,9 +3525,9 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, return 0; } - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); running = task_current(rq, p); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); if (running) p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p); @@ -3537,7 +3537,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) { + if (queued) { /* * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is * increased (user space view). @@ -4552,7 +4552,7 @@ void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu) rcu_read_unlock(); rq->curr = rq->idle = idle; - idle->on_rq = 1; + idle->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) idle->on_cpu = 1; #endif @@ -4629,7 +4629,7 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask) goto out; dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, new_mask); - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu }; /* Need help from migration thread: drop lock and wait. */ task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags); @@ -4679,7 +4679,7 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu) * If we're not on a rq, the next wake-up will ensure we're * placed properly. */ - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { dequeue_task(rq_src, p, 0); set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu); enqueue_task(rq_dest, p, 0); @@ -4720,13 +4720,13 @@ void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid) { struct rq *rq; unsigned long flags; - bool on_rq, running; + bool queued, running; rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); running = task_current(rq, p); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); if (running) p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p); @@ -4735,7 +4735,7 @@ void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid) if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags); } @@ -7100,13 +7100,13 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) .sched_policy = SCHED_NORMAL, }; int old_prio = p->prio; - int on_rq; + int queued; - on_rq = p->on_rq; - if (on_rq) + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); __setscheduler(rq, p, &attr); - if (on_rq) { + if (queued) { enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); resched_curr(rq); } @@ -7293,16 +7293,16 @@ void sched_offline_group(struct task_group *tg) void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) { struct task_group *tg; - int on_rq, running; + int queued, running; unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; rq = task_rq_lock(tsk, &flags); running = task_current(rq, tsk); - on_rq = tsk->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(tsk); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0); if (unlikely(running)) tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk); @@ -7315,14 +7315,14 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED if (tsk->sched_class->task_move_group) - tsk->sched_class->task_move_group(tsk, on_rq); + tsk->sched_class->task_move_group(tsk, queued); else #endif set_task_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk)); if (unlikely(running)) tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, tsk, 0); task_rq_unlock(rq, tsk, &flags); diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 255ce13..d21a8e0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) update_rq_clock(rq); dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH); if (task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr)) check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0); @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to * re-start task selection. */ - if (rq->stop && rq->stop->on_rq) + if (rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)) return RETRY_TASK; } @@ -1257,7 +1257,8 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq || !cpumask_test_cpu(later_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) || - task_running(rq, task) || !task->on_rq)) { + task_running(rq, task) || + !task_on_rq_queued(task))) { double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq); later_rq = NULL; break; @@ -1296,7 +1297,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq) BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); - BUG_ON(!p->on_rq); + BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); BUG_ON(!dl_task(p)); return p; @@ -1443,7 +1444,7 @@ static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq) dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, this_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr))) { WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr); - WARN_ON(!p->on_rq); + WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); /* * Then we pull iff p has actually an earlier @@ -1596,7 +1597,7 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) if (unlikely(p->dl.dl_throttled)) return; - if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p)) /* Only reschedule if pushing failed */ @@ -1614,7 +1615,7 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (p->on_rq || rq->curr == p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* * This might be too much, but unfortunately diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index bc37bb9..9e6ca0d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -7494,7 +7494,7 @@ static void task_fork_fair(struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; /* @@ -7519,11 +7519,11 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will * do the right thing. * - * If it's on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already - * have normalized the vruntime, if it's !on_rq, then only when + * If it's queued, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already + * have normalized the vruntime, if it's !queued, then only when * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime. */ - if (!p->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING) { + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->state != TASK_RUNNING) { /* * Fix up our vruntime so that the current sleep doesn't * cause 'unlimited' sleep bonus. @@ -7558,7 +7558,7 @@ static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) */ se->depth = se->parent ? se->parent->depth + 1 : 0; #endif - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; /* @@ -7604,7 +7604,7 @@ void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) } #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED -static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) +static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int queued) { struct sched_entity *se = &p->se; struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; @@ -7623,7 +7623,7 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares. */ /* - * When !on_rq, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized. + * When !queued, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized. * But there are some cases where it has already been normalized: * * - Moving a forked child which is waiting for being woken up by @@ -7634,14 +7634,14 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) * To prevent boost or penalty in the new cfs_rq caused by delta * min_vruntime between the two cfs_rqs, we skip vruntime adjustment. */ - if (!on_rq && (!se->sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING)) - on_rq = 1; + if (!queued && (!se->sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING)) + queued = 1; - if (!on_rq) + if (!queued) se->vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(se)->min_vruntime; set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p)); se->depth = se->parent ? se->parent->depth + 1 : 0; - if (!on_rq) { + if (!queued) { cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index 5f6edca..4feac8f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) * means a dl or stop task can slip in, in which case we need * to re-start task selection. */ - if (unlikely((rq->stop && rq->stop->on_rq) || + if (unlikely((rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)) || rq->dl.dl_nr_running)) return RETRY_TASK; } @@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(task)) || task_running(rq, task) || - !task->on_rq)) { + !task_on_rq_queued(task))) { double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq); lowest_rq = NULL; @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq) BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); - BUG_ON(!p->on_rq); + BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); return p; @@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) */ if (p && (p->prio < this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)) { WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr); - WARN_ON(!p->on_rq); + WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); /* * There's a chance that p is higher in priority @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct task_struct *p, BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; weight = cpumask_weight(new_mask); @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * we may need to handle the pulling of RT tasks * now. */ - if (!p->on_rq || rq->rt.rt_nr_running) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->rt.rt_nr_running) return; if (pull_rt_task(rq)) @@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * If that current running task is also an RT task * then see if we can move to another run queue. */ - if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->rt.overloaded && /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */ @@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; if (rq->curr == p) { diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 4c2b87f..26566d0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ struct rq; +/* task_struct::on_rq states: */ +#define TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED 1 + extern __read_mostly int scheduler_running; extern unsigned long calc_load_update; @@ -942,6 +945,10 @@ static inline int task_running(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) #endif } +static inline int task_on_rq_queued(struct task_struct *p) +{ + return p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; +} #ifndef prepare_arch_switch # define prepare_arch_switch(next) do { } while (0) diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c index bfe0eda..67426e5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c +++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) { struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop; - if (!stop || !stop->on_rq) + if (!stop || !task_on_rq_queued(stop)) return NULL; put_prev_task(rq, prev); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched: Add wrapper for checking task_struct:: on_rq 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:45 ` tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: linux-kernel, ktkhai, hpa, mingo, torvalds, pjt, peterz, nicolas.pitre, tim.c.chen, umgwanakikbuti, rostedt, tkhai, tglx, oleg Commit-ID: da0c1e65b51a289540159663aa4b90ba2366bc21 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/da0c1e65b51a289540159663aa4b90ba2366bc21 Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:47:32 +0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:52:59 +0200 sched: Add wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Implement task_on_rq_queued() and use it everywhere instead of on_rq check. No functional changes. The only exception is we do not use the wrapper in check_for_tasks(), because it requires to export task_on_rq_queued() in global header files. Next patch in series would return it back, so we do not twist it from here to there. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408528052.23412.87.camel@tkhai Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ kernel/sched/deadline.c | 15 ++++----- kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++------- kernel/sched/rt.c | 16 +++++----- kernel/sched/sched.h | 7 +++++ kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 4f2826f..a02b624 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) * A queue event has occurred, and we're going to schedule. In * this case, we can save a useless back to back clock update. */ - if (rq->curr->on_rq && test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr)) + if (task_on_rq_queued(rq->curr) && test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr)) rq->skip_clock_update = 1; } @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu) static void __migrate_swap_task(struct task_struct *p, int cpu) { - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { struct rq *src_rq, *dst_rq; src_rq = task_rq(p); @@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data); unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state) { unsigned long flags; - int running, on_rq; + int running, queued; unsigned long ncsw; struct rq *rq; @@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state) rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); trace_sched_wait_task(p); running = task_running(rq, p); - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); ncsw = 0; if (!match_state || p->state == match_state) ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */ @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, long match_state) * running right now), it's preempted, and we should * yield - it could be a while. */ - if (unlikely(on_rq)) { + if (unlikely(queued)) { ktime_t to = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ); set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) static void ttwu_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_flags) { activate_task(rq, p, en_flags); - p->on_rq = 1; + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; /* if a worker is waking up, notify workqueue */ if (p->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) @@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@ static int ttwu_remote(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags) int ret = 0; rq = __task_rq_lock(p); - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { /* check_preempt_curr() may use rq clock */ update_rq_clock(rq); ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags); @@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) success = 1; /* we're going to change ->state */ cpu = task_cpu(p); - if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) goto stat; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p) if (!(p->state & TASK_NORMAL)) goto out; - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP); ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0); @@ -2095,7 +2095,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p) init_task_runnable_average(p); rq = __task_rq_lock(p); activate_task(rq, p, 0); - p->on_rq = 1; + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; trace_sched_wakeup_new(p, true); check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -2444,7 +2444,7 @@ static u64 do_task_delta_exec(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq) * project cycles that may never be accounted to this * thread, breaking clock_gettime(). */ - if (task_current(rq, p) && p->on_rq) { + if (task_current(rq, p) && task_on_rq_queued(p)) { update_rq_clock(rq); ns = rq_clock_task(rq) - p->se.exec_start; if ((s64)ns < 0) @@ -2490,7 +2490,7 @@ unsigned long long task_sched_runtime(struct task_struct *p) * If we see ->on_cpu without ->on_rq, the task is leaving, and has * been accounted, so we're correct here as well. */ - if (!p->on_cpu || !p->on_rq) + if (!p->on_cpu || !task_on_rq_queued(p)) return p->se.sum_exec_runtime; #endif @@ -2794,7 +2794,7 @@ need_resched: switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; } - if (prev->on_rq || rq->skip_clock_update < 0) + if (task_on_rq_queued(prev) || rq->skip_clock_update < 0) update_rq_clock(rq); next = pick_next_task(rq, prev); @@ -2959,7 +2959,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function); */ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) { - int oldprio, on_rq, running, enqueue_flag = 0; + int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag = 0; struct rq *rq; const struct sched_class *prev_class; @@ -2988,9 +2988,9 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio); oldprio = p->prio; prev_class = p->sched_class; - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); running = task_current(rq, p); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); if (running) p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p); @@ -3030,7 +3030,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio) if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, p, enqueue_flag); check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio); @@ -3041,7 +3041,7 @@ out_unlock: void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) { - int old_prio, delta, on_rq; + int old_prio, delta, queued; unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; @@ -3062,8 +3062,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice); goto out_unlock; } - on_rq = p->on_rq; - if (on_rq) + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice); @@ -3072,7 +3072,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) p->prio = effective_prio(p); delta = p->prio - old_prio; - if (on_rq) { + if (queued) { enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); /* * If the task