From: mitchelh@codeaurora.org (Mitchel Humpherys)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: Devicetree bindings for Ion
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:34:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vnkw8u6xts6n.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c6ea0362f5336d9bc8acbfbd7ceae06@mail.ncrmnt.org> (andrew@ncrmnt.org's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:14:23 +0300")
On Tue, Oct 13 2015 at 11:14:23 AM, Andrew <andrew@ncrmnt.org> wrote:
> On 2015-10-12 21:39, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06 2015 at 05:35:41 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> + ion {
>>>> + compatbile = "linux,ion";
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + ion-system-heap {
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-id = <0>;
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_SYSTEM_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-name = "system";
>>>
>>> How does this vary across platforms? Is all of this being pushed down
>>> to DT, because there is no coordination of this at the kernel ABI
>>> level across platforms. In other words, why can't heap 0 be hardcoded
>>> as system heap in the driver. It seems to me any 1 of these 3
>>> properties could be used to derive the other 2.
>>
>> The heap-id<->heap-type mapping isn't necessarily 1:1. As Laura
>> indicated elsewhere on this thread, a given heap might need to be
>> contiguous on one platform but not on another. In that case you just
>> swap out the heap-type here and there's no need for userspace to change.
>>
>> The heap-name, OTOH, could be derived from the heap-id, which is what we
>> hackishly do here [1] and here[2].
>
> By the way, since we agreed that heap id and heap type mappings
> are not 1:1 - we have a problem with the current API.
>
> In userspace we currently have this:
>
> int ion_alloc(int fd, size_t len, size_t align, unsigned int heap_mask,
> unsigned int flags, ion_user_handle_t *handle);
>
> We do not specify here what TYPE of heap we want the allocation to come
> from.
> This may lead to very unpleasant stuff when porting from one platfrom to
> another.
What "unpleasant stuff" are you referring to, exactly? Abstracting the
heap type away from userspace has actually made our lives easier since
userspace doesn't need to know anything about the properties of the
underlying platform. It just asks for a buffer from the "camera" heap,
for example. On some platforms that's contiguous, on others it's not.
-Mitch
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>
To: Andrew <andrew@ncrmnt.org>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org>,
arve@android.com, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Riley Andrews <riandrews@android.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
a.bogdanova@module.ru, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
romlem@google.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>,
a.makarov@module.ru, Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: Devicetree bindings for Ion
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:34:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vnkw8u6xts6n.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c6ea0362f5336d9bc8acbfbd7ceae06@mail.ncrmnt.org> (andrew@ncrmnt.org's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:14:23 +0300")
On Tue, Oct 13 2015 at 11:14:23 AM, Andrew <andrew@ncrmnt.org> wrote:
> On 2015-10-12 21:39, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06 2015 at 05:35:41 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> + ion {
>>>> + compatbile = "linux,ion";
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + ion-system-heap {
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-id = <0>;
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_SYSTEM_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-name = "system";
>>>
>>> How does this vary across platforms? Is all of this being pushed down
>>> to DT, because there is no coordination of this at the kernel ABI
>>> level across platforms. In other words, why can't heap 0 be hardcoded
>>> as system heap in the driver. It seems to me any 1 of these 3
>>> properties could be used to derive the other 2.
>>
>> The heap-id<->heap-type mapping isn't necessarily 1:1. As Laura
>> indicated elsewhere on this thread, a given heap might need to be
>> contiguous on one platform but not on another. In that case you just
>> swap out the heap-type here and there's no need for userspace to change.
>>
>> The heap-name, OTOH, could be derived from the heap-id, which is what we
>> hackishly do here [1] and here[2].
>
> By the way, since we agreed that heap id and heap type mappings
> are not 1:1 - we have a problem with the current API.
>
> In userspace we currently have this:
>
> int ion_alloc(int fd, size_t len, size_t align, unsigned int heap_mask,
> unsigned int flags, ion_user_handle_t *handle);
>
> We do not specify here what TYPE of heap we want the allocation to come
> from.
> This may lead to very unpleasant stuff when porting from one platfrom to
> another.
