* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
@ 2008-10-30 8:53 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 8:54 ` bugme-daemon
` (43 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-10-30 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #1 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-10-30 01:53 -------
Reply-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:17:37 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
> Summary: mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
> Product: IO/Storage
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc1/rc2
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Priority: P1
> Component: SCSI
> AssignedTo: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ReportedBy: alex.shi@intel.com
>
>
> Latest working kernel version:2.6.27
> Earliest failing kernel version:2.6.28-rc1
> Distribution:RHEL 4.91
> Hardware Environment:AIC79xx
> Software Environment:
> Problem Description:
>
> Steps to reproduce: mke2fs /dev/sdx
>
>
> [root@linux-b03 ~]# mke2fs /dev/sdb1
> mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> Filesystem label=
> OS type: Linux
> Block size=4096 (log=2)
> Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
> 3842720 inodes, 7679996 blocks
> 383999 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
> First data block=0
> Maximum filesystem blocks=4294967296
> 235 block groups
> 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
> 16352 inodes per group
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
> 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208,
> 4096000
>
> Writing inode tables: done
> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information:
>
> ..... hang ....
Can you please work out where it hung? Enable the softlockup detector,
nmi watchdog, try to get a sysrq-w or sysrq-t trace, etc?
Thanks.
> lspci :
>
>
> 04:02.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7902B U320 (rev 10)
> Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Unknown device 8080
> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, slow devsel, latency 64, IRQ 16
> I/O ports at 2400 [disabled] [size=256]
> Memory at c8200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
> I/O ports at 2000 [disabled] [size=256]
> [virtual] Expansion ROM at c2000000 [disabled] [size=512K]
> Capabilities: <access denied>
>
> 04:02.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7902B U320 (rev 10)
> Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Unknown device 8080
> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, slow devsel, latency 64, IRQ 17
> I/O ports at 2c00 [disabled] [size=256]
> Memory at c8202000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
> I/O ports at 2800 [disabled] [size=256]
> [virtual] Expansion ROM at c2080000 [disabled] [size=512K]
> Capabilities: <access denied>
>
> dmesg:
>
> 8D0, 0014 (r0 PTLTD )
> ACPI: RSDT BFF631DD, 003C (r1 PTLTD RSDT 6040000 LTP 0)
> ACPI: FACP BFF68E10, 0074 (r1 INTEL TUMWATER 6040000 PTL 3)
> ACPI: DSDT BFF64ACF, 4341 (r1 Intel BLAKFORD 6040000 MSFT 100000E)
> ACPI: FACS BFF69FC0, 0040
> ACPI: APIC BFF68E84, 00C8 (r1 PTLTD APIC 6040000 LTP 0)
> ACPI: MCFG BFF68F4C, 003C (r1 PTLTD MCFG 6040000 LTP 0)
> ACPI: BOOT BFF68F88, 0028 (r1 PTLTD $SBFTBL$ 6040000 LTP 1)
> ACPI: SPCR BFF68FB0, 0050 (r1 PTLTD $UCRTBL$ 6040000 PTL 1)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF63219, 13EC (r1 PmRef CpuPm 3000 INTL 20050228)
> ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
> (7 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 0140000000]
> #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000]
> #1 [0000006000 - 0000008000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000008000]
> #2 [0000200000 - 00006cabc8] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000200000 - 00006cabc8]
> #3 [0037eba000 - 0037fefe92] RAMDISK ==> [0037eba000 - 0037fefe92]
> #4 [000009c800 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009c800 - 0000100000]
> #5 [0000008000 - 000000b000] PGTABLE ==> [0000008000 - 000000b000]
> #6 [000000b000 - 000000c000] PGTABLE ==> [000000b000 - 000000c000]
> found SMP MP-table at [ffff8800000f5900] 000f5900
> [ffffe20000000000-ffffe200045fffff] PMD -> [ffff880028200000-ffff88002c7fffff]
> on node 0
> Zone PFN ranges:
> DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00001000
> DMA32 0x00001000 -> 0x00100000
> Normal 0x00100000 -> 0x00140000
> Movable zone start PFN for each node
> early_node_map[3] active PFN ranges
> 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009c
> 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x000bff60
> 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00140000
> On node 0 totalpages: 1048316
> DMA zone: 56 pages used for memmap
> DMA zone: 1334 pages reserved
> DMA zone: 2606 pages, LIFO batch:0
> DMA32 zone: 14280 pages used for memmap
> DMA32 zone: 767896 pages, LIFO batch:31
> Normal zone: 3584 pages used for memmap
> Normal zone: 258560 pages, LIFO batch:31
> Movable zone: 0 pages used for memmap
> ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x1008
> ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x04] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x05] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x02] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x05] lapic_id[0x06] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x06] lapic_id[0x03] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x07] lapic_id[0x07] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x03] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x04] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x05] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x06] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x07] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x08] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 8, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x09] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[24])
> IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 9, version 0, address 0xfec80000, GSI 24-47
> ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 high edge)
> ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
> ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
> ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
> Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
> SMP: Allowing 8 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> Allocating PCI resources starting at c2000000 (gap: c0000000:20000000)
> PERCPU: Allocating 45056 bytes of per cpu data
> NR_CPUS: 8, nr_cpu_ids: 8, nr_node_ids 1
> Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 1029062
> Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/1 profile=2 console=ttyS0,38400
> kernel profiling enabled (shift: 2)
> Initializing CPU#0
> PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> Fast TSC calibration using PIT
> Detected 2400.210 MHz processor.
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> console [ttyS0] enabled
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
> Checking aperture...
> No AGP bridge found
> Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area
> Calgary: Unable to locate Rio Grande table in EBDA - bailing!
> PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
> Placing software IO TLB between 0x20000000 - 0x24000000
> Memory: 4039052k/5242880k available (2745k kernel code, 153224k reserved, 1353k
> data, 328k init)
> Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency..
> 4800.42 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600840)
> Mount-cache hash table entries: 256
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> CPU0: Thermal monitoring handled by SMI
> using mwait in idle threads.
> ACPI: Core revision 20080926
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [DSDT](id 0001) - 421 Objects with 47 Devices 131 Methods 22 Regions
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 0002) - 43 Objects with 0 Devices 16 Methods 0 Regions
> tbxface-0596 [00] tb_load_namespace : ACPI Tables successfully acquired
> evxfevnt-0091 [00] enable : Transition to ACPI mode successful
> Setting APIC routing to flat
> ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> Booting processor 1 APIC 0x4 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#1
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600793)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]: passed.
> Booting processor 2 APIC 0x1 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#2
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600792)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
> CPU2: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#2]: passed.
> Booting processor 3 APIC 0x5 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#3
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600792)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
> CPU3: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#3]: passed.
> Booting processor 4 APIC 0x2 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#4
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.36 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600737)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 2
> CPU4: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#4]: passed.
> Booting processor 5 APIC 0x6 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#5
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600791)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 2
> CPU5: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#5]: passed.
> Booting processor 6 APIC 0x3 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#6
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.36 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600728)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 3
> CPU6: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#6]: passed.
> Booting processor 7 APIC 0x7 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#7
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4801.13 BogoMIPS (lpj=9602264)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 3
> CPU7: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#7]: passed.
> Brought up 8 CPUs
> Total of 8 processors activated (38403.86 BogoMIPS).
> net_namespace: 888 bytes
> NET: Registered protocol family 16
> ACPI: bus type pci registered
> PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 10
> PCI: MCFG area at e0000000 reserved in E820
> PCI: Using MMCONFIG at e0000000 - e0afffff
> PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
> evgpeblk-0957 [00] ev_create_gpe_block : GPE 00 to 1F [_GPE] 4 regs on int
> 0x9
> ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
> Completing Region/Field/Buffer/Package
> initialization:.........................................................................
> Initialized 17/22 Regions 0/0 Fields 35/35 Buffers 21/21 Packages (473 nodes)
> Initializing Device/Processor/Thermal objects by executing _INI methods:.
> Executed 1 _INI methods requiring 0 _STA executions (examined 57 objects)
> evgpeblk-1054 [00] ev_initialize_gpe_bloc: Found 9 Wake, Enabled 0 Runtime GPEs
> in this block
> ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
> ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:08.0: reg 10 64bit mmio: [0xfe700000-0xfe7003ff]
> pci 0000:00:08.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:08.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:1d.0: reg 20 io port: [0x1800-0x181f]
> pci 0000:00:1d.1: reg 20 io port: [0x1820-0x183f]
> pci 0000:00:1d.2: reg 20 io port: [0x1840-0x185f]
> pci 0000:00:1d.7: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xc8000000-0xc80003ff]
> pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:1f.0: Force enabled HPET at 0xfed00000
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 10 io port: [0x00-0x07]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 14 io port: [0x00-0x03]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 18 io port: [0x00-0x07]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 1c io port: [0x00-0x03]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 20 io port: [0x1860-0x186f]
> pci 0000:00:1f.3: reg 20 io port: [0x1100-0x111f]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8100000-0xc83fffff]
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc83fffff]
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PXH quirk detected; SHPC device MSI disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PXH quirk detected; SHPC device MSI disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:02:00.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> pci 0000:02:00.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 10 io port: [0x2400-0x24ff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 14 64bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc8201fff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 1c io port: [0x2000-0x20ff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x07ffff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 10 io port: [0x2c00-0x2cff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 14 64bit mmio: [0xc8202000-0xc8203fff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 1c io port: [0x2800-0x28ff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x07ffff]
> pci 0000:03:00.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> pci 0000:03:00.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xc8320000-0xc833ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xc8300000-0xc831ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 18 io port: [0x3000-0x301f]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x00ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:06:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xc8360000-0xc837ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xc8340000-0xc835ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 18 io port: [0x3020-0x303f]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x00ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:06:00.1: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge io port: [0x3000-0x3fff]
> pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8300000-0xc83fffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 14 io port: [0x4000-0x40ff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 18 32bit mmio: [0xc8400000-0xc840ffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x01ffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: supports D1 D2
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge io port: [0x4000-0x4fff]
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8400000-0xc84fffff]
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge 64bit mmio pref: [0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff]
> bus 00 -> node 0
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0.BPD0.PXH0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0.BPD0.PXH1._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0.BPD2._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMF3._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P4._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P6._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PEX0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *9
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 *5 6 7 10 11 14 15)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 14 15)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *10 11 14 15)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> SCSI subsystem initialized
> PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
> PCI-GART: No AMD northbridge found.
> hpet clockevent registered
> HPET: 3 timers in total, 0 timers will be used for per-cpu timer
> hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0
> hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter
> pnp: PnP ACPI init
> ACPI: bus type pnp registered
> pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices
> ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x295-0x296 has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0xca2-0xca3 has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0xca8-0xcaf has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x1000-0x107f has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x1180-0x11bf has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0xfe00-0xfe00 has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xe0000000-0xefffffff could not be reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee0ffff could not be reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfec80000-0xfec80fff has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfed1c000-0xfed1ffff has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfe000000-0xfe01ffff has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfe600000-0xfe6fffff has been reserved
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:04
> pci 0000:03:00.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x2fff
> pci 0000:03:00.0: MEM window: 0xc8200000-0xc82fffff
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c20fffff
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:05
> pci 0000:03:00.2: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:03
> pci 0000:02:00.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x2fff
> pci 0000:02:00.0: MEM window: 0xc8200000-0xc82fffff
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c20fffff
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:06
> pci 0000:02:02.0: IO window: 0x3000-0x3fff
> pci 0000:02:02.0: MEM window: 0xc8300000-0xc83fffff
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2100000-0x000000c21fffff
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:02
> pci 0000:01:00.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x3fff
> pci 0000:01:00.0: MEM window: 0xc8200000-0xc83fffff
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c21fffff
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:07
> pci 0000:01:00.3: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.3: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:01
> pci 0000:00:02.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x3fff
> pci 0000:00:02.0: MEM window: 0xc8100000-0xc83fffff
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c21fffff
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:08
> pci 0000:00:04.0: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:04.0: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:09
> pci 0000:00:06.0: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:0a
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:0b
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: IO window: 0x4000-0x4fff
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xc8400000-0xc84fffff
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000d0000000-0x000000d7ffffff
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:03:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:03:00.2: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> pci 0000:02:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:01:00.3: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:00:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:00:06.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64
> bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0x00-0xffff]
> bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [0x000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
> bus: 01 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> bus: 01 index 1 mmio: [0xc8100000-0xc83fffff]
> bus: 01 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc21fffff]
> bus: 01 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 02 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> bus: 02 index 1 mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc83fffff]
> bus: 02 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc21fffff]
> bus: 02 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 03 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> bus: 03 index 1 mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> bus: 03 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc20fffff]
> bus: 03 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 04 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> bus: 04 index 1 mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> bus: 04 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc20fffff]
> bus: 04 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 06 index 0 io port: [0x3000-0x3fff]
> bus: 06 index 1 mmio: [0xc8300000-0xc83fffff]
> bus: 06 index 2 mmio: [0xc2100000-0xc21fffff]
> bus: 06 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0b index 0 io port: [0x4000-0x4fff]
> bus: 0b index 1 mmio: [0xc8400000-0xc84fffff]
> bus: 0b index 2 mmio: [0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff]
> bus: 0b index 3 io port: [0x00-0xffff]
> bus: 0b index 4 mmio: [0x000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
> NET: Registered protocol family 2
> IP route cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
> TCP established hash table entries: 262144 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
> TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
> TCP: Hash tables configured (established 262144 bind 65536)
> TCP reno registered
> NET: Registered protocol family 1
> checking if image is initramfs... it is
> Freeing initrd memory: 1239k freed
> Simple Boot Flag at 0x38 set to 0x1
> HugeTLB registered 2 MB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
> Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir@monad.swb.de).