increased its priority or is running and @@ -3344,7 +3344,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, { int newprio = dl_policy(attr->sched_policy) ? MAX_DL_PRIO - 1 : MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 - attr->sched_priority; - int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, on_rq, running; + int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, queued, running; int policy = attr->sched_policy; unsigned long flags; const struct sched_class *prev_class; @@ -3541,9 +3541,9 @@ change: return 0; } - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); running = task_current(rq, p); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); if (running) p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p); @@ -3553,7 +3553,7 @@ change: if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) { + if (queued) { /* * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is * increased (user space view). @@ -4568,7 +4568,7 @@ void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu) rcu_read_unlock(); rq->curr = rq->idle = idle; - idle->on_rq = 1; + idle->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) idle->on_cpu = 1; #endif @@ -4645,7 +4645,7 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask) goto out; dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, new_mask); - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu }; /* Need help from migration thread: drop lock and wait. */ task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags); @@ -4695,7 +4695,7 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu) * If we're not on a rq, the next wake-up will ensure we're * placed properly. */ - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { dequeue_task(rq_src, p, 0); set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu); enqueue_task(rq_dest, p, 0); @@ -4736,13 +4736,13 @@ void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid) { struct rq *rq; unsigned long flags; - bool on_rq, running; + bool queued, running; rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); - on_rq = p->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); running = task_current(rq, p); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); if (running) p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p); @@ -4751,7 +4751,7 @@ void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid) if (running) p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags); } @@ -7116,13 +7116,13 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) .sched_policy = SCHED_NORMAL, }; int old_prio = p->prio; - int on_rq; + int queued; - on_rq = p->on_rq; - if (on_rq) + queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); __setscheduler(rq, p, &attr); - if (on_rq) { + if (queued) { enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); resched_curr(rq); } @@ -7309,16 +7309,16 @@ void sched_offline_group(struct task_group *tg) void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) { struct task_group *tg; - int on_rq, running; + int queued, running; unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; rq = task_rq_lock(tsk, &flags); running = task_current(rq, tsk); - on_rq = tsk->on_rq; + queued = task_on_rq_queued(tsk); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0); if (unlikely(running)) tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk); @@ -7331,14 +7331,14 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED if (tsk->sched_class->task_move_group) - tsk->sched_class->task_move_group(tsk, on_rq); + tsk->sched_class->task_move_group(tsk, queued); else #endif set_task_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk)); if (unlikely(running)) tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq); - if (on_rq) + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, tsk, 0); task_rq_unlock(rq, tsk, &flags); diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 255ce13..d21a8e0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ again: update_rq_clock(rq); dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; - if (p->on_rq) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH); if (task_has_dl_policy(rq->curr)) check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0); @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ struct task_struct *pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to * re-start task selection. */ - if (rq->stop && rq->stop->on_rq) + if (rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)) return RETRY_TASK; } @@ -1257,7 +1257,8 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq || !cpumask_test_cpu(later_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) || - task_running(rq, task) || !task->on_rq)) { + task_running(rq, task) || + !task_on_rq_queued(task))) { double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq); later_rq = NULL; break; @@ -1296,7 +1297,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq) BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); - BUG_ON(!p->on_rq); + BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); BUG_ON(!dl_task(p)); return p; @@ -1443,7 +1444,7 @@ static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq) dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, this_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr))) { WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr); - WARN_ON(!p->on_rq); + WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); /* * Then we pull iff p has actually an earlier @@ -1596,7 +1597,7 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) if (unlikely(p->dl.dl_throttled)) return; - if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (rq->dl.overloaded && push_dl_task(rq) && rq != task_rq(p)) /* Only reschedule if pushing failed */ @@ -1614,7 +1615,7 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (p->on_rq || rq->curr == p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* * This might be too much, but unfortunately diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index bc37bb9..9e6ca0d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -7494,7 +7494,7 @@ static void task_fork_fair(struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; /* @@ -7519,11 +7519,11 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will * do the right thing. * - * If it's on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already - * have normalized the vruntime, if it's !on_rq, then only when + * If it's queued, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already + * have normalized the vruntime, if it's !queued, then only when * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime. */ - if (!p->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING) { + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->state != TASK_RUNNING) { /* * Fix up our vruntime so that the current sleep doesn't * cause 'unlimited' sleep bonus. @@ -7558,7 +7558,7 @@ static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) */ se->depth = se->parent ? se->parent->depth + 1 : 0; #endif - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; /* @@ -7604,7 +7604,7 @@ void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) } #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED -static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) +static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int queued) { struct sched_entity *se = &p->se; struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; @@ -7623,7 +7623,7 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares. */ /* - * When !on_rq, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized. + * When !queued, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized. * But there are some cases where it has already been normalized: * * - Moving a forked child which is waiting for being woken up by @@ -7634,14 +7634,14 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq) * To prevent boost or penalty in the new cfs_rq caused by delta * min_vruntime between the two cfs_rqs, we skip vruntime adjustment. */ - if (!on_rq && (!se->sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING)) - on_rq = 1; + if (!queued && (!se->sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING)) + queued = 1; - if (!on_rq) + if (!queued) se->vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(se)->min_vruntime; set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p)); se->depth = se->parent ? se->parent->depth + 1 : 0; - if (!on_rq) { + if (!queued) { cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index 5f6edca..4feac8f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) * means a dl or stop task can slip in, in which case we need * to re-start task selection. */ - if (unlikely((rq->stop && rq->stop->on_rq) || + if (unlikely((rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)) || rq->dl.dl_nr_running)) return RETRY_TASK; } @@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(task)) || task_running(rq, task) || - !task->on_rq)) { + !task_on_rq_queued(task))) { double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq); lowest_rq = NULL; @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq) BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p)); BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1); - BUG_ON(!p->on_rq); + BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); return p; @@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) */ if (p && (p->prio < this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)) { WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr); - WARN_ON(!p->on_rq); + WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p)); /* * There's a chance that p is higher in priority @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct task_struct *p, BUG_ON(!rt_task(p)); - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; weight = cpumask_weight(new_mask); @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * we may need to handle the pulling of RT tasks * now. */ - if (!p->on_rq || rq->rt.rt_nr_running) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->rt.rt_nr_running) return; if (pull_rt_task(rq)) @@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) * If that current running task is also an RT task * then see if we can move to another run queue. */ - if (p->on_rq && rq->curr != p) { + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->rt.overloaded && /* Don't resched if we changed runqueues */ @@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) static void prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio) { - if (!p->on_rq) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) return; if (rq->curr == p) { diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 4c2b87f..26566d0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ struct rq; +/* task_struct::on_rq states: */ +#define TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED 1 + extern __read_mostly int scheduler_running; extern unsigned long calc_load_update; @@ -942,6 +945,10 @@ static inline int task_running(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) #endif } +static inline int task_on_rq_queued(struct task_struct *p) +{ + return p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; +} #ifndef prepare_arch_switch # define prepare_arch_switch(next) do { } while (0) diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c index bfe0eda..67426e5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c +++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) { struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop; - if (!stop || !stop->on_rq) + if (!stop || !task_on_rq_queued(stop)) return NULL; put_prev_task(rq, prev); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/5] sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state [not found] <20140820092458.27076.30955.stgit@tkhai> 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:47 ` Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 18:45 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Kirill Tkhai ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Oleg Nesterov, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith, Kirill Tkhai, Tim Chen, Ingo Molnar, Nicolas Pitre This is a new state which will be used to indicate that a task is in a process of migrating between two RQs. It allows to get rid of double_rq_lock(), which we used to use to change a rq of a queued task before. Let's consider the example. To move a task between src_rq and dst_rq we will do the following: raw_spin_lock(&src_rq->lock); /* p is a task which is queued on src_rq */ p = ...; dequeue_task(src_rq, p, 0); p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; set_task_cpu(p, dst_cpu); raw_spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock); /* * Both of RQs are unlocked here. * Task p is dequeued from src_rq * but its on_rq is not zero. */ raw_spin_lock(&dst_rq->lock); p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; enqueue_task(dst_rq, p, 0); raw_spin_unlock(&dst_rq->lock); While p->on_rq is TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, task is considered as "migrating", and other parallel scheduler actions with it are not available for parallel caller. The parallel caller is spining till migration is completed. The unavailable actions are changing of cpu affinity, changing of priority etc, in other words all the functionality which used to require task_rq(p)->lock before (and related to the task). To implement TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING support we primarily are using the following fact. Most of scheduler users (from which we are protecting a migrating task) use task_rq_lock() and __task_rq_lock() to get the lock of task_rq(p). These primitives know that task's cpu may change, and they are spining while the lock of the right RQ is not held. We add one more condition into them, so they will be also spinning until the migration is finished. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 12 +++++++++--- kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 1276ba2..cef1a13 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -317,9 +317,12 @@ static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p) for (;;) { rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) return rq; raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + + while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + cpu_relax(); } } @@ -336,10 +339,13 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags); rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) return rq; raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags); + + while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + cpu_relax(); } } @@ -1662,7 +1668,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) success = 1; /* we're going to change ->state */ cpu = task_cpu(p); - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) + if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) goto stat; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 26566d0..aa0f73b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct rq; /* task_struct::on_rq states: */ #define TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED 1 +#define TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING 2 extern __read_mostly int scheduler_running; @@ -950,6 +951,11 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_queued(struct task_struct *p) return p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; } +static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(struct task_struct *p) +{ + return p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; +} + #ifndef prepare_arch_switch # define prepare_arch_switch(next) do { } while (0) #endif ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:45 ` tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: linux-kernel, ktkhai, hpa, mingo, torvalds, pjt, peterz, nicolas.pitre, tim.c.chen, umgwanakikbuti, rostedt, tkhai, tglx, oleg Commit-ID: cca26e8009d1939a6a5bf0200d276fa26f03e536 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cca26e8009d1939a6a5bf0200d276fa26f03e536 Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:47:42 +0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:53:00 +0200 sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state This is a new p->on_rq state which will be used to indicate that a task is in a process of migrating between two RQs. It allows to get rid of double_rq_lock(), which we used to use to change a rq of a queued task before. Let's consider an example. To move a task between src_rq and dst_rq we will do the following: raw_spin_lock(&src_rq->lock); /* p is a task which is queued on src_rq */ p = ...; dequeue_task(src_rq, p, 0); p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; set_task_cpu(p, dst_cpu); raw_spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock); /* * Both RQs are unlocked here. * Task p is dequeued from src_rq * but its on_rq value is not zero. */ raw_spin_lock(&dst_rq->lock); p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; enqueue_task(dst_rq, p, 0); raw_spin_unlock(&dst_rq->lock); While p->on_rq is TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, task is considered as "migrating", and other parallel scheduler actions with it are not available to parallel callers. The parallel caller is spining till migration is completed. The unavailable actions are changing of cpu affinity, changing of priority etc, in other words all the functionality which used to require task_rq(p)->lock before (and related to the task). To implement TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING support we primarily are using the following fact. Most of scheduler users (from which we are protecting a migrating task) use task_rq_lock() and __task_rq_lock() to get the lock of task_rq(p). These primitives know that task's cpu may change, and they are spining while the lock of the right RQ is not held. We add one more condition into them, so they will be also spinning until the migration is finished. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408528062.23412.88.camel@tkhai Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 12 +++++++++--- kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index a02b624..71b8360 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -333,9 +333,12 @@ static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p) for (;;) { rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) return rq; raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + + while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + cpu_relax(); } } @@ -352,10 +355,13 @@ static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags); rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p))) + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) return rq; raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags); + + while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + cpu_relax(); } } @@ -1678,7 +1684,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) success = 1; /* we're going to change ->state */ cpu = task_cpu(p); - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) + if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) goto stat; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 26566d0..aa0f73b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct rq; /* task_struct::on_rq states: */ #define TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED 1 +#define TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING 2 extern __read_mostly int scheduler_running; @@ -950,6 +951,11 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_queued(struct task_struct *p) return p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; } +static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(struct task_struct *p) +{ + return p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; +} + #ifndef prepare_arch_switch # define prepare_arch_switch(next) do { } while (0) #endif ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 3/5] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() [not found] <20140820092458.27076.30955.stgit@tkhai> 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:47 ` Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Kirill Tkhai 4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Oleg Nesterov, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith, Kirill Tkhai, Tim Chen, Ingo Molnar, Nicolas Pitre Avoid double_rq_lock() and use TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING for __migrate_task(). The advantage is (obviously) not holding two 'rq->lock's at the same time and thereby increasing parallelism. The important point to note is that because we acquire dst->lock immediately after releasing src->lock the potential wait time of task_rq_lock() callers on TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING is not longer than it would have been in the double rq lock scenario. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index cef1a13..a50393b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4663,20 +4663,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_cpus_allowed_ptr); */ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu) { - struct rq *rq_dest, *rq_src; + struct rq *rq; int ret = 0; if (unlikely(!cpu_active(dest_cpu))) return ret; - rq_src = cpu_rq(src_cpu); - rq_dest = cpu_rq(dest_cpu); + rq = cpu_rq(src_cpu); raw_spin_lock(&p->pi_lock); - double_rq_lock(rq_src, rq_dest); + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); /* Already moved. */ if (task_cpu(p) != src_cpu) goto done; + /* Affinity changed (again). */ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) goto fail; @@ -4686,15 +4686,22 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu) * placed properly. */ if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { - dequeue_task(rq_src, p, 0); + dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu); - enqueue_task(rq_dest, p, 0); - check_preempt_curr(rq_dest, p, 0); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + + rq = cpu_rq(dest_cpu); + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; + enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); } done: ret = 1; fail: - double_rq_unlock(rq_src, rq_dest); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock); return ret; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:46 ` tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: linux-kernel, ktkhai, hpa, mingo, torvalds, pjt, peterz, nicolas.pitre, tim.c.chen, umgwanakikbuti, rostedt, tkhai, tglx, oleg Commit-ID: a1e01829796aa7a993e28ffd7fee5c8d525be175 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a1e01829796aa7a993e28ffd7fee5c8d525be175 Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:47:50 +0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:53:02 +0200 sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Avoid double_rq_lock() and use TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING for __migrate_task(). The advantage is (obviously) not holding two rq->lock's at the same time and thereby increasing parallelism. The important point to note is that because we acquire dst->lock immediately after releasing src->lock the potential wait time of task_rq_lock() callers on TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING is not longer than it would have been in the double rq lock scenario. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408528070.23412.89.camel@tkhai Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 71b8360..a773c91 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4679,20 +4679,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_cpus_allowed_ptr); */ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu) { - struct rq *rq_dest, *rq_src; + struct rq *rq; int ret = 0; if (unlikely(!cpu_active(dest_cpu))) return ret; - rq_src = cpu_rq(src_cpu); - rq_dest = cpu_rq(dest_cpu); + rq = cpu_rq(src_cpu); raw_spin_lock(&p->pi_lock); - double_rq_lock(rq_src, rq_dest); + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); /* Already moved. */ if (task_cpu(p) != src_cpu) goto done; + /* Affinity changed (again). */ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) goto fail; @@ -4702,15 +4702,22 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu) * placed properly. */ if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { - dequeue_task(rq_src, p, 0); + dequeue_task(rq, p, 0); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu); - enqueue_task(rq_dest, p, 0); - check_preempt_curr(rq_dest, p, 0); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + + rq = cpu_rq(dest_cpu); + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; + enqueue_task(rq, p, 0); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); } done: ret = 1; fail: - double_rq_unlock(rq_src, rq_dest); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock); return ret; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() [not found] <20140820092458.27076.30955.stgit@tkhai> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:48 ` Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Kirill Tkhai 4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Oleg Nesterov, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith, Kirill Tkhai, Tim Chen, Ingo Molnar, Nicolas Pitre Avoid double_rq_lock() and use TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING for active_load_balance_cpu_stop(). The advantage is (obviously) not holding two 'rq->lock's at the same time and thereby increasing parallelism. Further note that if there was no task to migrate we will not have acquired the second rq->lock at all. The important point to note is that because we acquire dst->lock immediately after releasing src->lock the potential wait time of task_rq_lock() callers on TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING is not longer than it would have been in the double rq lock scenario. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 9e6ca0d..7e5cf05 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5138,6 +5138,8 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) { s64 delta; + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class) return 0; @@ -5257,6 +5259,9 @@ static int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) { int tsk_cache_hot = 0; + + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + /* * We do not migrate tasks that are: * 1) throttled_lb_pair, or @@ -5341,30 +5346,49 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) } /* - * move_one_task tries to move exactly one task from busiest to this_rq, as + * detach_one_task() -- tries to dequeue exactly one task from env->src_rq, as * part of active balancing operations within "domain". - * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise. * - * Called with both runqueues locked. + * Returns a task if successful and NULL otherwise. */ -static int move_one_task(struct lb_env *env) +static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) { struct task_struct *p, *n; + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) { if (!can_migrate_task(p, env)) continue; - move_task(p, env); + deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; + set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); + /* - * Right now, this is only the second place move_task() - * is called, so we can safely collect move_task() - * stats here rather than inside move_task(). + * Right now, this is only the second place where + * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is move_tasks) + * so we can safely collect stats here rather than + * inside move_tasks(). */ schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle]); - return 1; + return p; } - return 0; + return NULL; +} + +/* + * attach_one_task() -- attaches the task returned from detach_one_task() to + * its new rq. + */ +static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; + activate_task(rq, p, 0); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); } static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break = 32; @@ -6943,6 +6967,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) int target_cpu = busiest_rq->push_cpu; struct rq *target_rq = cpu_rq(target_cpu); struct sched_domain *sd; + struct task_struct *p = NULL; raw_spin_lock_irq(&busiest_rq->lock); @@ -6962,9 +6987,6 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) */ BUG_ON(busiest_rq == target_rq); - /* move a task from busiest_rq to target_rq */ - double_lock_balance(busiest_rq, target_rq); - /* Search for an sd spanning us and the target CPU. */ rcu_read_lock(); for_each_domain(target_cpu, sd) { @@ -6985,16 +7007,22 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) schedstat_inc(sd, alb_count); - if (move_one_task(&env)) + p = detach_one_task(&env); + if (p) schedstat_inc(sd, alb_pushed); else schedstat_inc(sd, alb_failed); } rcu_read_unlock(); - double_unlock_balance(busiest_rq, target_rq); out_unlock: busiest_rq->active_balance = 0; - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&busiest_rq->lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&busiest_rq->lock); + + if (p) + attach_one_task(target_rq, p); + + local_irq_enable(); + return 0; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() 2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:46 ` tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: linux-kernel, ktkhai, hpa, mingo, torvalds, pjt, peterz, nicolas.pitre, tim.c.chen, umgwanakikbuti, rostedt, tkhai, tglx, oleg Commit-ID: e5673f280501298dbb56efa46e333cf64ee5080a Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e5673f280501298dbb56efa46e333cf64ee5080a Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:48:01 +0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:53:03 +0200 sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Avoid double_rq_lock() and use the TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state for active_load_balance_cpu_stop(). The advantage is (obviously) not holding two 'rq->lock's at the same time and thereby increasing parallelism. Further note that if there was no task to migrate we will not have acquired the second rq->lock at all. The important point to note is that because we acquire dst->lock immediately after releasing src->lock the potential wait time of task_rq_lock() callers on TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING is not longer than it would have been in the double rq lock scenario. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408528081.23412.92.camel@tkhai Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 9e6ca0d..7e5cf05 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5138,6 +5138,8 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) { s64 delta; + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class) return 0; @@ -5257,6 +5259,9 @@ static int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) { int tsk_cache_hot = 0; + + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + /* * We do not migrate tasks that are: * 1) throttled_lb_pair, or @@ -5341,30 +5346,49 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) } /* - * move_one_task tries to move exactly one task from busiest to this_rq, as + * detach_one_task() -- tries to dequeue exactly one task from env->src_rq, as * part of active balancing operations within "domain". - * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise. * - * Called with both runqueues locked. + * Returns a task if successful and NULL otherwise. */ -static int move_one_task(struct lb_env *env) +static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) { struct task_struct *p, *n; + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) { if (!can_migrate_task(p, env)) continue; - move_task(p, env); + deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; + set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); + /* - * Right now, this is only the second place move_task() - * is called, so we can safely collect move_task() - * stats here rather than inside move_task(). + * Right now, this is only the second place where + * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is move_tasks) + * so we can safely collect stats here rather than + * inside move_tasks(). */ schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle]); - return 1; + return p; } - return 0; + return NULL; +} + +/* + * attach_one_task() -- attaches the task returned from detach_one_task() to + * its new rq. + */ +static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; + activate_task(rq, p, 0); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); } static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break = 32; @@ -6943,6 +6967,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) int target_cpu = busiest_rq->push_cpu; struct rq *target_rq = cpu_rq(target_cpu); struct sched_domain *sd; + struct task_struct *p = NULL; raw_spin_lock_irq(&busiest_rq->lock); @@ -6962,9 +6987,6 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) */ BUG_ON(busiest_rq == target_rq); - /* move a task from busiest_rq to target_rq */ - double_lock_balance(busiest_rq, target_rq); - /* Search for an sd spanning us and the target CPU. */ rcu_read_lock(); for_each_domain(target_cpu, sd) { @@ -6985,16 +7007,22 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) schedstat_inc(sd, alb_count); - if (move_one_task(&env)) + p = detach_one_task(&env); + if (p) schedstat_inc(sd, alb_pushed); else schedstat_inc(sd, alb_failed); } rcu_read_unlock(); - double_unlock_balance(busiest_rq, target_rq); out_unlock: busiest_rq->active_balance = 0; - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&busiest_rq->lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&busiest_rq->lock); + + if (p) + attach_one_task(target_rq, p); + + local_irq_enable(); + return 0; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() [not found] <20140820092458.27076.30955.stgit@tkhai> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:48 ` Kirill Tkhai 2014-08-20 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Oleg Nesterov, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith, Kirill Tkhai, Tim Chen, Ingo Molnar, Nicolas Pitre Avoid double_rq_lock() and use TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING for load_balance(). The advantage is (obviously) not holding two 'rq->lock's at the same time and thereby increasing parallelism. Further note that if there was no task to migrate we will not have acquired the second rq->lock at all. The important point to note is that because we acquire dst->lock immediately after releasing src->lock the potential wait time of task_rq_lock() callers on TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING is not longer than it would have been in the double rq lock scenario. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 7e5cf05..d3427a8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4709,7 +4709,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_ return; /* - * This is possible from callers such as move_task(), in which we + * This is possible from callers such as attach_tasks(), in which we * unconditionally check_prempt_curr() after an enqueue (which may have * lead to a throttle). This both saves work and prevents false * next-buddy nomination below. @@ -5117,21 +5117,10 @@ struct lb_env { unsigned int loop_max; enum fbq_type fbq_type; + struct list_head tasks; }; /* - * move_task - move a task from one runqueue to another runqueue. - * Both runqueues must be locked. - */ -static void move_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) -{ - deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); - set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); - activate_task(env->dst_rq, p, 0); - check_preempt_curr(env->dst_rq, p, 0); -} - -/* * Is this task likely cache-hot: */ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) @@ -5346,6 +5335,18 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) } /* + * detach_task() -- detach the task for the migration specified in env + */ +static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + + deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; + set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); +} + +/* * detach_one_task() -- tries to dequeue exactly one task from env->src_rq, as * part of active balancing operations within "domain". * @@ -5361,15 +5362,13 @@ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) if (!can_migrate_task(p, env)) continue; - deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); - p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; - set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); + detach_task(p, env); /* * Right now, this is only the second place where - * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is move_tasks) + * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is detach_tasks) * so we can safely collect stats here rather than - * inside move_tasks(). + * inside detach_tasks(). */ schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle]); return p; @@ -5377,35 +5376,22 @@ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) return NULL; } -/* - * attach_one_task() -- attaches the task returned from detach_one_task() to - * its new rq. - */ -static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) -{ - raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); - p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; - activate_task(rq, p, 0); - check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); -} - static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break = 32; /* - * move_tasks tries to move up to imbalance weighted load from busiest to - * this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd". - * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise. + * detach_tasks() -- tries to detach up to imbalance weighted load from + * busiest_rq, as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd". * - * Called with both runqueues locked. + * Returns number of detached tasks if successful and 0 otherwise. */ -static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env) +static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) { struct list_head *tasks = &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks; struct task_struct *p; unsigned long load; - int pulled = 0; + int detached = 0; + + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); if (env->imbalance <= 0) return 0; @@ -5436,14 +5422,16 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env) if ((load / 2) > env->imbalance) goto next; - move_task(p, env); - pulled++; + detach_task(p, env); + list_add(&p->se.group_node, &env->tasks); + + detached++; env->imbalance -= load; #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT /* * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible - * kernels will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize + * kernels will stop after the first task is detached to minimize * the critical section. */ if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) @@ -5463,13 +5451,58 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env) } /* - * Right now, this is one of only two places move_task() is called, - * so we can safely collect move_task() stats here rather than - * inside move_task(). + * Right now, this is one of only two places we collect this stat + * so we can safely collect detach_one_task() stats here rather + * than inside detach_one_task(). */ - schedstat_add(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle], pulled); + schedstat_add(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle], detached); - return pulled; + return detached; +} + +/* + * attach_task() -- attach the task detached by detach_task() to its new rq. + */ +static void attach_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock); + + BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; + activate_task(rq, p, 0); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); +} + +/* + * attach_one_task() -- attaches the task returned from detach_one_task() to + * its new rq. + */ +static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + attach_task(rq, p); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); +} + +/* + * attach_tasks() -- attaches all tasks detached by detach_tasks() to their + * new rq. + */ +static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) +{ + struct list_head *tasks = &env->tasks; + struct task_struct *p; + + raw_spin_lock(&env->dst_rq->lock); + + while (!list_empty(tasks)) { + p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node); + list_del_init(&p->se.group_node); + + attach_task(env->dst_rq, p); + } + + raw_spin_unlock(&env->dst_rq->lock); } #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED @@ -6603,6 +6636,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, .loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break, .cpus = cpus, .fbq_type = all, + .tasks = LIST_HEAD_INIT(env.tasks), }; /* @@ -6652,16 +6686,29 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, env.loop_max = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running); more_balance: - local_irq_save(flags); - double_rq_lock(env.dst_rq, busiest); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&busiest->lock, flags); /* * cur_ld_moved - load moved in current iteration * ld_moved - cumulative load moved across iterations */ - cur_ld_moved = move_tasks(&env); - ld_moved += cur_ld_moved; - double_rq_unlock(env.dst_rq, busiest); + cur_ld_moved = detach_tasks(&env); + + /* + * We've detached some tasks from busiest_rq. Every + * task is masked "TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING", so we can safely + * unlock busiest->lock, and we are able to be sure + * that nobody can manipulate the tasks in parallel. + * See task_rq_lock() family for the details. + */ + + raw_spin_unlock(&busiest->lock); + + if (cur_ld_moved) { + attach_tasks(&env); + ld_moved += cur_ld_moved; + } + local_irq_restore(flags); /* @@ -6797,7 +6844,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, * If we've begun active balancing, start to back off. This * case may not be covered by the all_pinned logic if there * is only 1 task on the busy runqueue (because we don't call - * move_tasks). + * detach_tasks). */ if (sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval) sd->balance_interval *= 2; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() 2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:46 ` tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai @ 2014-08-20 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: linux-kernel, ktkhai, hpa, mingo, torvalds, pjt, peterz, nicolas.pitre, tim.c.chen, umgwanakikbuti, rostedt, tkhai, tglx, oleg Commit-ID: 163122b7fcfa28c0e4a838fcc8043c616746802e Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/163122b7fcfa28c0e4a838fcc8043c616746802e Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:48:29 +0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:53:05 +0200 sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Avoid double_rq_lock() and use TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING for load_balance(). The advantage is (obviously) not holding two rq->lock's at the same time and thereby increasing parallelism. Further note that if there was no task to migrate we will not have acquired the second rq->lock at all. The important point to note is that because we acquire dst->lock immediately after releasing src->lock the potential wait time of task_rq_lock() callers on TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING is not longer than it would have been in the double rq lock scenario. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1408528109.23412.94.camel@tkhai Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 7e5cf05..d3427a8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4709,7 +4709,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_ return; /* - * This is possible from callers such as move_task(), in which we + * This is possible from callers such as attach_tasks(), in which we * unconditionally check_prempt_curr() after an enqueue (which may have * lead to a throttle). This both saves work and prevents false * next-buddy nomination below. @@ -5117,21 +5117,10 @@ struct lb_env { unsigned int loop_max; enum fbq_type fbq_type; + struct list_head tasks; }; /* - * move_task - move a task from one runqueue to another runqueue. - * Both runqueues must be locked. - */ -static void move_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) -{ - deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); - set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); - activate_task(env->dst_rq, p, 0); - check_preempt_curr(env->dst_rq, p, 0); -} - -/* * Is this task likely cache-hot: */ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) @@ -5346,6 +5335,18 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) } /* + * detach_task() -- detach the task for the migration specified in env + */ +static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); + + deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; + set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); +} + +/* * detach_one_task() -- tries to dequeue exactly one task from env->src_rq, as * part of active balancing operations within "domain". * @@ -5361,15 +5362,13 @@ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) if (!can_migrate_task(p, env)) continue; - deactivate_task(env->src_rq, p, 0); - p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; - set_task_cpu(p, env->dst_cpu); + detach_task(p, env); /* * Right now, this is only the second place where - * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is move_tasks) + * lb_gained[env->idle] is updated (other is detach_tasks) * so we can safely collect stats here rather than - * inside move_tasks(). + * inside detach_tasks(). */ schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle]); return p; @@ -5377,35 +5376,22 @@ static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env) return NULL; } -/* - * attach_one_task() -- attaches the task returned from detach_one_task() to - * its new rq. - */ -static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) -{ - raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); - p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; - activate_task(rq, p, 0); - check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); -} - static const unsigned int sched_nr_migrate_break = 32; /* - * move_tasks tries to move up to imbalance weighted load from busiest to - * this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd". - * Returns 1 if successful and 0 otherwise. + * detach_tasks() -- tries to detach up to imbalance weighted load from + * busiest_rq, as part of a balancing operation within domain "sd". * - * Called with both runqueues locked. + * Returns number of detached tasks if successful and 0 otherwise. */ -static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env) +static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) { struct list_head *tasks = &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks; struct task_struct *p; unsigned long load; - int pulled = 0; + int detached = 0; + + lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock); if (env->imbalance <= 0) return 0; @@ -5436,14 +5422,16 @@ static int move_tasks(struct lb_env *env) if ((load / 2) > env->imbalance) goto next; - move_task(p, env); - pulled++; + detach_task(p, env); + list_add(&p->se.group_node, &env->tasks); + + detached++; env->imbalance -= load; #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT /* * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible - * kernels will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize + * kernels will stop after the first task is detached to minimize * the critical section. */ if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) @@ -5463,13 +5451,58 @@ next: } /* - * Right now, this is one of only two places move_task() is called, - * so we can safely collect move_task() stats here rather than - * inside move_task(). + * Right now, this is one of only two places we collect this stat + * so we can safely collect detach_one_task() stats here rather + * than inside detach_one_task(). */ - schedstat_add(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle], pulled); + schedstat_add(env->sd, lb_gained[env->idle], detached); - return pulled; + return detached; +} + +/* + * attach_task() -- attach the task detached by detach_task() to its new rq. + */ +static void attach_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock); + + BUG_ON(task_rq(p) != rq); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED; + activate_task(rq, p, 0); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); +} + +/* + * attach_one_task() -- attaches the task returned from detach_one_task() to + * its new rq. + */ +static void attach_one_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + attach_task(rq, p); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); +} + +/* + * attach_tasks() -- attaches all tasks detached by detach_tasks() to their + * new rq. + */ +static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env) +{ + struct list_head *tasks = &env->tasks; + struct task_struct *p; + + raw_spin_lock(&env->dst_rq->lock); + + while (!list_empty(tasks)) { + p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node); + list_del_init(&p->se.group_node); + + attach_task(env->dst_rq, p); + } + + raw_spin_unlock(&env->dst_rq->lock); } #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED @@ -6603,6 +6636,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, .loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break, .cpus = cpus, .fbq_type = all, + .tasks = LIST_HEAD_INIT(env.tasks), }; /* @@ -6652,16 +6686,29 @@ redo: env.loop_max = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running); more_balance: - local_irq_save(flags); - double_rq_lock(env.dst_rq, busiest); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&busiest->lock, flags); /* * cur_ld_moved - load moved in current iteration * ld_moved - cumulative load moved across iterations */ - cur_ld_moved = move_tasks(&env); - ld_moved += cur_ld_moved; - double_rq_unlock(env.dst_rq, busiest); + cur_ld_moved = detach_tasks(&env); + + /* + * We've detached some tasks from busiest_rq. Every + * task is masked "TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING", so we can safely + * unlock busiest->lock, and we are able to be sure + * that nobody can manipulate the tasks in parallel. + * See task_rq_lock() family for the details. + */ + + raw_spin_unlock(&busiest->lock); + + if (cur_ld_moved) { + attach_tasks(&env); + ld_moved += cur_ld_moved; + } + local_irq_restore(flags); /* @@ -6797,7 +6844,7 @@ more_balance: * If we've begun active balancing, start to back off. This * case may not be covered by the all_pinned logic if there * is only 1 task on the busy runqueue (because we don't call - * move_tasks). + * detach_tasks). */ if (sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval) sd->balance_interval *= 2; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-20 18:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20140820092458.27076.30955.stgit@tkhai>
2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sched: Wrapper for checking task_struct::on_rq Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 18:45 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Add wrapper for checking task_struct:: on_rq tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] sched: Teach scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 18:45 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] sched: Remove double_rq_lock() from __migrate_task() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from active_load_balance_cpu_stop() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Remove double_lock_balance() from load_balance() Kirill Tkhai
2014-08-20 18:46 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.