* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-01 19:53 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-01 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-01 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-01 19:56 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-10-04 20:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (48 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-04 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2009-10-04 20:47:41 ---
On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
>
> The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson
(?)
@ 2009-10-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200910042249.54639.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
>
> The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
Thanks for the update.
Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
regression fixes in there.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Mikael Pettersson, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> >
> > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> regression fixes in there.
I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-04 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Mikael Pettersson, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> >
> > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> regression fixes in there.
I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
@ 2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-09 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Mikael Pettersson writes:
> Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> > >
> > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> > regression fixes in there.
>
> I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
> running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
>
> The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
> suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
> doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
> kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
> directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
>
> I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
> week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
exact same bug on the third machine.
/Mikael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-09 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Mikael Pettersson writes:
> Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> > >
> > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> > regression fixes in there.
>
> I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
> running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
>
> The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
> suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
> doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
> kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
> directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
>
> I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
> week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
exact same bug on the third machine.
/Mikael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (47 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-09 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2009-10-09 22:01:43 ---
On Friday 09 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson writes:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> > > >
> > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update.
> > >
> > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> > > regression fixes in there.
> >
> > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
> > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
> >
> > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
> > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
> > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
> > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
> > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
> >
> > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
> > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
>
> Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> exact same bug on the third machine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson
@ 2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-09 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Friday 09 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson writes:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> > > >
> > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update.
> > >
> > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> > > regression fixes in there.
> >
> > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
> > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
> >
> > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
> > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
> > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
> > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
> > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
> >
> > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
> > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
>
> Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> exact same bug on the third machine.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-09 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Friday 09 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson writes:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > > On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > > > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> > > >
> > > > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update.
> > >
> > > Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> > > regression fixes in there.
> >
> > I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
> > running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.
> >
> > The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
> > suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
> > doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
> > kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
> > directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.
> >
> > I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
> > week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
>
> Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> exact same bug on the third machine.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-12 13:48 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2009-10-10 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson; +Cc: linux-ext4, bugzilla-daemon
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> > exact same bug on the third machine.
Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install"
followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure?
If it does, will copying in a new version of libc.so.6 and then
rebooting be enough to trigger the assert failure?
Thanks,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (46 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-10 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #3 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> 2009-10-10 01:31:41 ---
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> > exact same bug on the third machine.
Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install"
followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure?
If it does, will copying in a new version of libc.so.6 and then
rebooting be enough to trigger the assert failure?
Thanks,
- Ted
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-11 22:41 2.6.32-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-11 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-11 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso
@ 2009-10-12 13:48 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-10-12 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore Tso; +Cc: Mikael Pettersson, linux-ext4, bugzilla-daemon
Theodore Tso writes:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> > > exact same bug on the third machine.
>
> Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install"
> followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure?
I've done repeated glibc downgrades and upgrades, using pre-built binary
packages, followed by reboots, but they have so far not triggered the bug.
My guess is that something in the build process or the test suite run
triggers the bug.
FWIW, the systems are rpm-based derived from Fedora, so the rebuilds
are just "rpmbuild --rebuild glibc-<version>.src.rpm", and the installs
are "rpm -Uvh" on the binary rpms, with --force if I'm doing a downgrade.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (45 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-12 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-10-12 13:48:39 ---
Theodore Tso writes:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:01:44PM +0000,
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > > Not fixed in 2.6.32-rc3. A glibc rebuild + install triggered the
> > > exact same bug on the third machine.
>
> Can you isolate this down to something simpler? Will "make install"
> followed by a reboot be sufficient to replicate the assertion failure?
I've done repeated glibc downgrades and upgrades, using pre-built binary
packages, followed by reboots, but they have so far not triggered the bug.
My guess is that something in the build process or the test suite run
triggers the bug.
FWIW, the systems are rpm-based derived from Fedora, so the rebuilds
are just "rpmbuild --rebuild glibc-<version>.src.rpm", and the installs
are "rpm -Uvh" on the binary rpms, with --force if I'm doing a downgrade.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (44 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-10-12 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sandeen@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> 2009-10-12 16:19:54 ---
I can give this a whirl on fedora. Just to try to reproduce more exactly,
which version of the glibc rpm package are you rebuilding?
I'm also curious, does simply rebuilding the package and rebooting lead to the
same issue (w/o installing the result?)
Do you have rpm configured in any unique way or is the build happening in all
the normal/standard places?
So you have /tmp as ext3 as a separate fs, any other interesting fs config?
Thanks,
-Eric
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-10-26 170 37 32
2009-10-12 161 45 35
2009-10-02 151 49 42
2009-09-06 123 34 27
2009-08-26 108 33 26
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14446
Subject : battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too)
Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-20 08:25 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417
Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Subject : Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
Submitter : Bernhard <berndl81@gmx.at>
Date : 2009-10-14 11:17 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400
Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k
Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (14 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data
Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388
Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31
Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (20 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385
Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption?
Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net>
Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265
Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257
Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System
Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252
Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (37 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249
Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248
Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl>
Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204
Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181
Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown
Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org>
Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (42 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157
Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (46 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141
Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (51 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114
Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com>
Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (54 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de>
Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (73 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f41f3f373dd72344c65d801d6381fe83ef3a2c54
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (84 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (102 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (97 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (113 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (132 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31
Submitter : <dave.mueller@gmx.ch>
Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (20 days old)
Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel@tudelft.nl>
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51412/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com>
Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (41 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137
Subject : usb console regressions
Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4
Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (75 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-10-26 170 37 32
2009-10-12 161 45 35
2009-10-02 151 49 42
2009-09-06 123 34 27
2009-08-26 108 33 26
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14446
Subject : battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too)
Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-20 08:25 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417
Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Subject : Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
Submitter : Bernhard <berndl81@gmx.at>
Date : 2009-10-14 11:17 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400
Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k
Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (14 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data
Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388
Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31
Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (20 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385
Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption?
Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net>
Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265
Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257
Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System
Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252
Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (37 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249
Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248
Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl>
Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204
Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181
Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown
Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org>
Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (42 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157
Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (46 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141
Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (51 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114
Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com>
Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (54 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de>
Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (73 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f41f3f373dd72344c65d801d6381fe83ef3a2c54
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (84 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (102 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (97 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (113 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (132 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31
Submitter : <dave.mueller@gmx.ch>
Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (20 days old)
Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel@tudelft.nl>
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51412/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com>
Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (41 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137
Subject : usb console regressions
Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4
Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (75 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13645] NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, poornima nayak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (132 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Niel Lambrechts
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (113 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14017] _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Hannes Reinecke
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (75 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (97 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13836] suspend script fails, related to stdout?