> msgmni has been set to 7893
> io scheduler noop registered
> io scheduler anticipatory registered (default)
> io scheduler deadline registered
> io scheduler cfq registered
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: Boot video device
> input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input0
> ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF]
> input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input1
> ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64605, 0200 (r1 PmRef Cpu0Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00C6) - 5 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:00: registered as cooling_device0
> ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64805, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu1Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00C9) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:01: registered as cooling_device1
> ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF6486B, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu2Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00CC) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:02: registered as cooling_device2
> ACPI: Processor [CPU2] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF648D1, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu3Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00CF) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:03: registered as cooling_device3
> ACPI: Processor [CPU3] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64937, 0066 (r1 PmRef CPU4Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00D2) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:04: registered as cooling_device4
> ACPI: Processor [CPU4] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF6499D, 0066 (r1 PmRef CPU5Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00D5) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:05: registered as cooling_device5
> ACPI: Processor [CPU5] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64A03, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu6Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00D8) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:06: registered as cooling_device6
> ACPI: Processor [CPU6] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64A69, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu7Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00DB) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:07: registered as cooling_device7
> ACPI: Processor [CPU7] (supports 8 throttling states)
> Real Time Clock Driver v1.12ac
> intel_rng: FWH not detected
> Linux agpgart interface v0.103
> Hangcheck: starting hangcheck timer 0.9.0 (tick is 180 seconds, margin is 60
> seconds).
> Hangcheck: Using get_cycles().
> Serial: 8250/16550 driver4 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
> serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> 00:09: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> 00:0a: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> brd: module loaded
> loop: module loaded
> Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.20-k3-NAPI
> Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
> console [netcon0] enabled
> netconsole: network logging started
> Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver
> piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE controller (0x8086:0x269e rev 0x09)
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE port disabled
> piix 0000:00:1f.1: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1860-0x1867
> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> hdb: LITE-ON COMBO SOHC-5236V, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> hdb: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4
> hdb: UDMA/44 mode selected
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide_generic: please use "probe_mask=0x3f" module parameter for probing all
> legacy ISA IDE ports
> ide-gd driver 1.18
> ide-cd driver 5.00
> ide-cd: hdb: ATAPI 52X DVD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 1536kB Cache
> Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> aic79xx 0000:04:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> scsi0 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 3.0
> <Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter>
> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100MHz, 512 SCBs
> scsi 0:0:6:0: Direct-Access HITACHI HUS103073FL3800 SA1B PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
> target0:0:6: asynchronous
> scsi0:A:6:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
> target0:0:6: Beginning Domain Validation
> target0:0:6: wide asynchronous
> target0:0:6: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s DT IU QAS RDSTRM RTI WRFLOW PCOMP
> (6.25 ns, offset 80)
> target0:0:6: Ending Domain Validation
> scsi 0:0:8:0: Processor SUPER GEM359 REV001 1.09 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2
> target0:0:8: asynchronous
> target0:0:8: Beginning Domain Validation
> target0:0:8: Ending Domain Validation
> scsi 0:0:9:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST336607LC 0007 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
> target0:0:9: asynchronous
> scsi0:A:9:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
> target0:0:9: Beginning Domain Validation
> target0:0:9: wide asynchronous
> target0:0:9: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s DT IU QAS RDSTRM RTI WRFLOW PCOMP
> (6.25 ns, offset 63)
> target0:0:9: Ending Domain Validation
> aic79xx 0000:04:02.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> scsi1 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 3.0
> <Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter>
> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100MHz, 512 SCBs
> Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] 143374805 512-byte hardware sectors: (73.4 GB/68.3 GiB)
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Mode Sense: c3 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] 143374805 512-byte hardware sectors: (73.4 GB/68.3 GiB)
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Mode Sense: c3 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sda: sda1 sda2
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] 71687372 512-byte hardware sectors: (36.7 GB/34.1 GiB)
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: ab 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] 71687372 512-byte hardware sectors: (36.7 GB/34.1 GiB)
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: ab 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sdb: sdb1 sdb2
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
> PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:KBC0,PNP0f13:MSE0] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
> serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
> serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
> mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
> dcdbas dcdbas: Dell Systems Management Base Driver (version 5.6.0-3.2)
> oprofile: using NMI interrupt.
> TCP cubic registered
> input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input2
> NET: Registered protocol family 10
> IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
> NET: Registered protocol family 17
> RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 328k freed
> end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
> end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
> EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem.
> EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during recovery.
> input: PS/2 Generic Mouse as /class/input/input3
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.3.3.3-k6
> e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Intel Corporation.
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: irq 95 for MSI/MSI-X
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x4) 00:30:48:30:61:16
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: MAC: 4, PHY: 5, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: setting latency timer to 64
> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: irq 94 for MSI/MSI-X
> 0000:06:00.1: eth1: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x4) 00:30:48:30:61:17
> 0000:06:00.1: eth1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> 0000:06:00.1: eth1: MAC: 4, PHY: 5, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
> EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
> Adding 4096564k swap on /dev/sda2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4096564k
> Adding 5123064k swap on /dev/sdb2. Priority:-2 extents:1 across:5123064k
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
> <peter.oruba@amd.com>
> Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed.
> warning: process `kudzu' used the deprecated sysctl system call with 1.23.
> process `sysctl' is using deprecated sysctl (syscall)
> net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time; Use net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time_ms
> instead.
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: irq 95 for MSI/MSI-X
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: irq 95 for MSI/MSI-X
> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None
> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> warning: `dbus-daemon' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use)
> eth0: no IPv6 routers present
>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 8:53 ` [Bug 11898] " bugme-daemon
@ 2008-10-30 8:54 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 10:23 ` bugme-daemon
` (42 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-10-30 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
akpm@osdl.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 8:53 ` [Bug 11898] " bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 8:54 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-10-30 10:23 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 12:37 ` bugme-daemon
` (41 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-10-30 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 36669 bytes --]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #2 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-10-30 03:23 -------
New panic output is attached after adding softlockup. New found:
1, "strace mke2fs /dev/sdb1" works well. it just show many write(3,
"\377\377...", 4096) =4096 ....
2, when system hang, ping this machine is workable. And keyboard input works
but cmd has no output.
BRG
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@linux-foundation.org]
Sent: 2008Äê10ÔÂ30ÈÕ 16:54
To: Shi, Alex
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11898] New: mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:17:37 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
> Summary: mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
> Product: IO/Storage
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc1/rc2
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Priority: P1
> Component: SCSI
> AssignedTo: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> ReportedBy: alex.shi@intel.com
>
>
> Latest working kernel version:2.6.27
> Earliest failing kernel version:2.6.28-rc1
> Distribution:RHEL 4.91
> Hardware Environment:AIC79xx
> Software Environment:
> Problem Description:
>
> Steps to reproduce: mke2fs /dev/sdx
>
>
> [root@linux-b03 ~]# mke2fs /dev/sdb1
> mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> Filesystem label=
> OS type: Linux
> Block size=4096 (log=2)
> Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
> 3842720 inodes, 7679996 blocks
> 383999 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
> First data block=0
> Maximum filesystem blocks=4294967296
> 235 block groups
> 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
> 16352 inodes per group
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
> 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208,
> 4096000
>
> Writing inode tables: done
> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information:
>
> ..... hang ....
Can you please work out where it hung? Enable the softlockup detector,
nmi watchdog, try to get a sysrq-w or sysrq-t trace, etc?
Thanks.
> lspci :
>
>
> 04:02.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7902B U320 (rev 10)
> Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Unknown device 8080
> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, slow devsel, latency 64, IRQ 16
> I/O ports at 2400 [disabled] [size=256]
> Memory at c8200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
> I/O ports at 2000 [disabled] [size=256]
> [virtual] Expansion ROM at c2000000 [disabled] [size=512K]
> Capabilities: <access denied>
>
> 04:02.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7902B U320 (rev 10)
> Subsystem: Super Micro Computer Inc Unknown device 8080
> Flags: bus master, 66MHz, slow devsel, latency 64, IRQ 17
> I/O ports at 2c00 [disabled] [size=256]
> Memory at c8202000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
> I/O ports at 2800 [disabled] [size=256]
> [virtual] Expansion ROM at c2080000 [disabled] [size=512K]
> Capabilities: <access denied>
>
> dmesg:
>
> 8D0, 0014 (r0 PTLTD )
> ACPI: RSDT BFF631DD, 003C (r1 PTLTD RSDT 6040000 LTP 0)
> ACPI: FACP BFF68E10, 0074 (r1 INTEL TUMWATER 6040000 PTL 3)
> ACPI: DSDT BFF64ACF, 4341 (r1 Intel BLAKFORD 6040000 MSFT 100000E)
> ACPI: FACS BFF69FC0, 0040
> ACPI: APIC BFF68E84, 00C8 (r1 PTLTD APIC 6040000 LTP 0)
> ACPI: MCFG BFF68F4C, 003C (r1 PTLTD MCFG 6040000 LTP 0)
> ACPI: BOOT BFF68F88, 0028 (r1 PTLTD $SBFTBL$ 6040000 LTP 1)
> ACPI: SPCR BFF68FB0, 0050 (r1 PTLTD $UCRTBL$ 6040000 PTL 1)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF63219, 13EC (r1 PmRef CpuPm 3000 INTL 20050228)
> ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
> (7 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 0140000000]
> #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000]
> #1 [0000006000 - 0000008000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000008000]
> #2 [0000200000 - 00006cabc8] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000200000 - 00006cabc8]
> #3 [0037eba000 - 0037fefe92] RAMDISK ==> [0037eba000 - 0037fefe92]
> #4 [000009c800 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009c800 - 0000100000]
> #5 [0000008000 - 000000b000] PGTABLE ==> [0000008000 - 000000b000]
> #6 [000000b000 - 000000c000] PGTABLE ==> [000000b000 - 000000c000]
> found SMP MP-table at [ffff8800000f5900] 000f5900
> [ffffe20000000000-ffffe200045fffff] PMD -> [ffff880028200000-ffff88002c7fffff]
> on node 0
> Zone PFN ranges:
> DMA 0x00000000 -> 0x00001000
> DMA32 0x00001000 -> 0x00100000
> Normal 0x00100000 -> 0x00140000
> Movable zone start PFN for each node
> early_node_map[3] active PFN ranges
> 0: 0x00000000 -> 0x0000009c
> 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x000bff60
> 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00140000
> On node 0 totalpages: 1048316
> DMA zone: 56 pages used for memmap
> DMA zone: 1334 pages reserved
> DMA zone: 2606 pages, LIFO batch:0
> DMA32 zone: 14280 pages used for memmap
> DMA32 zone: 767896 pages, LIFO batch:31
> Normal zone: 3584 pages used for memmap
> Normal zone: 258560 pages, LIFO batch:31
> Movable zone: 0 pages used for memmap
> ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x1008
> ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x04] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x05] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x02] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x05] lapic_id[0x06] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x06] lapic_id[0x03] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x07] lapic_id[0x07] enabled)
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x03] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x04] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x05] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x06] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x07] high edge lint[0x1])
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x08] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 8, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x09] address[0xfec80000] gsi_base[24])
> IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 9, version 0, address 0xfec80000, GSI 24-47
> ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 high edge)
> ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
> ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
> ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
> Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
> SMP: Allowing 8 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> Allocating PCI resources starting at c2000000 (gap: c0000000:20000000)
> PERCPU: Allocating 45056 bytes of per cpu data
> NR_CPUS: 8, nr_cpu_ids: 8, nr_node_ids 1
> Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 1029062
> Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/1 profile=2 console=ttyS0,38400
> kernel profiling enabled (shift: 2)
> Initializing CPU#0
> PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> Fast TSC calibration using PIT
> Detected 2400.210 MHz processor.
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> console [ttyS0] enabled
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
> Checking aperture...
> No AGP bridge found
> Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area
> Calgary: Unable to locate Rio Grande table in EBDA - bailing!
> PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
> Placing software IO TLB between 0x20000000 - 0x24000000
> Memory: 4039052k/5242880k available (2745k kernel code, 153224k reserved, 1353k
> data, 328k init)
> Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency..
> 4800.42 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600840)
> Mount-cache hash table entries: 256
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> CPU0: Thermal monitoring handled by SMI
> using mwait in idle threads.