What "unpleasant stuff" are you referring to, exactly? Abstracting the
heap type away from userspace has actually made our lives easier since
userspace doesn't need to know anything about the properties of the
underlying platform. It just asks for a buffer from the "camera" heap,
for example. On some platforms that's contiguous, on others it's not.
-Mitch
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>
To: Andrew <andrew@ncrmnt.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
arve@android.com, Riley Andrews <riandrews@android.com>,
Laura Abbott <laura@labbott.name>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
romlem@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
a.makarov@module.ru, a.bogdanova@module.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: Devicetree bindings for Ion
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:34:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vnkw8u6xts6n.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c6ea0362f5336d9bc8acbfbd7ceae06@mail.ncrmnt.org> (andrew@ncrmnt.org's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:14:23 +0300")
On Tue, Oct 13 2015 at 11:14:23 AM, Andrew <andrew@ncrmnt.org> wrote:
> On 2015-10-12 21:39, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06 2015 at 05:35:41 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> + ion {
>>>> + compatbile = "linux,ion";
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + ion-system-heap {
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-id = <0>;
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-type = <ION_SYSTEM_HEAP_TYPE>;
>>>> + linux,ion-heap-name = "system";
>>>
>>> How does this vary across platforms? Is all of this being pushed down
>>> to DT, because there is no coordination of this at the kernel ABI
>>> level across platforms. In other words, why can't heap 0 be hardcoded
>>> as system heap in the driver. It seems to me any 1 of these 3
>>> properties could be used to derive the other 2.
>>
>> The heap-id<->heap-type mapping isn't necessarily 1:1. As Laura
>> indicated elsewhere on this thread, a given heap might need to be
>> contiguous on one platform but not on another. In that case you just
>> swap out the heap-type here and there's no need for userspace to change.
>>
>> The heap-name, OTOH, could be derived from the heap-id, which is what we
>> hackishly do here [1] and here[2].
>
> By the way, since we agreed that heap id and heap type mappings
> are not 1:1 - we have a problem with the current API.
>
> In userspace we currently have this:
>
> int ion_alloc(int fd, size_t len, size_t align, unsigned int heap_mask,
> unsigned int flags, ion_user_handle_t *handle);
>
> We do not specify here what TYPE of heap we want the allocation to come
> from.
> This may lead to very unpleasant stuff when porting from one platfrom to
> another.
What "unpleasant stuff" are you referring to, exactly? Abstracting the
heap type away from userspace has actually made our lives easier since
userspace doesn't need to know anything about the properties of the
underlying platform. It just asks for a buffer from the "camera" heap,
for example. On some platforms that's contiguous, on others it's not.
-Mitch
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 20:47 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Devicetree bindings for Ion Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] WIP: " Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 22:35 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-06 22:35 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-06 22:35 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-06 23:01 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 23:01 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-07 10:36 ` Andrew
2015-10-07 10:36 ` Andrew
2015-10-07 10:36 ` Andrew
2015-10-07 18:36 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-07 18:36 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-07 18:36 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-07 19:23 ` Andrew
2015-10-07 19:23 ` Andrew
2015-10-07 19:23 ` Andrew
2015-10-08 1:43 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-08 1:43 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-08 1:43 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-12 18:39 ` Mitchel Humpherys
2015-10-12 18:39 ` Mitchel Humpherys
2015-10-12 18:39 ` Mitchel Humpherys
2015-10-13 8:14 ` Andrew
2015-10-13 8:14 ` Andrew
2015-10-13 8:14 ` Andrew
2015-10-20 16:34 ` Mitchel Humpherys [this message]
2015-10-20 16:34 ` Mitchel Humpherys
2015-10-20 16:34 ` Mitchel Humpherys
2015-10-22 10:36 ` andrew at ncrmnt.org
2015-10-22 10:36 ` andrew
2015-10-22 10:36 ` andrew
2015-10-22 17:23 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-22 17:23 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-22 17:23 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] staging: ion: Add files for parsing the devicetree (WIP) Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 20:47 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 21:29 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 21:29 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 21:29 ` [RFC PATCH] staging: ion: ion_parse_dt_heap_common() can be static kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 21:29 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 21:29 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 21:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] staging: ion: Add files for parsing the devicetree (WIP) Andrew
2015-10-06 21:30 ` Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vnkw8u6xts6n.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=mitchelh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.