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas M.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (102 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli, Luis R. Rodriguez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13987] Received NMI interrupt at resume
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Casteyde, Johannes Berg,
John W. Linville, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (73 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f41f3f373dd72344c65d801d6381fe83ef3a2c54
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Al Viro, Martin-Éric Racine
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Clemens Eisserer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (84 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (97 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14017] _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Hannes Reinecke
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (75 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Al Viro, Martin-Éric Racine
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris, Grant Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson-1HOZaDBbGgxaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14114] Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tsvety Petrov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114
Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov-qXmYkbEmOXkAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (54 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-27 14:33 ` Eric Paris
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Joerg Platte
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de>
Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris, Grant Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14114] Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tsvety Petrov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114
Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com>
Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (54 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14137] usb console regressions
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jason Wessel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137
Subject : usb console regressions
Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4
Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14141] order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Frans Pop, Pekka Enberg,
Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141
Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (51 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14157] end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jiri.harcarik
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157
Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (46 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14181] b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jeremy Huddleston
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181
Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown
Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org>
Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (42 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14157] end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jiri.harcarik
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157
Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (46 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14248] 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jurriaan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248
Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14204] MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, GNUtoo, Ingo Molnar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204
Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo-n+LsquliYkMdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14248] 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jurriaan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248
Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl>
Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (44 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14204] MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, GNUtoo, Ingo Molnar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204
Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14249] BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bastian Blank, Trond Myklebust
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249
Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian-yyjItF7Rl6lg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14252] WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Stephan von Krawczynski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252
Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw-DcQCyzbjH0jQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (37 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14252] WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Stephan von Krawczynski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252
Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (37 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14249] BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bastian Blank, Trond Myklebust
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249
Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14253] Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frederik Deweerdt, Lars Ericsson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson-zq6IREYz3ykAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (41 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14253] Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frederik Deweerdt, Lars Ericsson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com>
Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (41 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14257] Not able to boot on 32 bit System
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rishikesh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257
Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System
Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (36 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14258] Memory leak in SCSI initialization
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Michael Ellerman,
Tetsuo Handa
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51412/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14258] Memory leak in SCSI initialization
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Michael Ellerman,
Tetsuo Handa
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51412/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-28 23:36 ` Karol Lewandowski
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Karol Lewandowski, Mel Gorman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265
Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:57 ` Kristoffer Ericson
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, John W. Linville,
Justin P. Mattock, Kristoffer Ericson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14340] speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, dave.mueller-OI3hZJvNYWs, Eric Pielbug,
Rusty Russell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31
Submitter : <dave.mueller-OI3hZJvNYWs@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (20 days old)
Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel-hGVxb2UgFK3z+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14294] kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, David Miller,
Santiago Garcia Mantinan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty-gaW6/AuhO2xeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14340] speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, dave.mueller, Eric Pielbug, Rusty Russell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
Subject : speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31
Submitter : <dave.mueller@gmx.ch>
Date : 2009-10-07 08:16 (20 days old)
Handled-By : Eric Pielbug <e.a.b.piel@tudelft.nl>
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/54672/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14294] kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, David Miller,
Santiago Garcia Mantinan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net>
Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14391] use after free of struct powernow_k8_data
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Michal Schmidt,
Naga Chumbalkar, Rusty Russell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data
Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 22:25 ` Boyan
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Boyan, Dmitry Torokhov, Ed Tomlinson,
Frédéric L. W. Meunier, Justin P. Mattock,
Linus Torvalds, OGAWA Hirofumi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388
Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31
Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (20 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14385] DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption?
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andy Isaacson, Chris Wright
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14385
Subject : DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption?
Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Date : 2009-10-08 23:56 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125504643703877&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14391] use after free of struct powernow_k8_data
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Michal Schmidt,
Naga Chumbalkar, Rusty Russell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Subject : use after free of struct powernow_k8_data
Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 14:51 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125380383515615&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14400] disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Bumke
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400
Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k
Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (14 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14417] [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eddy Petrișor
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417
Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
Submitter : Eddy Petri»ôor <eddy.petrisor+linbug-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (11 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14402] Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bernhard
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Subject : Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
Submitter : Bernhard <berndl81-RbZlAiThDcE@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-10-14 11:17 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14402] Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bernhard
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
Subject : Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
Submitter : Bernhard <berndl81@gmx.at>
Date : 2009-10-14 11:17 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14417] [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
@ 2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eddy Petrișor
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417
Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (11 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14446] battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too)
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eddy Petrișor
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14446
Subject : battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too)
Submitter : Eddy Petri»ôor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-20 08:25 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14446] battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too)
@ 2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eddy Petrișor
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14446
Subject : battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too)
Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-20 08:25 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14476] Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Stephan von Krawczynski, Trond Myklebust
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw-DcQCyzbjH0jQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Robert Hancock
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14476] Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping
@ 2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Stephan von Krawczynski, Trond Myklebust
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14476
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-10-14 9:53 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125551421405656&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
@ 2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Robert Hancock
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 19:48 ` John W. Linville
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2009-10-26 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless
Several wireless ones...
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:26:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14417
> Subject : [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading)
> Submitter : Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor+linbug@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-10-16 11:07 (11 days old)
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14402
> Subject : Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ
> Submitter : Bernhard <berndl81@gmx.at>
> Date : 2009-10-14 11:17 (13 days old)
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14400
> Subject : disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k
> Submitter : Daniel Bumke <danielbumke@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-10-13 12:35 (14 days old)
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
> Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
> Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248
> Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
> Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl>
> Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (44 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181
> Subject : b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown
> Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org>
> Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (42 days old)
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141
> Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
> Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
> Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (51 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/2/86
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/5/24
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.1/01395.html
> Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (82 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:51 ` Eric Paris
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-10-26 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris,
Grant Wilson
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:31 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
Should have been fixed by:
9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855
At least I have my fingers crossed hoping so. I can't make it happen
with that patch.
-Eric
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
> Subject : Oops in fsnotify
> Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson-1HOZaDBbGgxaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify
@ 2009-10-26 19:51 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-10-26 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris,
Grant Wilson
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:31 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
Should have been fixed by:
9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855
At least I have my fingers crossed hoping so. I can't make it happen
with that patch.
-Eric
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
> Subject : Oops in fsnotify
> Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
> Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (68 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 19:57 ` Kristoffer Ericson
2009-10-26 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Kristoffer Ericson @ 2009-10-26 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
John W. Linville, Justin P. Mattock
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:31:55 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
> Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
> Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
>
>
Still valid and should remain.
--
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify
2009-10-26 19:51 ` Eric Paris
@ 2009-10-26 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris,
Grant Wilson
On Monday 26 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:31 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>
> Should have been fixed by:
> 9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855
>
> At least I have my fingers crossed hoping so. I can't make it happen
> with that patch.
OK, closing.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify
@ 2009-10-26 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Eric Paris,
Grant Wilson
On Monday 26 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:31 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>
> Should have been fixed by:
> 9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855
>
> At least I have my fingers crossed hoping so. I can't make it happen
> with that patch.
OK, closing.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
2009-10-26 19:57 ` Kristoffer Ericson
@ 2009-10-26 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kristoffer Ericson
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
John W. Linville, Justin P. Mattock
On Monday 26 October 2009, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:31:55 +0100 (CET)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
> > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
> > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
> >
> >
>
> Still valid and should remain.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 21:32 ` Martin-Éric Racine
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-10-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
I do not recall anyone on LKML actually ever doing any work towards
fixing this issue so, yes, it is still open.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> Subject : x86 Geode issue
> Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-10-26 21:32 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-10-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
I do not recall anyone on LKML actually ever doing any work towards
fixing this issue so, yes, it is still open.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> Subject : x86 Geode issue
> Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-10-26 21:32 ` Martin-Éric Racine
@ 2009-10-26 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
On Monday 26 October 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I do not recall anyone on LKML actually ever doing any work towards
> fixing this issue so, yes, it is still open.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> > Subject : x86 Geode issue
> > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-10-26 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-26 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Al Viro
On Monday 26 October 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I do not recall anyone on LKML actually ever doing any work towards
> fixing this issue so, yes, it is still open.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> > Subject : x86 Geode issue
> > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (85 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 22:25 ` Boyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Boyan @ 2009-10-26 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Ed Tomlinson, "Frédéric L. W. Meunier",
Justin P. Mattock, Linus Torvalds, OGAWA Hirofumi
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388
> Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31
> Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (20 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4
>
I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-26 22:25 ` Boyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Boyan @ 2009-10-26 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Ed Tomlinson, "Frédéric L. W. Meunier",
Justin P. Mattock, Linus Torvalds, OGAWA Hirofumi
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14388
> Subject : keyboard under X with 2.6.31
> Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-10-07 20:19 (20 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e043e42bdb66885b3ac10d27a01ccb9972e2b0a3
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125494753228217&w=4
>
I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
2009-10-26 22:25 ` Boyan
@ 2009-10-26 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2009-10-26 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boyan
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dmitry Torokhov, Ed Tomlinson,
"Frédéric L. W. Meunier", Justin P. Mattock,
OGAWA Hirofumi
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Boyan wrote:
>
> I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
It was fixed by mainline commit c8e33141911bf8fe87dc6c92793b9a59b2be0130
("tty: Make flush_to_ldisc() locking more robust"), which got back-ported
to 2.6.31.5 as commit 86d23a057.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-26 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2009-10-26 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boyan
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dmitry Torokhov, Ed Tomlinson,
"Frédéric L. W. Meunier", Justin P. Mattock,
OGAWA Hirofumi
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Boyan wrote:
>
> I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
It was fixed by mainline commit c8e33141911bf8fe87dc6c92793b9a59b2be0130
("tty: Make flush_to_ldisc() locking more robust"), which got back-ported
to 2.6.31.5 as commit 86d23a057.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
2009-10-26 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
(?)