> ACPI: Core revision 20080926
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [DSDT](id 0001) - 421 Objects with 47 Devices 131 Methods 22 Regions
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 0002) - 43 Objects with 0 Devices 16 Methods 0 Regions
> tbxface-0596 [00] tb_load_namespace : ACPI Tables successfully acquired
> evxfevnt-0091 [00] enable : Transition to ACPI mode successful
> Setting APIC routing to flat
> ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> Booting processor 1 APIC 0x4 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#1
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600793)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]: passed.
> Booting processor 2 APIC 0x1 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#2
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600792)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
> CPU2: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#2]: passed.
> Booting processor 3 APIC 0x5 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#3
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600792)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
> CPU3: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#3]: passed.
> Booting processor 4 APIC 0x2 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#4
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.36 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600737)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 2
> CPU4: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#4]: passed.
> Booting processor 5 APIC 0x6 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#5
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.39 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600791)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 2
> CPU5: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#5]: passed.
> Booting processor 6 APIC 0x3 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#6
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4800.36 BogoMIPS (lpj=9600728)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 3
> CPU6: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#6]: passed.
> Booting processor 7 APIC 0x7 ip 0x6000
> Initializing CPU#7
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4801.13 BogoMIPS (lpj=9602264)
> CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K
> CPU: L2 cache: 4096K
> CPU: Physical Processor ID: 1
> CPU: Processor Core ID: 3
> CPU7: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
> CPU7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5340 @ 2.40GHz stepping 07
> checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#7]: passed.
> Brought up 8 CPUs
> Total of 8 processors activated (38403.86 BogoMIPS).
> net_namespace: 888 bytes
> NET: Registered protocol family 16
> ACPI: bus type pci registered
> PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 10
> PCI: MCFG area at e0000000 reserved in E820
> PCI: Using MMCONFIG at e0000000 - e0afffff
> PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
> evgpeblk-0957 [00] ev_create_gpe_block : GPE 00 to 1F [_GPE] 4 regs on int
> 0x9
> ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
> Completing Region/Field/Buffer/Package
> initialization:.........................................................................
> Initialized 17/22 Regions 0/0 Fields 35/35 Buffers 21/21 Packages (473 nodes)
> Initializing Device/Processor/Thermal objects by executing _INI methods:.
> Executed 1 _INI methods requiring 0 _STA executions (examined 57 objects)
> evgpeblk-1054 [00] ev_initialize_gpe_bloc: Found 9 Wake, Enabled 0 Runtime GPEs
> in this block
> ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
> ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:08.0: reg 10 64bit mmio: [0xfe700000-0xfe7003ff]
> pci 0000:00:08.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:08.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:1d.0: reg 20 io port: [0x1800-0x181f]
> pci 0000:00:1d.1: reg 20 io port: [0x1820-0x183f]
> pci 0000:00:1d.2: reg 20 io port: [0x1840-0x185f]
> pci 0000:00:1d.7: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xc8000000-0xc80003ff]
> pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:1d.7: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:1f.0: Force enabled HPET at 0xfed00000
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 10 io port: [0x00-0x07]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 14 io port: [0x00-0x03]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 18 io port: [0x00-0x07]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 1c io port: [0x00-0x03]
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 20 io port: [0x1860-0x186f]
> pci 0000:00:1f.3: reg 20 io port: [0x1100-0x111f]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8100000-0xc83fffff]
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc83fffff]
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PXH quirk detected; SHPC device MSI disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PXH quirk detected; SHPC device MSI disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:02:00.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> pci 0000:02:00.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 10 io port: [0x2400-0x24ff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 14 64bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc8201fff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 1c io port: [0x2000-0x20ff]
> pci 0000:04:02.0: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x07ffff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 10 io port: [0x2c00-0x2cff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 14 64bit mmio: [0xc8202000-0xc8203fff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 1c io port: [0x2800-0x28ff]
> pci 0000:04:02.1: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x07ffff]
> pci 0000:03:00.0: bridge io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> pci 0000:03:00.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xc8320000-0xc833ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xc8300000-0xc831ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 18 io port: [0x3000-0x301f]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x00ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:06:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xc8360000-0xc837ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 14 32bit mmio: [0xc8340000-0xc835ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 18 io port: [0x3020-0x303f]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x00ffff]
> pci 0000:06:00.1: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:06:00.1: PME# disabled
> pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge io port: [0x3000-0x3fff]
> pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8300000-0xc83fffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 10 32bit mmio: [0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 14 io port: [0x4000-0x40ff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 18 32bit mmio: [0xc8400000-0xc840ffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: reg 30 32bit mmio: [0x000000-0x01ffff]
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: supports D1 D2
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: transparent bridge
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge io port: [0x4000-0x4fff]
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xc8400000-0xc84fffff]
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: bridge 64bit mmio pref: [0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff]
> bus 00 -> node 0
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0.BPD0.PXH0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0.BPD0.PXH1._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMD0.BPD2._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.BMF3._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P4._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.P0P6._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PEX0._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIB._PRT]
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *9
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 *5 6 7 10 11 14 15)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 14 15)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 *10 11 14 15)
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] (IRQs 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKG] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKH] (IRQs 4 5 6 7 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled.
> SCSI subsystem initialized
> PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
> PCI-GART: No AMD northbridge found.
> hpet clockevent registered
> HPET: 3 timers in total, 0 timers will be used for per-cpu timer
> hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0
> hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter
> pnp: PnP ACPI init
> ACPI: bus type pnp registered
> pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices
> ACPI: ACPI bus type pnp unregistered
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x4d0-0x4d1 has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x295-0x296 has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0xca2-0xca3 has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0xca8-0xcaf has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x1000-0x107f has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x1180-0x11bf has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x800-0x80f has been reserved
> system 00:01: ioport range 0xfe00-0xfe00 has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xe0000000-0xefffffff could not be reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfee00000-0xfee0ffff could not be reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfec80000-0xfec80fff has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfed1c000-0xfed1ffff has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfe000000-0xfe01ffff has been reserved
> system 00:01: iomem range 0xfe600000-0xfe6fffff has been reserved
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:04
> pci 0000:03:00.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x2fff
> pci 0000:03:00.0: MEM window: 0xc8200000-0xc82fffff
> pci 0000:03:00.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c20fffff
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:05
> pci 0000:03:00.2: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:03:00.2: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:03
> pci 0000:02:00.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x2fff
> pci 0000:02:00.0: MEM window: 0xc8200000-0xc82fffff
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c20fffff
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:06
> pci 0000:02:02.0: IO window: 0x3000-0x3fff
> pci 0000:02:02.0: MEM window: 0xc8300000-0xc83fffff
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2100000-0x000000c21fffff
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:02
> pci 0000:01:00.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x3fff
> pci 0000:01:00.0: MEM window: 0xc8200000-0xc83fffff
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c21fffff
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:07
> pci 0000:01:00.3: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.3: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:01:00.3: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:01
> pci 0000:00:02.0: IO window: 0x2000-0x3fff
> pci 0000:00:02.0: MEM window: 0xc8100000-0xc83fffff
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000c2000000-0x000000c21fffff
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:08
> pci 0000:00:04.0: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:04.0: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:09
> pci 0000:00:06.0: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:0a
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: IO window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: MEM window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PREFETCH window: disabled
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:0b
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: IO window: 0x4000-0x4fff
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: MEM window: 0xc8400000-0xc84fffff
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: PREFETCH window: 0x000000d0000000-0x000000d7ffffff
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:03:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:03:00.2: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:02:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> pci 0000:02:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:01:00.3: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:04.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:00:04.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:06.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> pci 0000:00:06.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> pci 0000:00:1c.0: setting latency timer to 64
> pci 0000:00:1e.0: setting latency timer to 64
> bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0x00-0xffff]
> bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [0x000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
> bus: 01 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> bus: 01 index 1 mmio: [0xc8100000-0xc83fffff]
> bus: 01 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc21fffff]
> bus: 01 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 02 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x3fff]
> bus: 02 index 1 mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc83fffff]
> bus: 02 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc21fffff]
> bus: 02 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 03 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> bus: 03 index 1 mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> bus: 03 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc20fffff]
> bus: 03 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 04 index 0 io port: [0x2000-0x2fff]
> bus: 04 index 1 mmio: [0xc8200000-0xc82fffff]
> bus: 04 index 2 mmio: [0xc2000000-0xc20fffff]
> bus: 04 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 05 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 06 index 0 io port: [0x3000-0x3fff]
> bus: 06 index 1 mmio: [0xc8300000-0xc83fffff]
> bus: 06 index 2 mmio: [0xc2100000-0xc21fffff]
> bus: 06 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 07 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 08 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 09 index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 0 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 1 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 2 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0a index 3 mmio: [0x0-0x0]
> bus: 0b index 0 io port: [0x4000-0x4fff]
> bus: 0b index 1 mmio: [0xc8400000-0xc84fffff]
> bus: 0b index 2 mmio: [0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff]
> bus: 0b index 3 io port: [0x00-0xffff]
> bus: 0b index 4 mmio: [0x000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
> NET: Registered protocol family 2
> IP route cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
> TCP established hash table entries: 262144 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
> TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
> TCP: Hash tables configured (established 262144 bind 65536)
> TCP reno registered
> NET: Registered protocol family 1
> checking if image is initramfs... it is
> Freeing initrd memory: 1239k freed
> Simple Boot Flag at 0x38 set to 0x1
> HugeTLB registered 2 MB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
> Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir@monad.swb.de).
> msgmni has been set to 7893
> io scheduler noop registered
> io scheduler anticipatory registered (default)
> io scheduler deadline registered
> io scheduler cfq registered
> pci 0000:0b:01.0: Boot video device
> input: Power Button (FF) as /class/input/input0
> ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF]
> input: Power Button (CM) as /class/input/input1
> ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64605, 0200 (r1 PmRef Cpu0Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00C6) - 5 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:00: registered as cooling_device0
> ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64805, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu1Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00C9) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:01: registered as cooling_device1
> ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF6486B, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu2Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00CC) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:02: registered as cooling_device2
> ACPI: Processor [CPU2] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF648D1, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu3Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00CF) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:03: registered as cooling_device3
> ACPI: Processor [CPU3] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64937, 0066 (r1 PmRef CPU4Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00D2) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:04: registered as cooling_device4
> ACPI: Processor [CPU4] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF6499D, 0066 (r1 PmRef CPU5Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00D5) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:05: registered as cooling_device5
> ACPI: Processor [CPU5] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64A03, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu6Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00D8) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:06: registered as cooling_device6
> ACPI: Processor [CPU6] (supports 8 throttling states)
> ACPI: SSDT BFF64A69, 0066 (r1 PmRef Cpu7Ist 3000 INTL 20050228)
> Parsing all Control Methods:
> Table [SSDT](id 00DB) - 3 Objects with 0 Devices 2 Methods 0 Regions
> processor ACPI0007:07: registered as cooling_device7
> ACPI: Processor [CPU7] (supports 8 throttling states)
> Real Time Clock Driver v1.12ac
> intel_rng: FWH not detected
> Linux agpgart interface v0.103
> Hangcheck: starting hangcheck timer 0.9.0 (tick is 180 seconds, margin is 60
> seconds).
> Hangcheck: Using get_cycles().
> Serial: 8250/16550 driver4 ports, IRQ sharing disabled
> serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> 00:09: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> 00:0a: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> brd: module loaded
> loop: module loaded
> Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.20-k3-NAPI
> Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
> console [netcon0] enabled
> netconsole: network logging started
> Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver
> piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE controller (0x8086:0x269e rev 0x09)
> pci 0000:00:1f.1: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> piix 0000:00:1f.1: IDE port disabled
> piix 0000:00:1f.1: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1860-0x1867
> Probing IDE interface ide0...
> hdb: LITE-ON COMBO SOHC-5236V, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
> hdb: host max PIO4 wanted PIO255(auto-tune) selected PIO4
> hdb: UDMA/44 mode selected
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide_generic: please use "probe_mask=0x3f" module parameter for probing all
> legacy ISA IDE ports
> ide-gd driver 1.18
> ide-cd driver 5.00
> ide-cd: hdb: ATAPI 52X DVD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 1536kB Cache
> Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
> aic79xx 0000:04:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> scsi0 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 3.0
> <Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter>
> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100MHz, 512 SCBs
> scsi 0:0:6:0: Direct-Access HITACHI HUS103073FL3800 SA1B PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
> target0:0:6: asynchronous
> scsi0:A:6:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
> target0:0:6: Beginning Domain Validation
> target0:0:6: wide asynchronous
> target0:0:6: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s DT IU QAS RDSTRM RTI WRFLOW PCOMP
> (6.25 ns, offset 80)
> target0:0:6: Ending Domain Validation
> scsi 0:0:8:0: Processor SUPER GEM359 REV001 1.09 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2
> target0:0:8: asynchronous
> target0:0:8: Beginning Domain Validation
> target0:0:8: Ending Domain Validation
> scsi 0:0:9:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST336607LC 0007 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
> target0:0:9: asynchronous
> scsi0:A:9:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
> target0:0:9: Beginning Domain Validation
> target0:0:9: wide asynchronous
> target0:0:9: FAST-160 WIDE SCSI 320.0 MB/s DT IU QAS RDSTRM RTI WRFLOW PCOMP
> (6.25 ns, offset 63)
> target0:0:9: Ending Domain Validation
> aic79xx 0000:04:02.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> scsi1 : Adaptec AIC79XX PCI-X SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 3.0
> <Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter>
> aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100MHz, 512 SCBs
> Driver 'sd' needs updating - please use bus_type methods
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] 143374805 512-byte hardware sectors: (73.4 GB/68.3 GiB)
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Mode Sense: c3 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] 143374805 512-byte hardware sectors: (73.4 GB/68.3 GiB)
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Mode Sense: c3 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sda: sda1 sda2
> sd 0:0:6:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] 71687372 512-byte hardware sectors: (36.7 GB/34.1 GiB)
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: ab 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] 71687372 512-byte hardware sectors: (36.7 GB/34.1 GiB)
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: ab 00 10 08
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and
> FUA
> sdb: sdb1 sdb2
> sd 0:0:9:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
> PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:KBC0,PNP0f13:MSE0] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
> serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
> serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
> mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
> dcdbas dcdbas: Dell Systems Management Base Driver (version 5.6.0-3.2)
> oprofile: using NMI interrupt.
