All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Subject: [report] lockdep warning when mounting seed device
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:39:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tuq0pxpx.fsf@damenly.su> (raw)


While playing with seed device(misc/next and v5.11), lockdep 
complains the following:

To reproduce:

dev1=/dev/sdb1
dev2=/dev/sdb2

umount /mnt

mkfs.btrfs -f $dev1

btrfstune -S 1 $dev1

mount $dev1 /mnt

btrfs device add $dev2 /mnt/ -f

umount /mnt

mount $dev2 /mnt

umount /mnt


Warning:

[  104.348749] BTRFS: device fsid 
9a34d68b-fd18-470c-8cfc-44916c364c76 devid 1 transid 5 /dev/sdb1 
scanned by mkfs.btrfs (627)
[  104.377243] BTRFS info (device sdb1): disk space caching is 
enabled
[  104.378091] BTRFS info (device sdb1): has skinny extents
[  104.378800] BTRFS info (device sdb1): flagging fs with big 
metadata feature
[  104.512522] BTRFS info (device sdb1): relocating block group 
567279616 flags system|dup
[  104.535912] BTRFS info (device sdb1): relocating block group 
22020096 flags system|dup
[  104.571307] BTRFS info (device sdb1): disk added /dev/sdb2
[  104.602831] BTRFS info (device sdb2): disk space caching is 
enabled
[  104.603692] BTRFS info (device sdb2): has skinny extents