@ 2009-10-26 23:45 ` Ed Tomlinson
[not found] ` <200910261945.58027.edt-Yad3+ZauZac@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Ed Tomlinson @ 2009-10-26 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Boyan, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Frédéric L. W. Meunier, Justin P. Mattock,
OGAWA Hirofumi
On Monday 26 October 2009 18:45:27 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Boyan wrote:
> >
> > I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
>
> It was fixed by mainline commit c8e33141911bf8fe87dc6c92793b9a59b2be0130
> ("tty: Make flush_to_ldisc() locking more robust"), which got back-ported
> to 2.6.31.5 as commit 86d23a057.
I can confirm that the keyboard is no longer missbehaving here with 31.5
Ed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-26 23:48 ` Robert Hancock
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hancock @ 2009-10-26 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
> Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
> Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
patches touch inotify..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
@ 2009-10-26 23:48 ` Robert Hancock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Robert Hancock @ 2009-10-26 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
> Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
> Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
patches touch inotify..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
2009-10-26 23:45 ` Ed Tomlinson
@ 2009-10-27 4:34 ` Justin P. Mattock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2009-10-27 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ed Tomlinson
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Boyan, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
"Frédéric L. W. Meunier", OGAWA Hirofumi
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2009 18:45:27 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Boyan wrote:
>>
>>> I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
>>>
>> It was fixed by mainline commit c8e33141911bf8fe87dc6c92793b9a59b2be0130
>> ("tty: Make flush_to_ldisc() locking more robust"), which got back-ported
>> to 2.6.31.5 as commit 86d23a057.
>>
>
> I can confirm that the keyboard is no longer missbehaving here with 31.5
>
> Ed
>
>
I guess there you have it... everybody
confirms this is fixed.
safe to say yes close, but not until the patch
has been pushed to the main tree..
cheers
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-27 4:34 ` Justin P. Mattock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2009-10-27 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ed Tomlinson
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Boyan, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
"Frédéric L. W. Meunier", OGAWA Hirofumi
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2009 18:45:27 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Boyan wrote:
>>
>>> I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
>>>
>> It was fixed by mainline commit c8e33141911bf8fe87dc6c92793b9a59b2be0130
>> ("tty: Make flush_to_ldisc() locking more robust"), which got back-ported
>> to 2.6.31.5 as commit 86d23a057.
>>
>
> I can confirm that the keyboard is no longer missbehaving here with 31.5
>
> Ed
>
>
I guess there you have it... everybody
confirms this is fixed.
safe to say yes close, but not until the patch
has been pushed to the main tree..
cheers
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
2009-10-26 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
(?)
(?)
@ 2009-10-27 8:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Boyan, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Dmitry Torokhov, Ed Tomlinson, Frédéric L. W. Meunier,
Justin P. Mattock, OGAWA Hirofumi
On Monday 26 October 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Boyan wrote:
> >
> > I think it is fixed in 2.6.31.5. I can't reproduce the problem with it.
>
> It was fixed by mainline commit c8e33141911bf8fe87dc6c92793b9a59b2be0130
> ("tty: Make flush_to_ldisc() locking more robust"), which got back-ported
> to 2.6.31.5 as commit 86d23a057.
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-26 23:48 ` Robert Hancock
@ 2009-10-27 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Hancock; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
> > Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
> > Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
>
> This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
> try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
> patches touch inotify..
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
@ 2009-10-27 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Hancock; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
> > Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
> > Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
>
> This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
> try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
> patches touch inotify..
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-27 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2009-10-27 14:32 ` Eric Paris
[not found] ` <7e0fb38c0910270732p3a7098d3jc6334e417320295d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 164+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-10-27 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
>> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>> >
>> >
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
>> > Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
>> > Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
>> > Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
>>
>> This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
>> try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
>> patches touch inotify..
It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
call this a regression, you guys tell me.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-27 14:33 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-10-27 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Joerg Platte
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
> Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
> Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla-ilKWAAXSMVN6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
should be fixed by: 9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855 in linus' tree
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
@ 2009-10-27 14:33 ` Eric Paris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Eric Paris @ 2009-10-27 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Joerg Platte
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
> Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
> Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de>
> Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
should be fixed by: 9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855 in linus' tree
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
2009-10-27 14:33 ` Eric Paris
@ 2009-10-27 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Joerg Platte
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
> > Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
> > Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla-ilKWAAXSMVN6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
>
> should be fixed by: 9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855 in linus' tree
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
@ 2009-10-27 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Joerg Platte
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
> > Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
> > Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de>
> > Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (58 days old)
>
> should be fixed by: 9f0d793b52eb2266359661369ef6303838904855 in linus' tree
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-27 14:32 ` Eric Paris
@ 2009-10-27 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris; +Cc: Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
> >> > Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
> >> > Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> > Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
> >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
> >>
> >> This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
> >> try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
> >> patches touch inotify..
>
> It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
> could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
> they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
>
> a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
> know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
> call this a regression, you guys tell me.
Yes, we do, AFAICS. The policy is not to break user space, even if it happens
to work by accident.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
@ 2009-10-27 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-27 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Paris; +Cc: Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14474
> >> > Subject : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
> >> > Submitter : Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
> >> > Date : 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old)
> >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125565159520489&w=4
> >>
> >> This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely
> >> try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5
> >> patches touch inotify..
>
> It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
> could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
> they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
>
> a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
> know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
> call this a regression, you guys tell me.
Yes, we do, AFAICS. The policy is not to break user space, even if it happens
to work by accident.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-27 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-28 12:59 ` jim owens
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: jim owens @ 2009-10-28 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Eric Paris, Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
>> It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
>> could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
>> they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
>>
>> a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
>> know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
>> call this a regression, you guys tell me.
>
> Yes, we do, AFAICS. The policy is not to break user space, even if it happens
> to work by accident.
But if we make a rule of "never break even bad user programs" then
we also should never plug security holes because that breaks a
user program expecting that attack vector :)
Silly example, but the point is we need to decide if the
user program would have done something wrong eventually
anyway (as in if the system was up long enough, they would
have hit a duplicate id and failed with the old kernel) so
the kernel change just makes it easy to hit the user code bug.
jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
@ 2009-10-28 12:59 ` jim owens
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: jim owens @ 2009-10-28 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Eric Paris, Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
>> It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
>> could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
>> they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
>>
>> a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
>> know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
>> call this a regression, you guys tell me.