> TCP cubic registered
> input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input2
> NET: Registered protocol family 10
> IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
> NET: Registered protocol family 17
> RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 328k freed
> end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
> end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
> EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem.
> EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during recovery.
> input: PS/2 Generic Mouse as /class/input/input3
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.3.3.3-k6
> e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Intel Corporation.
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: irq 95 for MSI/MSI-X
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x4) 00:30:48:30:61:16
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: MAC: 4, PHY: 5, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: setting latency timer to 64
> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: irq 94 for MSI/MSI-X
> 0000:06:00.1: eth1: (PCI Express:2.5GB/s:Width x4) 00:30:48:30:61:17
> 0000:06:00.1: eth1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> 0000:06:00.1: eth1: MAC: 4, PHY: 5, PBA No: ffffff-0ff
> EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
> Adding 4096564k swap on /dev/sda2. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4096564k
> Adding 5123064k swap on /dev/sdb2. Priority:-2 extents:1 across:5123064k
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-07
> Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
> <peter.oruba@amd.com>
> Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed.
> warning: process `kudzu' used the deprecated sysctl system call with 1.23.
> process `sysctl' is using deprecated sysctl (syscall)
> net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time; Use net.ipv6.neigh.default.retrans_time_ms
> instead.
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: irq 95 for MSI/MSI-X
> e1000e 0000:06:00.0: irq 95 for MSI/MSI-X
> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> 0000:06:00.0: eth0: Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None
> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> warning: `dbus-daemon' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use)
> eth0: no IPv6 routers present
>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-30 10:23 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-10-30 12:37 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 14:06 ` bugme-daemon
` (40 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-10-30 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
rjw@sisk.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |11808
nThis| |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-30 12:37 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-10-30 14:06 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-31 3:12 ` bugme-daemon
` (39 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-10-30 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #3 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-10-30 07:06 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:22 +0800, Shi, Alex wrote:
> New panic output is attached after adding softlockup. New found:
> 1, "strace mke2fs /dev/sdb1" works well. it just show many write(3, "\377\377...", 4096) =4096 ....
> 2, when system hang, ping this machine is workable. And keyboard input works but cmd has no output.
This doesn't entirely implicate the aic79xx. The trace shows:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff803f99eb>] ? scsi_request_fn+0x31a/0x416
[<ffffffff803435ad>] ? blk_invoke_request_fn+0x79/0x11d
[<ffffffff80343b21>] ? __blk_run_queue+0x2a/0x2e
[<ffffffff803f7def>] ? scsi_run_queue+0x2cd/0x2e4
[<ffffffff803f8452>] ? scsi_next_command+0x3b/0x4c
[<ffffffff803f86ef>] ? scsi_end_request+0x97/0xa9
[<ffffffff803f93b0>] ? scsi_io_completion+0x190/0x3a8
[<ffffffff803f3a9f>] ? scsi_finish_command+0xb6/0xbf
[<ffffffff803f96c9>] ? scsi_softirq_done+0x101/0x109
[<ffffffff803476df>] ? blk_done_softirq+0x68/0x79
[<ffffffff8023de8c>] ? __do_softirq+0x86/0x14f
[<ffffffff8020c63c>] ? call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020dd82>] ? do_softirq+0x39/0x77
[<ffffffff8023de04>] ? irq_exit+0x44/0x46
[<ffffffff8020de88>] ? do_IRQ+0xc8/0xe8
[<ffffffff8020b8f6>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI> [<ffffffff8021299b>] ? mwait_idle+0x4a/0x4f
[<ffffffff80209c82>] ? enter_idle+0x27/0x29
[<ffffffff8020a198>] ? cpu_idle+0x45/0x63
[<ffffffff804e4d50>] ? start_secondary+0x179/0x17d
So we locked up somehow in the mid-layer trying to feed a new command
from the softirq. It would greatly help to know what line in scsi_lib.c
scsi_request_fn+0x31a/0x416
The trace implies SCSI is built in, so
addr2line -e vmlinux -f scsi_request_fn+0x31a
Should tell us (hoping you build with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO).
James
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-30 14:06 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-10-31 3:12 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-03 8:02 ` bugme-daemon
` (38 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-10-31 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #4 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-10-30 20:12 -------
Thanks Yi's help.
After enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, this bug can not reproduce on 2.6.28-rc1. but
it still exists on 28-rc2 kernel. Soft lockup catchs several times lockup. And
they are same as the following one.
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [mke2fs:3918]
Modules linked in: e1000e [last unloaded: microcode]
Modules linked in: e1000e [last unloaded: microcode]
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff8033f311>] ? blk_invoke_request_fn+0x76/0x11a
[<ffffffff8033f872>] ? __blk_run_queue+0x2a/0x2e
[<ffffffff803f2b5a>] ? scsi_run_queue+0x2c7/0x2de
[<ffffffff803f31b7>] ? scsi_next_command+0x3b/0x4c
[<ffffffff803f3454>] ? scsi_end_request+0x97/0xa9
[<ffffffff803f4112>] ? scsi_io_completion+0x190/0x3a8
[<ffffffff80271930>] ? wb_timer_fn+0x0/0x37
[<ffffffff803ee889>] ? scsi_finish_command+0xb6/0xbf
[<ffffffff803f442b>] ? scsi_softirq_done+0x101/0x109
[<ffffffff80343413>] ? blk_done_softirq+0x68/0x79
[<ffffffff8023d8bc>] ? __do_softirq+0x86/0x14f
[<ffffffff8020c62c>] ? call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020dc21>] ? do_softirq+0x39/0x77
[<ffffffff8023d834>] ? irq_exit+0x44/0x46
[<ffffffff8020de65>] ? do_IRQ+0xc8/0xe7
[<ffffffff8020b8e6>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI> [<ffffffff802b402a>] ? blkdev_write_end+0x0/0x3e
[<ffffffff802aeecb>] ? mark_buffer_dirty+0x14/0x85
[<ffffffff802aefbc>] ? __block_commit_write+0x80/0xb1
[<ffffffff802af173>] ? block_write_end+0x51/0x5d
[<ffffffff802b404a>] ? blkdev_write_end+0x20/0x3e
[<ffffffff8026b060>] ? iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic+0x85/0xb3
[<ffffffff8026c2d0>] ? generic_file_buffered_write+0x1c1/0x628
[<ffffffff8022eb7b>] ? task_rq_lock+0x40/0x75
[<ffffffff8023cef9>] ? current_fs_time+0x27/0x2e
[<ffffffff8026cc41>] ? __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x359/0x3c3
[<ffffffff8026cdb0>] ? generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x40/0x91
[<ffffffff80291c35>] ? do_sync_write+0xe7/0x12b
[<ffffffff8024b982>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x3d
[<ffffffff8039f01c>] ? tty_write+0x211/0x22c
[<ffffffff803a0f51>] ? n_tty_write+0x0/0x31d
[<ffffffff802923e7>] ? vfs_write+0xb3/0x13c
[<ffffffff802928bf>] ? sys_write+0x4c/0x74
[<ffffffff8020b3db>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
I do not know what addr2line show a strange output:
Addr2line -e vmlinux -f blk_invoke_request_fn+0x76 | hexdump
0000000 3f3f 3f0a 3a3f 0a30
0000008
But seems gdb works for this.
(gdb) list *blk_invoke_request_fn+0x76
0xffffffff8033f311 is in blk_invoke_request_fn (include/linux/blkdev.h:456).
451 #define QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT 14 /* non-rotational device (SSD)
*/
452
453 static inline int queue_is_locked(struct request_queue *q)
454 {
455 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
456 spinlock_t *lock = q->queue_lock;
457 return lock && spin_is_locked(lock);
458 #else
459 return 1;
460 #endif
Alex
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.27
@ 2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.27, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.27, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-11-02 55 41 29
2008-10-25 26 25 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937
Subject : ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 9:49 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122536026105643&w=4
Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
Subject : ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
Submitter : Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino-4qZELD6Fgxg39yzSjRtAkw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 13:05 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122545827204957&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11913
Subject : USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free?
Submitter : Helge Deller <deller-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 23:11 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122540833301394&w=4
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11910
Subject : System doesn't restart
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 20:35 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539897518110&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11909
Subject : initrd fails to create bloc devices
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:48 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539280706439&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11908
Subject : linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore
Submitter : Eric Dumazet <dada1-fPLkHRcR87vqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:01 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539004100532&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11906
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 6:39 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122534879721424&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11905
Subject : lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 2:18 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122533314305315&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122541849114444&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11901
Subject : ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
Submitter : Bob Copeland <me-aXfl/3sk2vNUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 09:15 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
Subject : sometime boot failed on T61 laptop
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 02:04 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles-4QvXXjU8Dv4@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings-s/n/eUQHGBpZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11891
Subject : resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem)
Submitter : Markus Meier <maekke-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-29 14:42 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11882
Subject : dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 8:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122518333103345&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
Subject : Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0
Submitter : Helge Hafting <helge.hafting-i5bjtSbraLbLX0NG8FE4ug@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 11:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122519319922377&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11875
Subject : radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected)
Submitter : James Cloos <cloos-GRsvFm/Gh/pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 0:00 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122515210200530&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11873
Subject : unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree
Submitter : Jimmy.Jazz-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org
Date : 2008-10-28 05:09 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11858
Subject : Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9
Submitter : Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-26 9:46 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122501447326698&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
Subject : seq_file does not handle pread()
Submitter : Petr Vandrovec <vandrove-hnqZr3NxcozrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:40 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11849
Subject : default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 12:45 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122485245924125&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11841
Subject : plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc-bmtTS95sd5BUM80lpFwj4w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 10:29 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11834
Subject : iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 21:40 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122445440206101&w=4
Handled-By : reinette chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11828
Subject : Linux 2.6.27-git3: no SD card reader
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon-sh/6fXdz2Rs@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-14 0:54 (20 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122394573904699&w=4
Handled-By : Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list-p3sGCRWkH8CeZLLa646FqQ@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11826
Subject : extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 04:25 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122521238402963&w=4
Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven <arjan-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11822
Subject : ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926]
Submitter : Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 01:26 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
Subject : iwl3945 fails with microcode error
Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-22 02:36 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122450235730661&w=4
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11799
Subject : xorg can not start up with stolen memory
Submitter : arrow zhang <arrow.ebd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 06:08 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
Subject : [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates
Submitter : Gu Rui <chaos.proton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 04:28 (13 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11927
Subject : undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 16:57 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547246401190&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548268920986&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925
Subject : cdrom: missing compat ioctls
Submitter : Andreas Schwab <schwab-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 14:02 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Andreas Schwab <schwab-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548923531545&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11917
Subject : Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 03:21 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18558&action=view
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11911
Subject : new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122522165719760&w=4
Handled-By : Dave <kilroyd-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122539058601588&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11903
Subject : regression: vmalloc easily fail
Submitter : Glauber Costa <glommer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 20:59 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
Handled-By : Glauber Costa <glommer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Nick Piggin <npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11895
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:05 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122522085418555&w=4
Handled-By : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547719810921&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11847
Subject : 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig
Submitter : Matt Mackall <mpm-VDJrAJ4Gl5ZBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 17:09 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487097728241&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=122485633732409&w=4
Handled-By : Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487160129531&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11838
Subject : general protection fault: from release_blocks_on_commit
Submitter : Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 14:03 (13 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/21/248
Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122516096811142&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
Subject : raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
Submitter : Stefan Richter <stefan-r-bz-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 02:08 (9 days old)
Handled-By : Stefan Richter <stefanr-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824#c3
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.27,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11808
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.27
@ 2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.27, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.27, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-11-02 55 41 29
2008-10-25 26 25 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937
Subject : ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date : 2008-10-30 9:49 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122536026105643&w=4
Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
Subject : ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
Submitter : Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Date : 2008-10-31 13:05 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122545827204957&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11913
Subject : USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free?