[  104.606389] 
======================================================
[  104.607212] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency 
detected
[  104.608025] 5.11.0-rc7-custom+ #55 Tainted: G           O
[  104.608790] 
------------------------------------------------------
[  104.609599] mount/670 is trying to acquire lock:
[  104.610207] ffffa2274d7158e8 
(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
clone_fs_devices+0x4f/0x160 [btrfs]
[  104.611585]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  104.612334] ffffa22750e32f20 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: 
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2d/0x110 [btrfs]
[  104.651264]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  104.708041]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) 
               is:
[  104.743619]
               -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[  104.777693]        down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[  104.794386]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2d/0x110 [btrfs]
[  104.811338]        btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x36/0x50 [btrfs]
[  104.828574]        btrfs_search_slot+0x473/0x900 [btrfs]
[  104.845543]        btrfs_update_device+0x71/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[  104.862164]        btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x121/0x490 [btrfs]
[  104.878474] 
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x151/0x2c0 [btrfs]
[  104.894725]        btrfs_commit_transaction+0x82/0xb30 [btrfs]
[  104.910808]        btrfs_init_new_device+0x1015/0x14d0 [btrfs]
[  104.926879]        btrfs_ioctl+0x1ff/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
[  104.942996]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xc0
[  104.958874]        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x50
[  104.974554]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  104.990108]
               -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  105.020508]        __lock_acquire+0x11e0/0x1ea0
[  105.035759]        lock_acquire+0xd8/0x3c0
[  105.050434]        __mutex_lock+0x8f/0x870
[  105.064614]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[  105.078641]        clone_fs_devices+0x4f/0x160 [btrfs]
[  105.092984]        btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x30e/0x7f0 [btrfs]
[  105.107031]        open_ctree+0xb40/0x176a [btrfs]
[  105.120673]        btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xeb [btrfs]
[  105.134564]        legacy_get_tree+0x34/0x60
[  105.148347]        vfs_get_tree+0x2d/0xc0
[  105.162053]        vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x78/0xc0
[  105.176072]        vfs_kern_mount+0x13/0x20
[  105.189844]        btrfs_mount+0x11f/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[  105.203396]        legacy_get_tree+0x34/0x60
[  105.217129]        vfs_get_tree+0x2d/0xc0
[  105.230536]        path_mount+0x48c/0xd30
[  105.243915]        __x64_sys_mount+0x108/0x140
[  105.257030]        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x50
[  105.270084]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  105.283382]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  105.321699]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  105.347053]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  105.359640]        ----                    ----
[  105.372004]   lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
[  105.384023] 
lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[  105.396858] 
lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
[  105.409215]   lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[  105.421625]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[  105.457447] 3 locks held by mount/670:
[  105.469302]  #0: ffffa2270932e0e8 
(&type->s_umount_key#54/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xdf/0x3c0
[  105.494413]  #1: ffffffffc0bdfdd0 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x5c/0x7f0 [btrfs]
[  105.521072]  #2: ffffa22750e32f20 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, 
at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2d/0x110 [btrfs]
[  105.549753]
               stack backtrace:
[  105.578187] CPU: 6 PID: 670 Comm: mount Tainted: G           O 
5.11.0-rc7-custom+ #55
[  105.607477] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 
1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.14.0-1 04/01/2014
[  105.638608] Call Trace:
[  105.653967]  dump_stack+0x90/0xb8
[  105.669419]  print_circular_bug.cold+0x13d/0x142
[  105.684814]  check_noncircular+0xf2/0x110
[  105.700322]  ? check_path.constprop.0+0x26/0x40
[  105.715821]  __lock_acquire+0x11e0/0x1ea0
[  105.731388]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
[  105.747097]  ? lockdep_unlock+0x33/0xd0
[  105.763012]  lock_acquire+0xd8/0x3c0
[  105.779043]  ? clone_fs_devices+0x4f/0x160 [btrfs]
[  105.795343]  __mutex_lock+0x8f/0x870
[  105.811251]  ? clone_fs_devices+0x4f/0x160 [btrfs]
[  105.827385]  ? lockdep_init_map_waits+0x51/0x250
[  105.843343]  ? clone_fs_devices+0x4f/0x160 [btrfs]
[  105.859264]  ? debug_mutex_init+0x36/0x50
[  105.875378]  ? __mutex_init+0x62/0x70
[  105.891493]  mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[  105.907847]  clone_fs_devices+0x4f/0x160 [btrfs]
[  105.923756]  ? btrfs_get_64+0x63/0x110 [btrfs]
[  105.939389]  btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x30e/0x7f0 [btrfs]
[  105.954580]  open_ctree+0xb40/0x176a [btrfs]
[  105.969477]  ? bdi_register_va+0x1b/0x20
[  105.983674]  ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0
[  105.997611]  btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xeb [btrfs]
[  106.011564]  ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x217/0x3b0
[  106.026013]  legacy_get_tree+0x34/0x60
[  106.040045]  vfs_get_tree+0x2d/0xc0
[  106.053904]  vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x78/0xc0
[  106.067296]  vfs_kern_mount+0x13/0x20
[  106.080125]  btrfs_mount+0x11f/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[  106.093144]  ? kfree+0x5ff/0x670
[  106.106064]  ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x217/0x3b0
[  106.119249]  legacy_get_tree+0x34/0x60
[  106.132216]  vfs_get_tree+0x2d/0xc0
[  106.145225]  path_mount+0x48c/0xd30
[  106.157899]  __x64_sys_mount+0x108/0x140
[  106.170654]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x50
[  106.183208]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  106.196111] RIP: 0033:0x7fafa8869ebe
[  106.208994] Code: 48 8b 0d b5 0f 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 
ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 a5 
00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 82 0f 0c 00 
f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  106.250073] RSP: 002b:00007ffc04365b98 EFLAGS: 00000246 
ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
[  106.278571] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fafa8994264 RCX: 
00007fafa8869ebe
[  106.294048] RDX: 0000556726a02e00 RSI: 00005567269fc690 RDI: 
00005567269fc670
[  106.309646] RBP: 00005567269fc440 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 
00007fafa892ba60
[  106.325336] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 
0000000000000000
[  106.340847] R13: 00005567269fc670 R14: 0000556726a02e00 R15: 
00005567269fc440
[  106.357929] BTRFS info (device sdb2): checking UUID tree

             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25  4:39 Su Yue [this message]
2021-02-26  5:01 ` [report] lockdep warning when mounting seed device Anand Jain
2021-02-26  5:59   ` Su Yue
2021-02-26 15:10   ` David Sterba
2021-03-02  5:04     ` Anand Jain
2021-03-02 11:16       ` David Sterba
2021-02-27  1:12 ` Chris Murphy
2021-02-27  3:34   ` damenly

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tuq0pxpx.fsf@damenly.su \
    --to=l@damenly.su \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.