>
> Yes, we do, AFAICS. The policy is not to break user space, even if it happens
> to work by accident.
But if we make a rule of "never break even bad user programs" then
we also should never plug security holes because that breaks a
user program expecting that attack vector :)
Silly example, but the point is we need to decide if the
user program would have done something wrong eventually
anyway (as in if the system was up long enough, they would
have hit a duplicate id and failed with the old kernel) so
the kernel change just makes it easy to hit the user code bug.
jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
2009-10-28 12:59 ` jim owens
@ 2009-10-28 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-28 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jim owens
Cc: Eric Paris, Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, jim owens wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> >> It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
> >> could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
> >> they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
> >>
> >> a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
> >> know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
> >> call this a regression, you guys tell me.
> >
> > Yes, we do, AFAICS. The policy is not to break user space, even if it happens
> > to work by accident.
>
> But if we make a rule of "never break even bad user programs" then
> we also should never plug security holes because that breaks a
> user program expecting that attack vector :)
Well, that's why this rule is not carved in stone.
Clearly, there are some cases in which we can't afford keeping the buggy user
space happy, not only security-related.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression?
@ 2009-10-28 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-28 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jim owens
Cc: Eric Paris, Robert Hancock, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 28 October 2009, jim owens wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> >> It's a restorecond bug. restorecon acted as if watch descriptors
> >> could never be reused. They weren't on old kernels and it's possible
> >> they are reused now. Restorecon was fixed.
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=125380417916233&w=2
> >>
> >> a change in the kernel caused a buggy userspace program to break. I
> >> know how to put the kernel back the way it was, but I don't know if we
> >> call this a regression, you guys tell me.
> >
> > Yes, we do, AFAICS. The policy is not to break user space, even if it happens
> > to work by accident.
>
> But if we make a rule of "never break even bad user programs" then
> we also should never plug security holes because that breaks a
> user program expecting that attack vector :)
Well, that's why this rule is not carved in stone.
Clearly, there are some cases in which we can't afford keeping the buggy user
space happy, not only security-related.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-10-28 23:36 ` Karol Lewandowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Karol Lewandowski @ 2009-10-28 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Karol Lewandowski,
Mel Gorman
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265
> Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
> Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (42 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4
Bug is still present in 2.6.32-rc5.
(I'm currently testing Mel's patches.)
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
@ 2009-10-28 23:36 ` Karol Lewandowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Karol Lewandowski @ 2009-10-28 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Karol Lewandowski,
Mel Gorman
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265
> Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
> Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (42 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4
Bug is still present in 2.6.32-rc5.
(I'm currently testing Mel's patches.)
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (43 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-05 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jack@suse.cz
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-11-05 16:07:31 ---
Eric, have you succeeded in reproducing this?
What seems to happen is that while we are in ext3_put_super(), there are still
some inode references held and therefore the inodes (regular files) don't get
deleted and we complain about them in ext3_put_super. The question is who holds
the reference... I did a quick audit of the code and couldn't find iget()
unmatched with iput() or a similar problem.
I guess I can create a debugging patch which might be able to show us who holds
the reference. Will try to code it next week. Mikael, will you be able to run
such debugging patch?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (42 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-05 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #7 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> 2009-11-05 16:13:15 ---
Jan, nope haven't, to be honest fell off my radar as I was looking at that ext4
corruption. I've not tried to reproduce it yet.
Sorry,
-Eric
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (41 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-11 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #8 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-11-11 15:27:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=23749)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23749)
Patch reporting lost inode references
This patch reports more information about inodes left in orphan list.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (40 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-11 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #9 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-11-11 15:29:18 ---
Mikael, could you please run a kernel with the above patch and post here
resulting messages during umount and also attach here your System.map file from
the tested kernel? Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-11-16 22:58 2.6.32-rc7-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-16 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (39 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-20 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tytso@mit.edu
--- Comment #10 from Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> 2009-11-20 15:11:21 ---
Hi Mikael,
Have you had a chance to try running a kernel with Jan's debugging patch?
Is this a problem you can reproduce reliably, or was it a one-off?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-11-21 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe-1zs4UD6AkMk@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
Still occurs with kernel 2.6.32-rc8.
This time I only rebuilt the glibc src rpm, which also runs its
test suite, but I did not install the new glibc binaries before
the shutdown -r.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
@ 2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2009-11-21 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
Still occurs with kernel 2.6.32-rc8.
This time I only rebuilt the glibc src rpm, which also runs its
test suite, but I did not install the new glibc binaries before
the shutdown -r.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (38 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-11-21 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #11 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> 2009-11-21 14:27:39 ---
On Saturday 21 November 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (57 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
>
> Still occurs with kernel 2.6.32-rc8.
>
> This time I only rebuilt the glibc src rpm, which also runs its
> test suite, but I did not install the new glibc binaries before
> the shutdown -r.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-11-21 14:59 2.6.32-rc8-git1: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-11-21 15:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-11-21 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mikael Pettersson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (62 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (37 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-08 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikpe@it.uu.se
--- Comment #12 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-12-08 11:12:19 ---
Ah, I've noticed that Mikael was not on CC of this bug so he didn't see my
messages. Mikael, could you please try running the debugging patch from comment
#8/#9? Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (36 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-08 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-12-08 11:47:41 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Ah, I've noticed that Mikael was not on CC of this bug so he didn't see my
> messages. Mikael, could you please try running the debugging patch from comment
> #8/#9? Thanks.
I'll test the debug patch this weekend, right now I'm away from the machines
that trigger the problem.
(Since I issued all my bug reports on LKML it never occurred to me to add a cc:
to myself in this bugzilla entry. Sorry about that.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (35 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-14 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-12-14 12:40:25 ---
With Jan Kara'a debugging patch on top of 2.6.32 final I get the following
after shutdown -r:
Unmounting file systems: sb orphan head is 22
sb_info orphan list:
inode sda2:22 at cc7c1618: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 13, i_count=2501
dentry=
NULL
iget IPs:
c009e590,
c009dd08,
inode sda2:13 at d1d932b8: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 12, i_count=2 dentry=
NULL
iget IPs:
c009e590,
c009dd08,
inode sda2:12 at d1de0618: mode 100600, nlink 0, next 0, i_count=1 dentry=
NULL
iget IPs:
c009e590,
c009dd08,
kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:450!
c009e590 is fs/fs-writeback.c:writeback_inodes_wb(), line 681.
c009dd08 is fs/fs-writeback.c:wait_sb_inodes(), line 1170.
I get this with both gcc-4.3.4 and gcc-4.4.2 compiled kernels.
On a second machine I got a similar result, except the three inodes had only
one iget IP recorded, and it was the one in writeback_inodes_wb().
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (34 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-14 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |axboe@kernel.dk
--- Comment #15 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2009-12-14 14:46:07 ---
Thanks for the debugging. So the problematic files were regular files that lead
pretty simple life - no references from unexpected places or so. What catches
my eye is that inode numbers are surprisingly small (22, 12, 13; in your
original report 17, 15). Since normal inode numbers start by 11 and that is
usually taken by lost+found, numbers 12 and 13 are as small as they can get. I
suppose this is a filesystem dedicated for the build, isn't it? And the files
making problems are created as a first files on that filesystem in its root
directory. Any idea what those files are?
Another thing: i_count=2501 for inode 22 is absurdly high. We'd have to leak
references really heavily for that file.