Submitter : Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Date : 2008-10-30 23:11 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122540833301394&w=4
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11910
Subject : System doesn't restart
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2008-10-30 20:35 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539897518110&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11909
Subject : initrd fails to create bloc devices
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:48 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539280706439&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11908
Subject : linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore
Submitter : Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:01 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539004100532&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11906
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 6:39 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122534879721424&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11905
Subject : lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date : 2008-10-30 2:18 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122533314305315&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122541849114444&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11901
Subject : ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
Submitter : Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 09:15 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
Subject : sometime boot failed on T61 laptop
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 02:04 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11891
Subject : resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem)
Submitter : Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
Date : 2008-10-29 14:42 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11882
Subject : dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-28 8:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122518333103345&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
Subject : Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0
Submitter : Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
Date : 2008-10-28 11:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122519319922377&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11875
Subject : radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected)
Submitter : James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Date : 2008-10-28 0:00 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122515210200530&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11873
Subject : unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree
Submitter : Jimmy.Jazz@gmx.net
Date : 2008-10-28 05:09 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11858
Subject : Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9
Submitter : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date : 2008-10-26 9:46 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122501447326698&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
Subject : seq_file does not handle pread()
Submitter : Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:40 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11849
Subject : default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 12:45 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122485245924125&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11841
Subject : plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2008-10-25 10:29 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11834
Subject : iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Date : 2008-10-19 21:40 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122445440206101&w=4
Handled-By : reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11828
Subject : Linux 2.6.27-git3: no SD card reader
Submitter : J.A. Magallón <jamagallon@ono.com>
Date : 2008-10-14 0:54 (20 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122394573904699&w=4
Handled-By : Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11826
Subject : extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 04:25 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122521238402963&w=4
Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11822
Subject : ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926]
Submitter : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-25 01:26 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
Subject : iwl3945 fails with microcode error
Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date : 2008-10-22 02:36 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122450235730661&w=4
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11799
Subject : xorg can not start up with stolen memory
Submitter : arrow zhang <arrow.ebd@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 06:08 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
Subject : [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates
Submitter : Gu Rui <chaos.proton@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 04:28 (13 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11927
Subject : undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-31 16:57 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547246401190&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548268920986&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925
Subject : cdrom: missing compat ioctls
Submitter : Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date : 2008-10-31 14:02 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548923531545&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11917
Subject : Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2008-10-31 03:21 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18558&action=view
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11911
Subject : new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122522165719760&w=4
Handled-By : Dave <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122539058601588&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11903
Subject : regression: vmalloc easily fail
Submitter : Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-10-28 20:59 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
Handled-By : Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11895
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:05 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122522085418555&w=4
Handled-By : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547719810921&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11847
Subject : 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig
Submitter : Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Date : 2008-10-24 17:09 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487097728241&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=122485633732409&w=4
Handled-By : Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487160129531&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11838
Subject : general protection fault: from release_blocks_on_commit
Submitter : Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 14:03 (13 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/21/248
Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122516096811142&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
Subject : raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
Submitter : Stefan Richter <stefan-r-bz@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date : 2008-10-25 02:08 (9 days old)
Handled-By : Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824#c3
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.27,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11808
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11798] [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gu Rui
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
Subject : [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates
Submitter : Gu Rui <chaos.proton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 04:28 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11798] [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates
@ 2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gu Rui
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11798
Subject : [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates
Submitter : Gu Rui <chaos.proton@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 04:28 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11799] xorg can not start up with stolen memory
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, arrow zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11799
Subject : xorg can not start up with stolen memory
Submitter : arrow zhang <arrow.ebd-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 06:08 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11824] raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Stefan Richter, Stefan Richter
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
Subject : raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
Submitter : Stefan Richter <stefan-r-bz-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 02:08 (9 days old)
Handled-By : Stefan Richter <stefanr-MtYdepGKPcBMYopoZt5u/LNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824#c3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11806] iwl3945 fails with microcode error
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
Subject : iwl3945 fails with microcode error
Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-22 02:36 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122450235730661&w=4
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11822] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926]
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Len Brown
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11822
Subject : ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926]
Submitter : Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 01:26 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11826] extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Arjan van de Ven, Carlos R. Mafra, Frans Pop,
Yves-Alexis Perez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11826
Subject : extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 04:25 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122521238402963&w=4
Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven <arjan-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11799] xorg can not start up with stolen memory
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, arrow zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11799
Subject : xorg can not start up with stolen memory
Submitter : arrow zhang <arrow.ebd@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 06:08 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11824] raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Stefan Richter, Stefan Richter
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
Subject : raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
Submitter : Stefan Richter <stefan-r-bz@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date : 2008-10-25 02:08 (9 days old)
Handled-By : Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824#c3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11822] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926]
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Len Brown
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11822
Subject : ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926]
Submitter : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-25 01:26 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11806] iwl3945 fails with microcode error
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
Subject : iwl3945 fails with microcode error
Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date : 2008-10-22 02:36 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122450235730661&w=4
Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11826] extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1
@ 2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Arjan van de Ven, Carlos R. Mafra, Frans Pop,
Yves-Alexis Perez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11826
Subject : extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 04:25 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122521238402963&w=4
Handled-By : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11834] iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, reinette chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11834
Subject : iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 21:40 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122445440206101&w=4
Handled-By : reinette chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11841] plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, François Valenduc
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11841
Subject : plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc-bmtTS95sd5BUM80lpFwj4w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 10:29 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11834] iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, reinette chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11834
Subject : iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Date : 2008-10-19 21:40 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122445440206101&w=4
Handled-By : reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11841] plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, François Valenduc
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11841
Subject : plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2008-10-25 10:29 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11849] default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Snook, Kumar Gala, Scott Wood
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11849
Subject : default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 12:45 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122485245924125&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11847] 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fenghua Yu, Matt Mackall
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11847
Subject : 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig
Submitter : Matt Mackall <mpm-VDJrAJ4Gl5ZBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 17:09 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487097728241&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=122485633732409&w=4
Handled-By : Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487160129531&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Carlos R. Mafra, Jens Axboe,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Tomas Winkler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Hidehiro Kawai,
Linus Torvalds, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Carlos R. Mafra, Jens Axboe,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Tomas Winkler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11847] 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fenghua Yu, Matt Mackall
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11847
Subject : 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig
Submitter : Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Date : 2008-10-24 17:09 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487097728241&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=122485633732409&w=4
Handled-By : Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122487160129531&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11849] default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Snook, Kumar Gala, Scott Wood
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11849
Subject : default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date : 2008-10-24 12:45 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122485245924125&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Hidehiro Kawai,
Linus Torvalds, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11873] unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, "Jimmy.Jazz-hi6Y0CQ0nG0,
Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11873
Subject : unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree
Submitter : Jimmy.Jazz-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org
Date : 2008-10-28 05:09 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11858] Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11858
Subject : Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9
Submitter : Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-26 9:46 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122501447326698&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11856] seq_file does not handle pread()
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Petr Vandrovec
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
Subject : seq_file does not handle pread()
Submitter : Petr Vandrovec <vandrove-hnqZr3NxcozrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:40 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11856] seq_file does not handle pread()
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Petr Vandrovec
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
Subject : seq_file does not handle pread()
Submitter : Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Date : 2008-10-25 17:40 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11858] Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11858
Subject : Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9
Submitter : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date : 2008-10-26 9:46 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122501447326698&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11873] unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, "Jimmy.Jazz, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11873
Subject : unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree
Submitter : Jimmy.Jazz@gmx.net
Date : 2008-10-28 05:09 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11881] Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Helge Hafting
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
Subject : Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0
Submitter : Helge Hafting <helge.hafting-i5bjtSbraLbLX0NG8FE4ug@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 11:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122519319922377&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11875] radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected)
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
David S. Miller, James Cloos, Linus Torvalds
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11875
Subject : radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected)
Submitter : James Cloos <cloos-GRsvFm/Gh/pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 0:00 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122515210200530&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11882] dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra,
Zhang, Yanmin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11882
Subject : dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 8:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122518333103345&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11881] Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Helge Hafting
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
Subject : Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0
Submitter : Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
Date : 2008-10-28 11:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122519319922377&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11875] radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected)
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
David S. Miller, James Cloos, Linus Torvalds
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11875
Subject : radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected)
Submitter : James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Date : 2008-10-28 0:00 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122515210200530&w=4
Handled-By : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11882] dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Mike Galbraith, Peter Zijlstra,
Zhang, Yanmin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11882
Subject : dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-28 8:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122518333103345&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11891] resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem)
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes,
Markus Meier
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11891
Subject : resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem)
Submitter : Markus Meier <maekke-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-29 14:42 (5 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11894] 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ben Hutchings, Jonathan McDowell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles-4QvXXjU8Dv4@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings-s/n/eUQHGBpZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11895] 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11895
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:05 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122522085418555&w=4
Handled-By : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547719810921&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11891] resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem)
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes,
Markus Meier
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11891
Subject : resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem)
Submitter : Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org>
Date : 2008-10-29 14:42 (5 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11895] 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11895
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:05 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122522085418555&w=4
Handled-By : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547719810921&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11894] 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ben Hutchings, Jonathan McDowell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11899] sometime boot failed on T61 laptop
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
Subject : sometime boot failed on T61 laptop
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 02:04 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11901] ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11901
Subject : ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
Submitter : Bob Copeland <me-aXfl/3sk2vNUbtYUoyoikg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 09:15 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11903] regression: vmalloc easily fail
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Glauber Costa, Linus Torvalds,
Nick Piggin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11903
Subject : regression: vmalloc easily fail
Submitter : Glauber Costa <glommer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 20:59 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
Handled-By : Glauber Costa <glommer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Nick Piggin <npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11899] sometime boot failed on T61 laptop
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
Subject : sometime boot failed on T61 laptop
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 02:04 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11901] ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11901
Subject : ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
Submitter : Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 09:15 (4 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11903] regression: vmalloc easily fail
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Glauber Costa, Linus Torvalds,
Nick Piggin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11903
Subject : regression: vmalloc easily fail
Submitter : Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-10-28 20:59 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
Handled-By : Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122522755530998&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11909] initrd fails to create bloc devices
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11909
Subject : initrd fails to create bloc devices
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:48 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539280706439&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11906] 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gene Heskett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11906
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 6:39 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122534879721424&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11905] lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Theodore Ts'o, Thomas Gleixner,
Venki Pallipadi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11905
Subject : lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 2:18 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122533314305315&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122541849114444&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11908] linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Dumazet, Jesper Dangaard Brouer,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11908
Subject : linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore
Submitter : Eric Dumazet <dada1-fPLkHRcR87vqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:01 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539004100532&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11905] lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Theodore Ts'o, Thomas Gleixner,
Venki Pallipadi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11905
Subject : lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date : 2008-10-30 2:18 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122533314305315&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122541849114444&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11909] initrd fails to create bloc devices
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11909
Subject : initrd fails to create bloc devices
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:48 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539280706439&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11906] 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gene Heskett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11906
Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 6:39 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122534879721424&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11908] linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Dumazet, Jesper Dangaard Brouer,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11908
Subject : linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore
Submitter : Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 18:01 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539004100532&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11911] new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov, Dave
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11911
Subject : new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122522165719760&w=4
Handled-By : Dave <kilroyd-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122539058601588&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11910] System doesn't restart
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11910
Subject : System doesn't restart
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 20:35 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539897518110&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11913] USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free?
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Helge Deller, Jeroen Roovers, Jiri Kosina,
Jiri Slaby
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11913
Subject : USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free?
Submitter : Helge Deller <deller-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 23:11 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122540833301394&w=4
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11917] Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Alexey Starikovskiy
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11917
Subject : Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 03:21 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18558&action=view
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11911] new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrey Borzenkov, Dave
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11911
Subject : new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Date : 2008-10-28 19:19 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122522165719760&w=4
Handled-By : Dave <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122539058601588&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11910] System doesn't restart
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11910
Subject : System doesn't restart
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2008-10-30 20:35 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122539897518110&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11913] USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free?
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Helge Deller, Jeroen Roovers, Jiri Kosina,
Jiri Slaby
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11913
Subject : USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free?
