All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mikpe@it.uu.se, tglx@linutronix.de,
	venki@google.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:31:10 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-fe44d62122829959e960bc699318d58966922a69@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292242433.6803.199.camel@twins>

Commit-ID:  fe44d62122829959e960bc699318d58966922a69
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/fe44d62122829959e960bc699318d58966922a69
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:15:34 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:17:46 +0100

sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps

Some ARM systems have a short sched_clock() [ which needs to be fixed
too ], but this exposed a bug in the irq_time code as well, it doesn't
deal with wraps at all.

Fix the irq_time code to deal with u64 wraps by re-writing the code to
only use delta increments, which avoids the whole issue.

Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Reported-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1292242433.6803.199.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched.c |   83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index da14302..79b557c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -636,23 +636,18 @@ static inline struct task_group *task_group(struct task_struct *p)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu);
-static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 irq_time);
+static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta);
 
-inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
+static void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
-	u64 irq_time;
+	s64 delta;
 
 	if (rq->skip_clock_update)
 		return;
 
-	rq->clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
-	irq_time = irq_time_cpu(cpu);
-	if (rq->clock - irq_time > rq->clock_task)
-		rq->clock_task = rq->clock - irq_time;
-
-	sched_irq_time_avg_update(rq, irq_time);
+	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->clock;
+	rq->clock += delta;
+	update_rq_clock_task(rq, delta);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1946,19 +1941,20 @@ void disable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
 	sched_clock_irqtime = 0;
 }
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
+static inline u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
 {
-	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
-		return 0;
-
 	return per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) + per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Called before incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter
+ * and before decrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_exit.
+ */
 void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	s64 delta;
 	int cpu;
-	u64 now, delta;
 
 	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
 		return;
@@ -1966,9 +1962,9 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
-	delta = now - per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu);
-	per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu) = now;
+	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - __this_cpu_read(irq_start_time);
+	__this_cpu_add(irq_start_time, delta);
+
 	/*
 	 * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
 	 * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
@@ -1976,33 +1972,54 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
 	 * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
 	 */
 	if (hardirq_count())
-		per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu) += delta;
+		__this_cpu_add(cpu_hardirq_time, delta);
 	else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(curr->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
-		per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) += delta;
+		__this_cpu_add(cpu_softirq_time, delta);
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(account_system_vtime);
 
-static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 curr_irq_time)
+static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 {
-	if (sched_clock_irqtime && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER)) {
-		u64 delta_irq = curr_irq_time - rq->prev_irq_time;
-		rq->prev_irq_time = curr_irq_time;
-		sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_irq);
-	}
+	s64 irq_delta;
+
+	irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
+	 * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
+	 * {soft,}irq region.
+	 *
+	 * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
+	 * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
+	 * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
+	 * monotonic.
+	 *
+	 * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}irq
+	 * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
+	 * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
+	 * atomic ops.
+	 */
+	if (irq_delta > delta)
+		irq_delta = delta;
+
+	rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
+	delta -= irq_delta;
+	rq->clock_task += delta;
+
+	if (irq_delta && sched_feat(NONIRQ_POWER))
+		sched_rt_avg_update(rq, irq_delta);
 }
 
-#else
+#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
+static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
 {
-	return 0;
+	rq->clock_task += delta;
 }
 
-static void sched_irq_time_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 curr_irq_time) { }
-
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
 
 #include "sched_idletask.c"
 #include "sched_fair.c"

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-10 20:38 [PATCH] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 22:09 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-10 22:09   ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-13 12:13   ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-13 12:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-15 18:16     ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-15 18:16       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-15 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-15 18:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 12:31     ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-13 12:13   ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code for 32bit Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-13 12:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-16 12:31     ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-11  2:23 ` [PATCH] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-11  2:23   ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-11  9:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-12 13:03 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-12 13:03   ` Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-fe44d62122829959e960bc699318d58966922a69@git.kernel.org \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.