I've checked the code in writeback_inodes_wb() and wait_sb_inodes() but
reference counting there looks fine. So I have no clue what's going on right
now. Anyway, adding Jens to CC just in case it rings a bell to him.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (33 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-15 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2009-12-15 09:08:45 ---
The affected file system is /tmp. There's nothing special about it, except it
being separate from / and /home. The builds are plain "rpmbuild --rebuild" so
they do most accesses under /usr/src/ and /var/tmp/, both on /, but the glibc
test suite will create temporary files on /tmp. I have no idea what those files
are.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (32 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2009-12-29 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |carlos.velasco@nimastelecom
| |.com
--- Comment #17 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2009-12-29 13:18:03 ---
I have reproduced the exact same problem in a new LFS system using 2.6.32.2
kernel.
The bug is definitely triggered but issuing a "make check" of eglibc before a
reboot. You do not need to install it or just build it, whatever triggers this
bug is related to something that eglibc makes during tests.
---
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 253, 3 Dec 29 2009 /dev/dm-3
brw------- 1 root root 253, 3 Dec 29 2009 LV0-tmp
Unmounting all other currently mounted file systems...
/etc/rc.d/rc6.d/S70mountfs: line 18: 22979 Segmentation fault umount -a -d
-r > /dev/null
[ FAIL ]
[ 903.074244] sb orphan head is 13
[ 903.088507] sb_info orphan list:
[ 903.102590] inode dm-3:13 at ffff880114948a10: mode 100600, nlink 0, next
12
[ 903.131992] inode dm-3:12 at ffff880114907340: mode 100600, nlink 0, next
0
[ 903.149056] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 903.149057] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435!
[ 903.149058] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 903.149060] last sysfs file: /sys/class/net/bonding_masters
[ 903.149061] CPU 2
[ 903.149062] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 bnx2 usbhid button hpilo
[ 903.149067] Pid: 22979, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32.2 #1 ProLiant DL360
G6
[ 903.149068] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8117d883>] [<ffffffff8117d883>]
ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[ 903.149075] RSP: 0018:ffff88011cd6be28 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 903.149076] RAX: ffff8801149489c8 RBX: ffff88011d857e00 RCX:
ffffffff815e0800
[ 903.149077] RDX: 00000000007f3f13 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI:
ffffffff816dc130
[ 903.149078] RBP: ffff88011cd6be58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000001
[ 903.149080] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000e200000 R12:
ffff88011d3db400
[ 903.149081] R13: ffff88011d857f98 R14: ffff88011d857f98 R15:
ffff88011d0cc060
[ 903.149083] FS: 00007f9f88456730(0000) GS:ffff88002c040000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 903.149084] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[ 903.149086] CR2: 00007f9f8845c000 CR3: 000000011dc84000 CR4:
00000000000006e0
[ 903.149087] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[ 903.149088] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[ 903.149090] Process umount (pid: 22979, threadinfo ffff88011cd6a000, task
ffff88011d0cc060)
[ 903.149091] Stack:
[ 903.149092] ffff880100000000 ffff88011d3db400 ffff88011d3db400
ffffffff814a4ac0
[ 903.149094] <0> ffffffff8163d1b8 ffff88011d3db400 ffff88011cd6be78
ffffffff810f6cc1
[ 903.149096] <0> ffff88011f29de40 0000000000000003 ffff88011cd6be98
ffffffff810f6d8c
[ 903.149098] Call Trace:
[ 903.149104] [<ffffffff810f6cc1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0
[ 903.149106] [<ffffffff810f6d8c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50
[ 903.149109] [<ffffffff810f81ea>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0
[ 903.149112] [<ffffffff81113d6e>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0
[ 903.149114] [<ffffffff8111518e>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460
[ 903.149117] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 903.149118] Code: c7 b1 de 54 81 31 c0 e8 3c 4d 30 00 4c 8b b3 98 01 00 00
49 8b 06 4d 39 f5 0f 18 08 75 11 4c 3b ab 98 01 00 00 0f 84 c4 fe ff ff <0f> 0b
eb fe 49 8d 46 80 49 8d 4e 48 48 8b b0 c8 01 00 00 44 8b
[ 903.149131] RIP [<ffffffff8117d883>] ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[ 903.149134] RSP <ffff88011cd6be28>
[ 903.159165] ---[ end trace 3ed92bd591190341 ]---
[ 903.159166] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 903.159169] WARNING: at kernel/exit.c:895 do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0()
[ 903.159170] Hardware name: ProLiant DL360 G6
[ 903.159171] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 bnx2 usbhid button hpilo
[ 903.159175] Pid: 22979, comm: umount Tainted: G D 2.6.32.2 #1
[ 903.159176] Call Trace:
[ 903.159179] [<ffffffff8104c218>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xf0
[ 903.159181] [<ffffffff8104c29f>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20
[ 903.159183] [<ffffffff81050fca>] do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0
[ 903.159187] [<ffffffff8106de01>] ? down_trylock+0x31/0x50
[ 903.159190] [<ffffffff81010305>] oops_end+0x75/0xa0
[ 903.159192] [<ffffffff810108a1>] die+0xd1/0x110
[ 903.159194] [<ffffffff8100d0d4>] do_trap+0xc4/0x170
[ 903.159196] [<ffffffff8100d580>] do_invalid_op+0x90/0xb0
[ 903.159198] [<ffffffff8117d883>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[ 903.159200] [<ffffffff8100c815>] invalid_op+0x15/0x20
[ 903.159203] [<ffffffff8117d883>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[ 903.159205] [<ffffffff8117d8c7>] ? ext3_put_super+0x277/0x280
[ 903.159207] [<ffffffff810f6cc1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0
[ 903.159209] [<ffffffff810f6d8c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50
[ 903.159211] [<ffffffff810f81ea>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0
[ 903.159213] [<ffffffff81113d6e>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0
[ 903.159215] [<ffffffff8111518e>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460
[ 903.159217] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 903.159218] ---[ end trace 3ed92bd591190342 ]---
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (31 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-11 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #18 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-11 21:59:30 ---
Guys, I'm having problems reproducing this. I've checked out 2.10 version of
eglibc but when I run "make check" I get error on:
GCONV_PATH=/local/test1/build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C
LOCPATH=/local/test1/build/localedata
/local/test1/build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path
/local/test1/build:/local/test1/build/math:/local/test1/build/elf:/local/test1/build/dlfcn:/local/test1/build/nss:/local/test1/build/nis:/local/test1/build/rt:/local/test1/build/resolv:/local/test1/build/crypt:/local/test1/build/nptl
/local/test1/build/localedata/tst_mblen
probably because of:
mblen:de_DE.ISO-8859-1:1:1:2:F:the return value is different from an expected
value
When I configure the package without TLS, I cannot get even that far... So
could you either provide me with a simpler reproduction case or tell me how to
make "make check" do what I need? Thanks...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (30 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-11 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #19 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-11 22:55:40 ---
Jan,
You usually run glibc checks with -k (some errors are usual and recurring):
make -k check
You can follow CLFS/LFS guideline here using the pre-downloaded version of
eglibc and patches:
http://cross-lfs.org/view/svn/x86_64/final-system/eglibc-64bit.html
Regards,
Carlos Velasco
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (29 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #20 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-12 16:03:29 ---
OK, now "make -k check" have been doing something for a reasonable time but I
don't see problems with orphan files you see. Only at the end there are a few
ld-linux-... processes hanging so that I cannot umount the filesystem (I have
to kill them to umount the filesystem) - do you also observe such processes?