Submitter : Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Date : 2008-10-30 23:11 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122540833301394&w=4
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11917] Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Alexey Starikovskiy
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11917
Subject : Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2008-10-31 03:21 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18558&action=view
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11927] undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan, Al Viro
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11927
Subject : undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 16:57 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547246401190&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548268920986&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11925] cdrom: missing compat ioctls
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andreas Schwab
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925
Subject : cdrom: missing compat ioctls
Submitter : Andreas Schwab <schwab-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 14:02 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Andreas Schwab <schwab-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548923531545&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11928] ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino,
Matthew Garrett, Nick Kossifidis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
Subject : ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
Submitter : Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino-4qZELD6Fgxg39yzSjRtAkw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-31 13:05 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122545827204957&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11925] cdrom: missing compat ioctls
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andreas Schwab
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925
Subject : cdrom: missing compat ioctls
Submitter : Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date : 2008-10-31 14:02 (3 days old)
Handled-By : Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548923531545&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11927] undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan, Al Viro
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11927
Subject : undefined reference to `save_stack_trace'
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-31 16:57 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122547246401190&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122548268920986&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11928] ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino,
Matthew Garrett, Nick Kossifidis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
Subject : ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal
Submitter : Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Date : 2008-10-31 13:05 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122545827204957&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11937] ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Meelis Roos,
Simon Arlott, Theodore Tso
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937
Subject : ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 9:49 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122536026105643&w=4
Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11937] ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Meelis Roos,
Simon Arlott, Theodore Tso
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937
Subject : ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date : 2008-10-30 9:49 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122536026105643&w=4
Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11940] Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov, Hugh Dickins
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11940] Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
@ 2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov, Hugh Dickins
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11824] raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 19:14 ` Stefan Richter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2008-11-02 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Kernel Testers List, linux1394-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote at LKML:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, it is still open.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
> Subject : raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
> Submitter : Stefan Richter <stefan-r-bz@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Date : 2008-10-25 02:08 (9 days old)
> Handled-By : Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824#c3
The patch has been committed to linux1394-2.6.git (commit
638570b54346f140bc09b986d93e76025d35180f in the branches misc, for-next,
master) and I plan to send a pull request in a few days if I receive no
objections.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =-== ---=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11824] raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
@ 2008-11-02 19:14 ` Stefan Richter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2008-11-02 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, linux1394-devel
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote at LKML:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, it is still open.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824
> Subject : raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app
> Submitter : Stefan Richter <stefan-r-bz@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Date : 2008-10-25 02:08 (9 days old)
> Handled-By : Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11824#c3
The patch has been committed to linux1394-2.6.git (commit
638570b54346f140bc09b986d93e76025d35180f in the branches misc, for-next,
master) and I plan to send a pull request in a few days if I receive no
objections.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =-== ---=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11901] ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2008-11-02 19:24 ` Bob Copeland
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Bob Copeland @ 2008-11-02 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:07:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11901
> Subject : ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx
> Submitter : Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
> Date : 2008-10-30 09:15 (4 days old)
Thanks, I just posted a patch for this here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/2/157
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11940] Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2008-11-02 21:04 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20081102.130409.86443785.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-11-02 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, a.beregalov, hugh
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:07:10 +0100 (CET)
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
> Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
> Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
> Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
> Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
Patch is now in Linus's tree:
commit 145e1c0023585e0e8f6df22316308ec61c5066b2
Author: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Date: Sat Nov 1 21:41:40 2008 -0700
sparc64: Fix __copy_{to,from}_user_inatomic defines.
Alexander Beregalov reports oops in __bzero() called from
copy_from_user_fixup() called from iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(),
when running dbench on tmpfs on sparc64: its __copy_from_user_inatomic
and __copy_to_user_inatomic should be avoiding, not calling, the fixups.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 21:09 ` Vegard Nossum
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2008-11-02 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
Been trying to reproduce this one since I saw it, and I think it can
be written off as can't reproduce :-(
Maybe I can contribute a patch that verifies that the return value ==
strlen(buffer), WARN_ON otherwise? And hope that somebody runs into
it.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
@ 2008-11-02 21:09 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2008-11-02 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
Been trying to reproduce this one since I saw it, and I think it can
be written off as can't reproduce :-(
Maybe I can contribute a patch that verifies that the return value ==
strlen(buffer), WARN_ON otherwise? And hope that somebody runs into
it.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11940] Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
2008-11-02 21:04 ` David Miller
@ 2008-11-02 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:07:10 +0100 (CET)
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
> > Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
> > Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
> > Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
>
> Patch is now in Linus's tree:
>
> commit 145e1c0023585e0e8f6df22316308ec61c5066b2
> Author: Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Sat Nov 1 21:41:40 2008 -0700
>
> sparc64: Fix __copy_{to,from}_user_inatomic defines.
>
> Alexander Beregalov reports oops in __bzero() called from
> copy_from_user_fixup() called from iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(),
> when running dbench on tmpfs on sparc64: its __copy_from_user_inatomic
> and __copy_to_user_inatomic should be avoiding, not calling, the fixups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11940] Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
@ 2008-11-02 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, a.beregalov, hugh
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 17:07:10 +0100 (CET)
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11940
> > Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic
> > Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2008-11-01 14:23 (2 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122554945922521&w=4
> > Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122556602913200&w=4
>
> Patch is now in Linus's tree:
>
> commit 145e1c0023585e0e8f6df22316308ec61c5066b2
> Author: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> Date: Sat Nov 1 21:41:40 2008 -0700
>
> sparc64: Fix __copy_{to,from}_user_inatomic defines.
>
> Alexander Beregalov reports oops in __bzero() called from
> copy_from_user_fixup() called from iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(),
> when running dbench on tmpfs on sparc64: its __copy_from_user_inatomic
> and __copy_to_user_inatomic should be avoiding, not calling, the fixups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 21:18 ` Vegard Nossum
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2008-11-02 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Hidehiro Kawai, Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
> Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
This is in mainline as of
commit ef2cabf7c6d838eb0ee2b4fb8ef84f7c06ce16d9
Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 22:53:05 2008 -0400
ext4: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext4_abort
commit 44d6f78756560e95903de239e10f8a40a6eae444
Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon Oct 27 22:51:46 2008 -0400
ext3: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext3_abort
Thanks for quick action, by the way :-)
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
@ 2008-11-02 21:18 ` Vegard Nossum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2008-11-02 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Hidehiro Kawai, Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
> Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
This is in mainline as of
commit ef2cabf7c6d838eb0ee2b4fb8ef84f7c06ce16d9
Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 22:53:05 2008 -0400
ext4: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext4_abort
commit 44d6f78756560e95903de239e10f8a40a6eae444
Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon Oct 27 22:51:46 2008 -0400
ext3: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext3_abort
Thanks for quick action, by the way :-)
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11937] ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 21:26 ` Theodore Tso
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2008-11-02 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Meelis Roos, Simon Arlott
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:07:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937
> Subject : ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
> Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-30 9:49 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122536026105643&w=4
> Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
Yep, should still be listed. As mentioned in the BZ entry, there is a
proposed patch here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/1/61
I'm waiting for feedback from the people who have run accross the bug.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11937] ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
@ 2008-11-02 21:26 ` Theodore Tso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2008-11-02 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Meelis Roos, Simon Arlott
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:07:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11937
> Subject : ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions
> Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
> Date : 2008-10-30 9:49 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122536026105643&w=4
> Handled-By : Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Yep, should still be listed. As mentioned in the BZ entry, there is a
proposed patch here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/1/61
I'm waiting for feedback from the people who have run accross the bug.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11905] lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 21:28 ` Theodore Tso
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2008-11-02 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Gleixner,
Venki Pallipadi
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:07:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11905
> Subject : lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
> Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-30 2:18 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122533314305315&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122541849114444&w=4
Yup, should still be listed.
Is someone looking what the proper fix should be (other than reverting
the commit in question)? I've been running with the commit reverted
on my laptop kernel for a couple of days now, with no problems.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11905] lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
@ 2008-11-02 21:28 ` Theodore Tso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Tso @ 2008-11-02 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Thomas Gleixner,
Venki Pallipadi
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:07:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11905
> Subject : lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W
> Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Date : 2008-10-30 2:18 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122533314305315&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122541849114444&w=4
Yup, should still be listed.
Is someone looking what the proper fix should be (other than reverting
the commit in question)? I've been running with the commit reverted
on my laptop kernel for a couple of days now, with no problems.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
2008-11-02 21:09 ` Vegard Nossum
@ 2008-11-02 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
> > Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
> > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
>
> Been trying to reproduce this one since I saw it, and I think it can
> be written off as can't reproduce :-(
Done.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
@ 2008-11-02 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11854
> > Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace
> > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2008-10-25 17:14 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122495490201663&w=4
>
> Been trying to reproduce this one since I saw it, and I think it can
> be written off as can't reproduce :-(
Done.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
2008-11-02 21:18 ` Vegard Nossum
@ 2008-11-02 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Hidehiro Kawai, Linus Torvalds
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
> > Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
> > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
> > Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
>
> This is in mainline as of
>
> commit ef2cabf7c6d838eb0ee2b4fb8ef84f7c06ce16d9
> Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon Oct 27 22:53:05 2008 -0400
>
> ext4: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext4_abort
>
> commit 44d6f78756560e95903de239e10f8a40a6eae444
> Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez-FCd8Q96Dh0JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon Oct 27 22:51:46 2008 -0400
>
> ext3: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext3_abort
>
> Thanks for quick action, by the way :-)
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
@ 2008-11-02 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton,
Hidehiro Kawai, Linus Torvalds
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11852
> > Subject : v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd
> > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2008-10-25 11:22 (9 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122493379905812&w=4
> > Handled-By : Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510792614388&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122510828015045&w=4
>
> This is in mainline as of
>
> commit ef2cabf7c6d838eb0ee2b4fb8ef84f7c06ce16d9
> Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 27 22:53:05 2008 -0400
>
> ext4: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext4_abort
>
> commit 44d6f78756560e95903de239e10f8a40a6eae444
> Author: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 27 22:51:46 2008 -0400
>
> ext3: fix a bug accessing freed memory in ext3_abort
>
> Thanks for quick action, by the way :-)
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 22:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2008-11-02 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe,
Tomas Winkler
On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
> Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
> Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
> Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
> Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
is now in Linus' tree.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
@ 2008-11-02 22:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Carlos R. Mafra @ 2008-11-02 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe,
Tomas Winkler
On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
> Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
> Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
> Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
is now in Linus' tree.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
2008-11-02 22:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
@ 2008-11-02 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe,
Tomas Winkler
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
> > Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
> > Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
> > Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
>
> It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
> is now in Linus' tree.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
@ 2008-11-02 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos R. Mafra
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe,
Tomas Winkler
On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
> > Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
> > Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
>
> It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
> is now in Linus' tree.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-31 3:12 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-03 8:02 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-04 7:37 ` bugme-daemon
` (37 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-03 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #5 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-03 00:02 -------
still exists in rc3
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
2008-11-02 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-03 9:04 ` Tomas Winkler
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Winkler @ 2008-11-03 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Carlos R. Mafra, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Jens Axboe
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>> On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of recent regressions.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> > (either way).
>> >
>> >
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
>> > Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
>> > Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> > Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
>> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
>> > Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
>>
>> It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
>> is now in Linus' tree.
>
> Thanks, closed.
Is this queued also for 2.6.27 stable ? My email was bounced back
I've used linux-stable-4mT8j8lBKmdzeIdxy0IIJw@public.gmane.org
Thanks
Tomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
@ 2008-11-03 9:04 ` Tomas Winkler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Winkler @ 2008-11-03 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Carlos R. Mafra, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Jens Axboe
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>> On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of recent regressions.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> > (either way).
>> >
>> >
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
>> > Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
>> > Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
>> > Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
>> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>> > Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
>> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
>>
>> It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
>> is now in Linus' tree.
>
> Thanks, closed.
Is this queued also for 2.6.27 stable ? My email was bounced back
I've used linux-stable@veger.kernel.org
Thanks
Tomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
2008-11-03 9:04 ` Tomas Winkler
@ 2008-11-03 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-03 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomas Winkler
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Carlos R. Mafra, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe
* Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> >> On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of recent regressions.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >> > (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
> >> > Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
> >> > Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> > Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
> >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
> >> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
> >> > Tomas Winkler <tomasw-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
> >>
> >> It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
> >> is now in Linus' tree.
> >
> > Thanks, closed.
>
> Is this queued also for 2.6.27 stable ? My email was bounced back
> I've used linux-stable-4mT8j8lBKmdzeIdxy0IIJw@public.gmane.org
three typos caused thebounce. It's stable-DgEjT+Ai2yi4UlQgPVntAg@public.gmane.org
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
@ 2008-11-03 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-03 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomas Winkler
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Carlos R. Mafra, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe
* Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 of November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> >> On Sun 2.Nov'08 at 17:07:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of recent regressions.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >> > (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11845
> >> > Subject : Suspend regression on Lenovo x60
> >> > Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> >> > Date : 2008-10-24 18:02 (10 days old)
> >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=122487159829507&w=4
> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122512449714310&w=4
> >> > Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> > Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
> >> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122513311900482&w=4
> >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122518625308673&w=4
> >>
> >> It is fixed by commit 10d0bd56966571d0324dfd9bbb8aa913a60bef5f which
> >> is now in Linus' tree.
> >
> > Thanks, closed.
>
> Is this queued also for 2.6.27 stable ? My email was bounced back
> I've used linux-stable@veger.kernel.org
three typos caused thebounce. It's stable@kernel.org.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11894] 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2008-11-03 12:25 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-11-03 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2008-11-03 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jonathan McDowell
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:07 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
> Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
> Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
> Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
> Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
I decoded the oops. Jonathan has been fixing it himself.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11894] 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
2008-11-03 12:25 ` Ben Hutchings
@ 2008-11-03 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-03 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jonathan McDowell
On Monday, 3 of November 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:07 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
> > Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
> > Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles-4QvXXjU8Dv4@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
> > Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings-s/n/eUQHGBpZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>
>
> I decoded the oops. Jonathan has been fixing it himself.
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11894] 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
@ 2008-11-03 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-03 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jonathan McDowell
On Monday, 3 of November 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:07 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11894
> > Subject : 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops
> > Submitter : Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
> > Date : 2008-10-29 16:40 (5 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122529846811013&w=4
> > Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
>
> I decoded the oops. Jonathan has been fixing it himself.
Thanks, updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-03 8:02 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-04 7:37 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-04 7:41 ` bugme-daemon
` (36 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-04 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #6 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-03 23:37 -------
The hang palce is spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock) in function scsi_request_fn:
not_ready:
spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
/*
* lock q, handle tag, requeue req, and decrement device_busy. We
* must return with queue_lock held.
*
* Decrementing device_busy without checking it is OK, as all such
* cases (host limits or settings) should run the queue at some
* later time.
*/
======> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
blk_requeue_request(q, req);
sdev->device_busy--;
if(sdev->device_busy == 0)
blk_plug_device(q);
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-04 7:37 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-04 7:41 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-04 9:05 ` bugme-daemon
` (35 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-04 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #7 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-03 23:41 -------
I try it by booting kernel with maxcpus=1 and hang still happens, so it looks
like the thread locks itself. nmi_watchdog seems not work.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-04 7:41 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-04 9:05 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 1:32 ` bugme-daemon
` (34 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-04 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #8 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-04 01:05 -------
More debug shows, before jumping to not_ready, the last code is at:
if (blk_queue_tagged(q) && !blk_rq_tagged(req)) {
if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry))
list_add_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
&shost->starved_list);
===> goto not_ready;
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11806] iwl3945 fails with microcode error
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-04 22:33 ` reinette chatre
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: reinette chatre @ 2008-11-04 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 08:06 -0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
> Subject : iwl3945 fails with microcode error
> Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-22 02:36 (12 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122450235730661&w=4
> Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
A patch for this issue has just been sent to John Linville.
Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122583010822172&w=2
Reinette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11806] iwl3945 fails with microcode error
@ 2008-11-04 22:33 ` reinette chatre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: reinette chatre @ 2008-11-04 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 08:06 -0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
> Subject : iwl3945 fails with microcode error
> Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Date : 2008-10-22 02:36 (12 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122450235730661&w=4
> Handled-By : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
>
A patch for this issue has just been sent to John Linville.
Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122583010822172&w=2
Reinette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-04 9:05 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 1:32 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 1:55 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 1:56 ` bugme-daemon
` (33 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #9 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 17:32 -------
I did bisect for this bug and find the following commit cause this problem.
commit f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun Aug 17 15:24:38 2008 -0500
[SCSI] Add helper code so transport classes/driver can control queueing
(v3)
SCSI-ml manages the queueing limits for the device and host, but
does not do so at the target level. However something something similar
can come in userful when a driver is transitioning a transport object to
the the blocked state, becuase at that time we do not want to queue
io and we do not want the queuecommand to be called again.
Alex
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-05 1:32 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 1:55 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 2:10 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2008-11-05 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugme-daemon; +Cc: linux-scsi
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 17:32 -------
> I did bisect for this bug and find the following commit cause this problem.
>
> commit f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
> Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Ok, I am looking into this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 1:32 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 1:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 2:11 ` bugme-daemon
` (32 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #10 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-04 17:56 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 17:32 -------
> I did bisect for this bug and find the following commit cause this problem.
>
> commit f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
> Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Ok, I am looking into this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-05 1:55 ` Mike Christie
@ 2008-11-05 2:10 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-11-05 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Christie; +Cc: bugme-daemon, linux-scsi
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 19:55 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Comment #9 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 17:32 -------
> > I did bisect for this bug and find the following commit cause this problem.
> >
> > commit f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
> > Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>
> Ok, I am looking into this.
I have a theoretical case that might trigger an endless loop:
Supposing we actually get a two deep starved list. On first pass, we
process the first entry, but set starved_head to be it. On second pass,
we get a host_busy. Now we will loop forever (because we have a single
entry sdev and it's not starved_head) under the host lock, which means
we can never unbusy the host.
A fix would be to set starved_head to NULL after we delete sdev from the
list.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 1:56 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 2:11 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 2:43 ` bugme-daemon
` (31 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #11 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-04 18:11 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 19:55 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Comment #9 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 17:32 -------
> > I did bisect for this bug and find the following commit cause this problem.
> >
> > commit f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
> > Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>
> Ok, I am looking into this.
I have a theoretical case that might trigger an endless loop:
Supposing we actually get a two deep starved list. On first pass, we
process the first entry, but set starved_head to be it. On second pass,
we get a host_busy. Now we will loop forever (because we have a single
entry sdev and it's not starved_head) under the host lock, which means
we can never unbusy the host.
A fix would be to set starved_head to NULL after we delete sdev from the
list.
James
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 2:11 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 2:43 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 2:56 ` bugme-daemon
` (30 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #12 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-04 18:43 -------
I changed the softlockup_thresh to 10, then I found scsi lib enters a dead
loop, but not in a spin-lock hang. Mostly, kernel dumps stack info when
spin_unlock_irq.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 2:43 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 2:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 3:19 ` bugme-daemon
` (29 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #13 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-04 18:56 -------
So the scenario is during the first pass, the first sdev is moved away from the
list and processed successfully (Not added back). Then, the second one in the
list will cause the dead loop.
So just do
if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry) && sdev == starved_head) {
starved_head = NULL;
}
in the tail of the while in function scsi_run_queue.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 2:56 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 3:19 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 4:01 ` bugme-daemon
` (28 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #14 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-04 19:19 -------
James,
Your method does fix the issue. Would you like to push the patch to 2.6.28-rc4?
It stops my performance testing with the latest kernel.
Thanks,
yanmin
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 3:19 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 4:01 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-05 4:26 ` bugme-daemon
` (27 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #15 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 20:01 -------
the fix is right. and "sdev == starved_head" does not need according code
context. so the following patch works too.
--- scsi_lib.c.orig 2008-11-04 13:07:16.000000000 -0800
+++ scsi_lib.c 2008-11-04 13:07:38.000000000 -0800
@@ -607,6 +607,8 @@
spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry) )
+ starved_head = NULL;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 4:01 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 4:26 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 10:48 ` bugme-daemon
` (26 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #16 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-04 20:26 -------
Alex,
Your patch is not optimized.
yanmin
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 4:26 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 10:48 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 14:32 ` bugme-daemon
` (25 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #17 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-11-05 02:48 -------
Caused by:
commit f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Author: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun Aug 17 15:24:38 2008 -0500
[SCSI] Add helper code so transport classes/driver can control queueing
(v3)
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 10:48 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 14:32 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 15:25 ` bugme-daemon
` (24 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #18 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-11-05 06:32 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Alex,
>
> Your patch is not optimized.
What do you mean exactly?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-05 4:01 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-05 17:25 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-11-05 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugme-daemon; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:01 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #15 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 20:01 -------
> the fix is right. and "sdev == starved_head" does not need according code
> context. so the following patch works too.
>
> --- scsi_lib.c.orig 2008-11-04 13:07:16.000000000 -0800
> +++ scsi_lib.c 2008-11-04 13:07:38.000000000 -0800
> @@ -607,6 +607,8 @@
> spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>
> spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
> + if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry) )
> + starved_head = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
Actually, no. The correct patch is below.
The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
something which allows this to happen.
It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
James
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
}
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
+ starved_entry = NULL;
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 14:32 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 15:25 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 17:25 ` bugme-daemon
` (23 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #19 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-05 07:25 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:01 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #15 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 20:01 -------
> the fix is right. and "sdev == starved_head" does not need according code
> context. so the following patch works too.
>
> --- scsi_lib.c.orig 2008-11-04 13:07:16.000000000 -0800
> +++ scsi_lib.c 2008-11-04 13:07:38.000000000 -0800
> @@ -607,6 +607,8 @@
> spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>
> spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
> + if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry) )
> + starved_head = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
Actually, no. The correct patch is below.
The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
something which allows this to happen.
It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
James
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
}
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
+ starved_entry = NULL;
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-05 15:24 ` James Bottomley
@ 2008-11-05 17:25 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-09 15:47 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 2 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2008-11-05 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: bugme-daemon, linux-scsi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1732 bytes --]
James Bottomley wrote:
> The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> something which allows this to happen.
>
> It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
>
> James
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> }
>
> list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> + starved_entry = NULL;
Should this be starved_head?
> spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
>
> spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>
Do you think we can just splice the list like the attached patch (patch
is example only and is not tested)?
I thought the code is clearer, but I think it may be less efficient. If
scsi_run_queue is run on multiple processors then with the attached
patch one processor would splice the list and possibly have to execute
__blk_run_queue for all the devices on the list serially.
Currently we can at least prep the devices in parallel. One processor
would grab one entry on the list and drop the host lock, so then another
processor could grab another entry on the list and start the execution
process (I wrote start the process because it might turn out that this
second entry execution might have to wait on the first one when the scsi
layer has to grab the queue lock again).
[-- Attachment #2: splice.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1666 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..21a436b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -567,15 +567,23 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
+ LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
+
+ /*
+ * splice the list in case the target busy check or the
+ * request_fn's busy checks want to readd the sdev onto
+ * the starved list.
+ */
+ list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
+ while (!list_empty(&starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
int flagset;
/*
@@ -588,17 +596,8 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* scsi_request_fn must get the host_lock before checking
* or modifying starved_list or starved_entry.
*/
- sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
+ sdev = list_entry(starved_list.next,
struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
- /*
- * The *queue_ready functions can add a device back onto the
- * starved list's tail, so we must check for a infinite loop.
- */
- if (sdev == starved_head)
- break;
- if (!starved_head)
- starved_head = sdev;
-
if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
&shost->starved_list);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 15:25 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 17:25 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 18:47 ` bugme-daemon
` (22 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #20 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-05 09:25 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
James Bottomley wrote:
> The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> something which allows this to happen.
>
> It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
>
> James
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> }
>
> list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> + starved_entry = NULL;
Should this be starved_head?
> spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
>
> spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>
Do you think we can just splice the list like the attached patch (patch
is example only and is not tested)?
I thought the code is clearer, but I think it may be less efficient. If
scsi_run_queue is run on multiple processors then with the attached
patch one processor would splice the list and possibly have to execute
__blk_run_queue for all the devices on the list serially.
Currently we can at least prep the devices in parallel. One processor
would grab one entry on the list and drop the host lock, so then another
processor could grab another entry on the list and start the execution
process (I wrote start the process because it might turn out that this
second entry execution might have to wait on the first one when the scsi
layer has to grab the queue lock again).
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..21a436b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -567,15 +567,23 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host
*shost)
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
+ LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
{
+
+ /*
+ * splice the list in case the target busy check or the
+ * request_fn's busy checks want to readd the sdev onto
+ * the starved list.
+ */
+ list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
+ while (!list_empty(&starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
int flagset;
/*
@@ -588,17 +596,8 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* scsi_request_fn must get the host_lock before checking
* or modifying starved_list or starved_entry.
*/
- sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
+ sdev = list_entry(starved_list.next,
struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
- /*
- * The *queue_ready functions can add a device back onto the
- * starved list's tail, so we must check for a infinite loop.
- */
- if (sdev == starved_head)
- break;
- if (!starved_head)
- starved_head = sdev;
-
if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
&shost->starved_list);
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-05 17:25 ` Mike Christie
@ 2008-11-05 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-09 15:47 ` James Bottomley
1 sibling, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-11-05 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Christie; +Cc: bugme-daemon, linux-scsi
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> > apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> > something which allows this to happen.
> >
> > It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> > because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> > the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> > drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
> >
> > James
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > }
> >
> > list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> > + starved_entry = NULL;
>
> Should this be starved_head?
Yes, sorry, constructed patch on 'plane and didn't compile it.
> > spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
> >
>
> Do you think we can just splice the list like the attached patch (patch
> is example only and is not tested)?
Afraid not ... you could still get a starved_head that's no longer
current (it gets tagged as starved_head then removed from the spliced
starved_list and then continued lower down) which would still cause the
endless loop.
> I thought the code is clearer, but I think it may be less efficient. If
> scsi_run_queue is run on multiple processors then with the attached
> patch one processor would splice the list and possibly have to execute
> __blk_run_queue for all the devices on the list serially.
>
> Currently we can at least prep the devices in parallel. One processor
> would grab one entry on the list and drop the host lock, so then another
> processor could grab another entry on the list and start the execution
> process (I wrote start the process because it might turn out that this
> second entry execution might have to wait on the first one when the scsi
> layer has to grab the queue lock again).
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 17:25 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-05 18:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 1:44 ` bugme-daemon
` (21 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-05 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #21 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-05 10:47 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> > apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> > something which allows this to happen.
> >
> > It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> > because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> > the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> > drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
> >
> > James
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > }
> >
> > list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> > + starved_entry = NULL;
>
> Should this be starved_head?