Also if you can still reproduce the problem - could you please find which test
does exactly cause the problem so that I can concentrate on it? Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (28 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #21 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-12 17:30:52 ---
I don't see any ld-linux process after make -k check
bash-4.0# ps -ef | grep -i ld-linux
root 13640 18376 0 18:27 ? 00:00:00 grep -i ld-linux
bash-4.0# umount /tmp
[435397.580983] sb orphan head is 14
[435397.595803] sb_info orphan list:
[435397.611165] inode dm-3:14 at ffff8800c7880d28: mode 100600, nlink 0, next
13
[435397.639671] inode dm-3:13 at ffff8800df2566e0: mode 100600, nlink 0, next
12
[435397.672072] inode dm-3:12 at ffff8800df2560b0: mode 100600, nlink 0, next
0
bash-4.0# [435397.672080] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[435397.672082] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435!
[435397.672083] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[435397.672085] last sysfs file: /sys/class/net/bonding_masters
[435397.672086] CPU 2
[435397.672087] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 usbhid bnx2 hpilo button
[435397.672092] Pid: 13641, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32.3 #1 ProLiant DL360
G6
[435397.672093] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8117da53>] [<ffffffff8117da53>]
ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[435397.672099] RSP: 0018:ffff88011cda5e28 EFLAGS: 00010206
[435397.672101] RAX: ffff8800c7880ce0 RBX: ffff88011cd54e00 RCX:
000000000001055f
[435397.672102] RDX: 0000000000004646 RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI:
ffffffff815e6330
[435397.672104] RBP: ffff88011cda5e58 R08: 000000000001055e R09:
ffffffff816dd240
[435397.672105] R10: 0000000000000013 R11: ffffffff816dd240 R12:
ffff88011d13b400
[435397.672106] R13: ffff88011cd54f98 R14: ffff88011cd54f98 R15:
ffff88011d3e1350
[435397.672108] FS: 00007f910e82b730(0000) GS:ffff88002c040000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[435397.672110] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[435397.672111] CR2: 00007f910dedb32e CR3: 000000011cf65000 CR4:
00000000000006e0
[435397.672112] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[435397.672114] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[435397.672116] Process umount (pid: 13641, threadinfo ffff88011cda4000, task
ffff88011d3e1350)
[435397.672117] Stack:
[435397.672118] ffff880100000000 ffff88011d13b400 ffff88011d13b400
ffffffff814a4ac0
[435397.672120] <0> ffffffff8163d1b8 ffff88011d13b400 ffff88011cda5e78
ffffffff810f6cd1
[435397.672121] <0> ffff88011f016180 0000000000000003 ffff88011cda5e98
ffffffff810f6d9c
[435397.672124] Call Trace:
[435397.672130] [<ffffffff810f6cd1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0
[435397.672132] [<ffffffff810f6d9c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50
[435397.672134] [<ffffffff810f81fa>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0
[435397.672137] [<ffffffff81113dce>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0
[435397.672140] [<ffffffff811151ee>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460
[435397.672143] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[435397.672144] Code: c7 41 df 54 81 31 c0 e8 b7 52 30 00 4c 8b b3 98 01 00 00
49 8b 06 4d 39 f5 0f 18 08 75 11 4c 3b ab 98 01 00 00 0f 84 c4 fe ff ff <0f> 0b
eb fe 49 8d 46 80 49 8d 4e 48 48 8b b0 c8 01 00 00 44 8b
[435397.672158] RIP [<ffffffff8117da53>] ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[435397.672160] RSP <ffff88011cda5e28>
[435397.682079] ---[ end trace 7a92197c0643be5c ]---
[435397.682080] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[435397.682083] WARNING: at kernel/exit.c:895 do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0()
[435397.682084] Hardware name: ProLiant DL360 G6
[435397.682085] Modules linked in: bonding ipv6 usbhid bnx2 hpilo button
[435397.682088] Pid: 13641, comm: umount Tainted: G D 2.6.32.3 #1
[435397.682090] Call Trace:
[435397.682093] [<ffffffff8104c208>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xf0
[435397.682095] [<ffffffff8104c28f>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20
[435397.682097] [<ffffffff81050fba>] do_exit+0x94a/0x9e0
[435397.682100] [<ffffffff8106ddf1>] ? down_trylock+0x31/0x50
[435397.682104] [<ffffffff81010305>] oops_end+0x75/0xa0
[435397.682106] [<ffffffff810108a1>] die+0xd1/0x110
[435397.682108] [<ffffffff8100d0d4>] do_trap+0xc4/0x170
[435397.682110] [<ffffffff8100d580>] do_invalid_op+0x90/0xb0
[435397.682112] [<ffffffff8117da53>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[435397.682114] [<ffffffff8106ddf1>] ? down_trylock+0x31/0x50
[435397.682117] [<ffffffff8100c815>] invalid_op+0x15/0x20
[435397.682119] [<ffffffff8117da53>] ? ext3_put_super+0x233/0x280
[435397.682121] [<ffffffff8117da97>] ? ext3_put_super+0x277/0x280
[435397.682123] [<ffffffff810f6cd1>] generic_shutdown_super+0x51/0xf0
[435397.682126] [<ffffffff810f6d9c>] kill_block_super+0x2c/0x50
[435397.682128] [<ffffffff810f81fa>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0xf0
[435397.682130] [<ffffffff81113dce>] mntput_no_expire+0x9e/0xf0
[435397.682132] [<ffffffff811151ee>] sys_umount+0x5e/0x460
[435397.682134] [<ffffffff8100baeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[435397.682135] ---[ end trace 7a92197c0643be5d ]---
There are many many tests, difficult finding which one.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (27 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #22 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-12 20:12:39 ---
Hmm, strange. I've now downloaded eglibc 2.10.1 from the site you pointed to
and followed instructions there. Now I don't have any ld-linux hung processes
and everything seems to finish fine but still no luck in reproducing the
problem.
About finding which test is causing this: I suppose you could easily disable
tests from different directories and the when you find in which directory the
problematic test is, you could do a binary search on tests. But I understand
it's quite a bit of work...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (26 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-12 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #23 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-12 23:25:48 ---
It is something in the nptl (threads) subdir tests.
eglibc-build/nptl# make subdir=nptl -C ../../eglibc-2.10.1/nptl
objdir=/compile/eglibc-build tests
...
eglibc-build/nptl# umount /tmp
Segmentation fault
Not sure about how to isolate the exact test from here now... will try to do my
best.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (25 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-13 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #24 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-13 00:34:00 ---
Found. It is the test "tst-mutexpi9".
eglibc-2.10.1/nptl# GCONV_PATH=/compile/eglibc-build/iconvdata LC_ALL=C
/compile/eglibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path
/compile/eglibc-build:/compile/eglibc-build/math:/compile/eglibc-build/elf:/compile/eglibc-build/dlfcn:/compile/eglibc-build/nss:/compile/eglibc-build/nis:/compile/eglibc-build/rt:/compile/eglibc-build/resolv:/compile/eglibc-build/crypt:/compile/eglibc-build/nptl
/compile/eglibc-build/nptl/tst-mutexpi9 >
/compile/eglibc-build/nptl/tst-mutexpi9.out
eglibc-2.10.1/nptl# umount /tmp
Segmentation fault
eglibc-2.10.1/nptl# cat /compile/eglibc-build/nptl/tst-mutexpi9.out
going to fork now
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (24 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-18 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #25 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-18 22:41:46 ---
Whohoo, reproduced! The trick was that this test is creating files in /tmp and
I was doing all the compilation (and unmounting) in a different partition than
/tmp is. Thanks for identifying the test case.
For others interested: What the test does is: It creates a temporary file,
mmaps it, deletes it, creates pthread mutex in the mmap, forks, does some mutex
locking, exits. During this process we apparently leak an inode reference, yay.
What is interesting is that when the mutex is created without priority
inheritance logic, everything works fine so there's something racy about our
pthread mutex handling in the kernel.
I'll now go and debug it more, I just wanted to share the news.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (23 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dvhltc@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #26 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-19 19:56:41 ---
OK, I've spent some time looking into this. It's definitely a futex problem -
futexes take reference to inode and apparently this test case takes some code
path where we don't drop all the inode references we have acquired. I've tried
to find that place by looking into the code but wasn't successful.
I think the problem is caused by futex rewrite that happened between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31 so I'm adding Darren to CC (who was author of most of the patches).
Darren, I'm able to reproduce the problem with 2.6.33-rc3 kernel so apparently
the problem isn't fixed yet. I'll attach here a minimal test program that
triggers the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (22 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #27 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-19 19:57:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=24639)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24639)
Test program causing lost inode references
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (21 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-19 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #28 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-19 23:24:41 ---
>From the following in the test:
mem = mmap (NULL, ps, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
this may be related to be the problem reported by Kosaki and fixed with his
patch recently pulled into tip by Ingo and sent Linus and stable. Can you try
with this patch from tip/core-fixes-for-linus?
commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5c9468114e74dc050785d
Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue Jan 5 16:32:43 2010 +0900
futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()
Currently, futexes have two problem:
A) The current futex code doesn't handle private file mappings properly.
get_futex_key() uses PageAnon() to distinguish file and
anon, which can cause the following bad scenario:
1) thread-A call futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAIT), it
sleeps on file mapping object.
2) thread-B writes a variable and it makes it cow.
3) thread-B calls futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAKE), it
wakes up blocked thread on the anonymous page. (but it's nothing)
B) Current futex code doesn't handle zero page properly.
Read mode get_user_pages() can return zero page, but current
futex code doesn't handle it at all. Then, zero page makes
infinite loop internally.
The solution is to use write mode get_user_page() always for
page lookup. It prevents the lookup of both file page of private
mappings and zero page.
Performance concerns:
Probaly very little, because glibc always initialize variables
for futex before to call futex(). It means glibc users never see
the overhead of this patch.
Compatibility concerns:
This patch has few compatibility issues. After this patch,
FUTEX_WAIT require writable access to futex variables (read-only
mappings makes EFAULT). But practically it's not a problem,
glibc always initalizes variables for futexes explicitly - nobody
uses read-only mappings.
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100105162633.45A2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (20 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #29 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-20 10:40:30 ---
I've tested a kernel I've pulled today from Linus (which has the above commit)
and it still has the issue. Note that the mapping created is shared so it's
unlikely that the above patch would really fix it...
BTW: The problem is 100% reproducible for me (and for the guys reporting it as
well) so I believe that you should see it as well with the test program.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (19 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #30 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-20 13:52:46 ---
Using the standalone test case I can reproduce the bug with all kernels back to
2.6.29, but not with 2.6.28. I'm trying a bisect now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (18 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #31 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 18:11:16 ---
Jan, I apologize, I missed the shared mapping. I wouldn't expect Kosaki's patch
to fix this. Have you experimented with the SHARED, RECURSIVE, and PRIO_INHERIT
flags of the mutexattr to see if this is the only configuration in which you
see the problem? Understanding which of these flags are required to reproduce
would help point at where to look in the code. Right now I suspect a futex key
reference imbalance in the futex_lock_pi() code path. 2.6.29 includes changes
from me on fault handling as well as key reference imbalance fixes in this
area.
Mikael, please let me know what your git bisection reveals.
I'm trying to make time to do some testing/analysis myself, but I'm being kept
very busy on other pressing issues right now, so I may not be able to respond
as quickly as I'd like.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (17 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #32 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 19:10:25 ---
I see above that PRIO_INHERIT is required, and the test depends on SHARED. I
suppose we could try with pthreads instead of fork to see if it's related to
SHARED. For now I'll start examining the futex_lock_pi() path - particular
around the signal induced wakeup.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (16 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #33 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 19:29:53 ---
Took a look at the 2.6.29 code, I believe it is possible to have an inode
reference imbalance when a fault is taken. Unfortunately, both queue_lock() and
get_futex_key() acquire references to the inode (I'd like to do away with
queue_lock() as it masks reference usage and generally complicates the
corner-case-heavy futex code). In the fault path queue_unlock() will release
the first inode reference, but if on the first attempt (attempt == 0) the
get_user() fails, we'll simply return without dropping the second reference.
Some instrumentation could confirm this. I'll take a look at later sources
which should have a significantly different fault path.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (15 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #34 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-20 19:54:37 ---
My bisection has identified the following as the culprit:
commit 38d47c1b7075bd7ec3881141bb3629da58f88dab
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Fri Sep 26 19:32:20 2008 +0200
futex: rely on get_user_pages() for shared futexes
On the way of getting rid of the mmap_sem requirement for shared futexes,
start by relying on get_user_pages().
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (14 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-20 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #35 from Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> 2010-01-20 20:09:08 ---
The fault path inode count problem appears to be fixed in 2.6.33-rc3 where the
fault logic is rewritten and and we properly account for both references taken
by queue_lock as well as get_futex_key(). Since Jan in comment #26 said he can
reproduce on 2.6.33-rc3, this isn't likely to be the path that caused the
problem. I'll continue to look.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (13 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-23 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #36 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-23 22:18:38 ---
I've posted a futex bug fix to lkml:
<http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126428261230399&w=2>
It fixed the standalone test case. I'm now doing a full glibc rebuild and test
suite run on a machine with the fixed kernel.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (12 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #37 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-24 11:28:05 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> I've posted a futex bug fix to lkml:
> <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126428261230399&w=2>
>
> It fixed the standalone test case. I'm now doing a full glibc rebuild and test
> suite run on a machine with the fixed kernel.
Completed. The patch eliminated all orphan inodes from the glibc test suite.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (11 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #38 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 17:13:44 ---
It works for me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (10 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #39 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 18:17:58 ---
Not sure about the patch.
With patch applied, after testing and installing glibc I see plenty of tmp
files left in /tmp:
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 18:56 tst-atime.HiK5Qd
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 19:07 cc2mcjSe.o
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 19:07 cc3s3qwc.c
-rw------- 1 root root 9766 Jan 24 19:07 ccNVp9dh.ld
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 24 19:07 cckbLeAj.le
I don't remember to see them without patch applied.
Also, when rebooting I see this error:
Unmounting all other currently mounted file systems...
umount: /: device is busy.
(In some cases useful info about processes that use
the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
Very odd...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (38 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #40 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 18:20:15 ---
After rebooting the temp files are gone...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (39 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-24 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #41 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-24 19:27:33 ---
Tested with unpatched kernel and the temp files are there too. Can't test the
error unmounting / because when /tmp is unmounted it gives oops. This may be
another problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (40 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #42 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-25 01:37:33 ---
Same problem using 2.6.33-rc5 with the patch.
Unmounting all other currently mounted file systems...
umount: /: device is busy.
(In some cases useful info about processes that use
the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
I don't know why but this only happens with the patch applied.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (41 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #43 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> 2010-01-25 10:28:58 ---
Please clarify exactly what you do to trigger the busy /.
Did you run the glibc test suite or the specific tst-mutex9 program?
If so, then without the futex_lock_pi() patch you wouldn't even get to a normal
shutdown due to the oops, so the busy / may be normal and caused by something
else.
Also, does the busy / prevent the shutdown from succeeding?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (42 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-25 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #44 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-25 12:07:11 ---
Carlos, EBUSY from umount usually means that some process has some file open on
the filesystem (/ in your case). Are there any usual processes running before
you run shutdown? Or maybe you could try just switching to single user mode and
then use lsof to see processes which have files open on /...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (43 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #45 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-28 17:19:13 ---
Sorry about delay, I made further tests.
I think the patch is good and this is another problem.
The oops happened during TEST of the eglibc. This has been solved by the patch.
This second issue is related to the INSTALL of the eglibc.
After "make install" and reboot I always see an umount busy message for /.
This busy message was not seen before because we stepped into the oops
umounting /tmp, before umounting /.
I tried downgrading to linux kernel 2.6.28 but I couldn't, I receive an NMI
interrupt and system hang before testing with this kernel.
So I have issued a "ps -ef" and a lsof just before the umount all.
Looking output of ps, there are no user processes apart of these:
root 30920 1 0 17:50 ttyS1 00:00:00 init [6]
root 30921 30920 0 17:50 ttyS1 00:00:00 /bin/bash /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 6
root 31085 30921 0 17:50 ttyS1 00:00:00 /bin/bash
/etc/rc.d/rc6.d/S70mou
Umount command is:
"umount -a -d -r >/dev/null"
I ONLY see this error when installing eglibc. Rebooting the system without
installing eglibc is successful without errors.
Looking into LSOF, I have been looking into differences between a "good reboot"
and a "bad reboot - umount busy". I can only see that in the "bad reboot" the
SIZE/OFF columns are empty for the new installed eglibc files.
Bad:
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
init 1 root DEL REG 253,1 887056
/lib64/libc-2.10.1.so
init 1 root DEL REG 253,1 887055 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so
Good:
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
init 1 root mem REG 253,1 1752309 887013 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so
init 1 root mem REG 253,1 149463 887007 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so
Not sure how to proceed from here. Not sure if this is an ext3 issue also...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (44 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #46 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-28 17:23:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=24757)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24757)
lsof before umount in a reboor without busy error
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (45 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #47 from carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com 2010-01-28 17:24:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=24758)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24758)
lsof before umount in a "bad" reboot with busy error
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (46 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
carlos.velasco@nimastelecom.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #24757|lsof before umount in a |lsof before umount in a
description|reboor without busy error |reboot without busy error
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (47 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-01-28 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
--- Comment #48 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-01-28 17:55:53 ---
Thanks for debugging Carlos! Note, that in the 'bad' case, the files are
deleted... When there are still open but deleted files, we cannot remount the
filesystem read-only because that would make deleting the file at closing of
the last file descriptor impossible. So what you see is an expected behavior...
Mikael, will you take care of pushing your fix to vanilla kernel and possibly
also -stable releases? Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
* [Bug 14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
` (48 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
49 siblings, 0 replies; 164+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-02-10 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fs_ext3@kernel-bugs.osdl.or |jack@suse.cz
|g |
--- Comment #49 from Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> 2010-02-10 19:15:27 ---
Rafael, the patch has been merged as 5ecb01cfdf96c5f465192bdb2a4fd4a61a24c6cc
so I'm closing the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 164+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-10 19:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 164+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-26 19:26 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:26 ` [Bug #13645] NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14017] _end symbol missing from Symbol.map Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13836] suspend script fails, related to stdout? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 21:32 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-10-26 21:32 ` Martin-Éric Racine
[not found] ` <11fae7c70910261432w27b39e92ld319487e679fccaa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-26 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #13987] Received NMI interrupt at resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14114] Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14058] Oops in fsnotify Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:51 ` Eric Paris
2009-10-26 19:51 ` Eric Paris
[not found] ` <1256586689.2775.6.camel-8EcGF3LoIElviLIMxPk1+R/sF2h8X+2i0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-26 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14090] WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-27 14:33 ` Eric Paris
2009-10-27 14:33 ` Eric Paris
[not found] ` <7e0fb38c0910270733g7b05c779m1f593529659a6ff-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-27 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14141] order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14137] usb console regressions Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14157] end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14181] b43 causes panic at ifconfig down / shutdown Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14204] MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14248] 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14252] WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14249] BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14253] Oops in driversbasefirmware_class Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14257] Not able to boot on 32 bit System Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14258] Memory leak in SCSI initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14265] ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-28 23:36 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 23:36 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:57 ` Kristoffer Ericson
2009-10-26 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14340] speedstep-ich driver not working in 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14294] kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14391] use after free of struct powernow_k8_data Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14385] DMAR regression in 2.6.31 leads to ext4 corruption? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 22:25 ` Boyan
2009-10-26 22:25 ` Boyan
[not found] ` <4AE621CB.6000700-/E1597aS9LT10XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-26 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-26 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-26 23:45 ` Ed Tomlinson
[not found] ` <200910261945.58027.edt-Yad3+ZauZac@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 4:34 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-27 4:34 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-27 8:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14400] disable/enable wlan broken with ath5k Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14417] [Regression] Wireless driver iwlagn+iwlcore doesn't work after resume (needs reloading) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` [Bug #14402] Atheros ath9k module is not working with 2.6.31.1 on an Acer Extensa 7630EZ Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:32 ` [Bug #14446] battery status info broken/useless in 2.6.32-rc3 - MSI PR200 (possibly others, too) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:32 ` [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 23:48 ` Robert Hancock
2009-10-26 23:48 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <51f3faa70910261648h242a9a2dp42cdf554a9eb1342-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-27 8:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-27 14:32 ` Eric Paris
[not found] ` <7e0fb38c0910270732p3a7098d3jc6334e417320295d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-27 20:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200910272127.40587.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-28 12:59 ` jim owens
2009-10-28 12:59 ` jim owens
[not found] ` <4AE84017.7040101-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-28 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-28 18:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:32 ` [Bug #14476] Unable to handle kernel paging request in nfs_write_mapping Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-26 19:48 ` 2.6.32-rc5-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 John W. Linville
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-21 14:59 2.6.32-rc8-git1: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-21 15:02 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-16 22:58 2.6.32-rc7-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-16 23:01 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-16 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-11-21 12:37 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-11 22:41 2.6.32-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-11 23:01 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-01 19:53 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-01 19:56 ` [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-04 17:38 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200910042249.54639.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-04 23:04 ` Mikael Pettersson
[not found] ` <19145.10741.402938.867088-tgku4HJDRZih8lFjZTKsyTAV6s6igYVG@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-09 16:40 ` Mikael Pettersson
[not found] ` <19151.26501.727411.584056-tgku4HJDRZih8lFjZTKsyTAV6s6igYVG@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-09 22:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-29 21:48 [Bug 14256] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-04 20:47 ` [Bug 14256] " bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-09 22:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-10 1:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-12 13:48 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-10-10 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-12 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-10-12 16:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-05 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-05 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-11 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-20 15:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-11-21 14:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-08 11:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-08 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-14 14:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-15 9:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2009-12-29 13:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-11 21:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-11 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 17:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 20:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-12 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-13 0:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-18 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-19 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-19 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-19 23:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 10:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 13:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 19:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 19:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-20 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-23 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 17:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 18:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-24 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-25 1:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-25 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-25 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-01-28 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-02-10 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.