Yes, sorry, constructed patch on 'plane and didn't compile it.
> > spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
> >
>
> Do you think we can just splice the list like the attached patch (patch
> is example only and is not tested)?
Afraid not ... you could still get a starved_head that's no longer
current (it gets tagged as starved_head then removed from the spliced
starved_list and then continued lower down) which would still cause the
endless loop.
> I thought the code is clearer, but I think it may be less efficient. If
> scsi_run_queue is run on multiple processors then with the attached
> patch one processor would splice the list and possibly have to execute
> __blk_run_queue for all the devices on the list serially.
>
> Currently we can at least prep the devices in parallel. One processor
> would grab one entry on the list and drop the host lock, so then another
> processor could grab another entry on the list and start the execution
> process (I wrote start the process because it might turn out that this
> second entry execution might have to wait on the first one when the scsi
> layer has to grab the queue lock again).
James
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-05 18:47 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-06 1:44 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 1:59 ` bugme-daemon
` (20 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-06 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #22 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 17:44 -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
>
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:01 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Comment #15 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-04 20:01 -------
> > the fix is right. and "sdev == starved_head" does not need according code
> > context. so the following patch works too.
> >
> > --- scsi_lib.c.orig 2008-11-04 13:07:16.000000000 -0800
> > +++ scsi_lib.c 2008-11-04 13:07:38.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -607,6 +607,8 @@
> > spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
> > + if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry) )
> > + starved_head = NULL;
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>
> Actually, no. The correct patch is below.
>
> The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> something which allows this to happen.
>
> It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
>
> James
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> }
>
> list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> + starved_entry = NULL;
> spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
>
> spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
>
It looks like you still don't understand the scenario.
I did a quick testing with your patch. kernel just hangs after booting, before
I start mkfs.ext2.
Consider below scenario: the scsi target isn't busy, but
"if (blk_queue_tagged(q) && !blk_rq_tagged(req))" is true in function
scsi_request_fn, the sdev will be added back to starved_list. But with your
patch, starved_head is reset to NULL to lose his purpose. So although there is
only one sdev in starved_list, function scsi_run_queue enters a dead loop.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 1:44 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-06 1:59 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 2:06 ` bugme-daemon
` (19 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-06 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #23 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 17:59 -------
Let me clarify the scenario again why my machine hangs with pure
2.6.28-rc[123].
In function scsi_run_queue, before enter the while loop, there are 2 sdev on
shost->starved_list.
1) When scsi_run_queue checks the first sdev, scsi_run_queue is set to point to
the first sdev.
2) scsi_run_queue => __blk_run_queue ... =>scsi_request_fn to succeed in
processing the first sdev.
3) scsi_run_queue goes to next loop in while to pick up the second sdev. the
2nd sdev is deleted from starved_list;
4) scsi_run_queue => __blk_run_queue ... =>scsi_request_fn to succeed in
processing the 2nd sdev. Unfortunately, in function scsi_request_fn,
"if (blk_queue_tagged(q) && !blk_rq_tagged(req))" is true this time, so the 2nd
sdev is added back to starved_list. See below codes:
if (blk_queue_tagged(q) && !blk_rq_tagged(req)) {
if (list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry))
========> list_add_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
&shost->starved_list);
goto not_ready;
}
5) scsi_run_queue goes to next loop in while to repeat step from 3) to 5). So
it enters a dead loop.
James' patch doesn't break the dead loop, and even couldn't break it when
starved_list just has a sdev initially.
So the checking should be in the tail of the while loop.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 1:59 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-06 2:06 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 2:19 ` bugme-daemon
` (18 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-06 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #24 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 18:06 -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > Alex,
> >
> > Your patch is not optimized.
>
> What do you mean exactly?
>
Scenario: starved_list consists of 5 sdev. The 1st/2nd/3rd/4th sdev make
"if (blk_queue_tagged(q) && !blk_rq_tagged(req))" true, so they are added back,
but the 5th sdev is ok to be processes and deleted from starved_list. With
Alex's patch, scsi_run_queue will check all the 4 sdev again.
I don't how possible the scenario happens. If it happens very rarely, Alex's
patch is ok. I just speak theoretically.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 2:06 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-06 2:19 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 14:57 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-06 14:58 ` bugme-daemon
` (17 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-06 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #25 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 18:19 -------
Created an attachment (id=18697)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18697&action=view)
Here is the patch to fix it against 2.6.28-rc3.
I tested the patch on my 2 machines and it does fix the issue.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-06 2:19 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-06 14:57 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-11-06 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugme-daemon; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 18:19 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> ------- Comment #25 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 18:19 -------
> Created an attachment (id=18697)
> --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18697&action=view)
> Here is the patch to fix it against 2.6.28-rc3.
>
> I tested the patch on my 2 machines and it does fix the issue.
The problem is that it doesn't fix the theoretical tight loop, so
someone else will run into the issue under more trying circumstances.
The only reason a patch which conditionally NULLs starved_head works
over one that does it absolutely should be that there's some other loop
that requires it being set to effect a break out.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 2:19 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-06 14:58 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-07 1:04 ` bugme-daemon
` (16 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-06 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #26 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-06 06:58 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 18:19 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> ------- Comment #25 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 18:19 -------
> Created an attachment (id=18697)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18697&action=view)
> --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18697&action=view)
> Here is the patch to fix it against 2.6.28-rc3.
>
> I tested the patch on my 2 machines and it does fix the issue.
The problem is that it doesn't fix the theoretical tight loop, so
someone else will run into the issue under more trying circumstances.
The only reason a patch which conditionally NULLs starved_head works
over one that does it absolutely should be that there's some other loop
that requires it being set to effect a break out.
James
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 14:58 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-07 1:04 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 15:47 ` bugme-daemon
` (15 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-07 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #27 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-06 17:04 -------
(In reply to comment #26)
> Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 18:19 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
> > ------- Comment #25 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-05 18:19 -------
> > Created an attachment (id=18697)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18697&action=view) [details]
> > --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18697&action=view)
> > Here is the patch to fix it against 2.6.28-rc3.
> >
> > I tested the patch on my 2 machines and it does fix the issue.
>
> The problem is that it doesn't fix the theoretical tight loop, so
What's the theoretical tight loop the patch doesn't fix? Would you like to
elaborate it?
I know there is a scenario that scsi_target_is_busy might returns true in
scsi_run_queue, but my patch also fixes it.
> someone else will run into the issue under more trying circumstances.
>
> The only reason a patch which conditionally NULLs starved_head works
> over one that does it absolutely should be that there's some other loop
> that requires it being set to effect a break out.
I can't understand what you said. What are the other loop?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-05 17:25 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 18:46 ` James Bottomley
@ 2008-11-09 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-11 18:22 ` Mike Christie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-11-09 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Christie; +Cc: bugme-daemon, linux-scsi
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> > apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> > something which allows this to happen.
> >
> > It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> > because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> > the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> > drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
> >
> > James
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > }
> >
> > list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> > + starved_entry = NULL;
>
> Should this be starved_head?
>
> > spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
> >
>
> Do you think we can just splice the list like the attached patch (patch
> is example only and is not tested)?
>
> I thought the code is clearer, but I think it may be less efficient. If
> scsi_run_queue is run on multiple processors then with the attached
> patch one processor would splice the list and possibly have to execute
> __blk_run_queue for all the devices on the list serially.
>
> Currently we can at least prep the devices in parallel. One processor
> would grab one entry on the list and drop the host lock, so then another
> processor could grab another entry on the list and start the execution
> process (I wrote start the process because it might turn out that this
> second entry execution might have to wait on the first one when the scsi
> layer has to grab the queue lock again).
I reconsidered: I think something like this would work well if we
simply to run through the starved list once each time, giving them the
chance of executing. Something like this.
James
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..979e07a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -567,15 +567,18 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *tmp, *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
+ LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
+ list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sdev, tmp, &starved_list, starved_entry) {
int flagset;
/*
@@ -588,22 +591,10 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* scsi_request_fn must get the host_lock before checking
* or modifying starved_list or starved_entry.
*/
- sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
- struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
- /*
- * The *queue_ready functions can add a device back onto the
- * starved list's tail, so we must check for a infinite loop.
- */
- if (sdev == starved_head)
+ if (scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
break;
- if (!starved_head)
- starved_head = sdev;
-
- if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
- list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
- &shost->starved_list);
+ if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev)))
continue;
- }
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
@@ -621,6 +612,9 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
}
+
+ /* put any unprocessed entries back */
+ list_splice(&starved_list, &shost->starved_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
blk_run_queue(q);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-07 1:04 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-09 15:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 17:54 ` bugme-daemon
` (14 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-09 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #28 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-09 07:47 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:25 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > The reason for doing it like this is so that if someone slices the loop
> > apart again (which is how this crept in) they won't get a continue or
> > something which allows this to happen.
> >
> > It shouldn't be conditional on the starved list (or anything else)
> > because it's probably a register and should happen at the same point as
> > the list deletion but before we drop the problem lock (because once we
> > drop that lock we'll need to recompute starvation).
> >
> > James
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index f5d3b96..f9a531f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > }
> >
> > list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
> > + starved_entry = NULL;
>
> Should this be starved_head?
>
> > spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
> >
>
> Do you think we can just splice the list like the attached patch (patch
> is example only and is not tested)?
>
> I thought the code is clearer, but I think it may be less efficient. If
> scsi_run_queue is run on multiple processors then with the attached
> patch one processor would splice the list and possibly have to execute
> __blk_run_queue for all the devices on the list serially.
>
> Currently we can at least prep the devices in parallel. One processor
> would grab one entry on the list and drop the host lock, so then another
> processor could grab another entry on the list and start the execution
> process (I wrote start the process because it might turn out that this
> second entry execution might have to wait on the first one when the scsi
> layer has to grab the queue lock again).
I reconsidered: I think something like this would work well if we
simply to run through the starved list once each time, giving them the
chance of executing. Something like this.
James
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..979e07a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -567,15 +567,18 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host
*shost)
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *tmp, *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
+ LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
{
+ list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sdev, tmp, &starved_list, starved_entry) {
int flagset;
/*
@@ -588,22 +591,10 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* scsi_request_fn must get the host_lock before checking
* or modifying starved_list or starved_entry.
*/
- sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
- struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
- /*
- * The *queue_ready functions can add a device back onto the
- * starved list's tail, so we must check for a infinite loop.
- */
- if (sdev == starved_head)
+ if (scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
break;
- if (!starved_head)
- starved_head = sdev;
-
- if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
- list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
- &shost->starved_list);
+ if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev)))
continue;
- }
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
@@ -621,6 +612,9 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
}
+
+ /* put any unprocessed entries back */
+ list_splice(&starved_list, &shost->starved_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
blk_run_queue(q);
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-09 15:47 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-09 17:54 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 19:01 ` bugme-daemon
` (13 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-09 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #29 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-11-09 09:54 -------
Notify-Also : Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-09 17:53 2.6.28-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-09 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-09 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
@ 2008-11-09 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-09 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-09 17:54 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-09 19:01 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 19:15 ` bugme-daemon
` (12 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-09 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
rjw@sisk.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
------- Comment #30 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-11-09 11:01 -------
*** Bug 11990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-09 19:01 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-09 19:15 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-10 2:15 ` bugme-daemon
` (11 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-09 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #31 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-11-09 11:15 -------
First-Bad-Commit : f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-09 19:15 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-10 2:15 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 11:23 ` bugme-daemon
` (10 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-10 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #32 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-11-09 18:15 -------
the comment #28 patch works on my scsi devices!
but seems copy&paster this patch from the website is hard to be patched in
kernel source directly. seems some strange char was inducted into patch that
make "patch -p1" get a regect.
patching file drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 567.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 591.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 612.
Seems the attached patch works better.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-10 2:15 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-11 11:23 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 11:28 ` bugme-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-11 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #33 from vandrove@vc.cvut.cz 2008-11-11 03:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=18799)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18799&action=view)
Kernel NULL pointer dereference with patch from update #28
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-11 11:23 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-11 11:28 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-11 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #34 from vandrove@vc.cvut.cz 2008-11-11 03:28 -------
Two news, both bad.
First bad news is that I tried kernel (yesterday's git) with patch from #28,
and on 4 runs I twice got kernel crash I attached, once system hung during test
for no aparent reason, and one run completed.
Second bad news is that one run which completed took twice as long when
compared to test with Jens's patches to SATA reverted (4x 50MBps vs. 4x
24MBps). But that probably deserves separate bug once crashes are fixed - with
2.6.27-rc1 during my test (write 4GB concurrently to all devices) all 4 leds
for devices behind PMP are on. With current git and patch above almost always
only one led is lit, usually for 2-3 seconds, then bandwidth shifts to another
drive - as drives have 60MBps speed while sata has 300MBps, no surprise it is
slower when commands are not interleaved...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-09 15:47 ` James Bottomley
@ 2008-11-11 18:22 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-11 19:42 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2008-11-11 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: bugme-daemon, linux-scsi
James Bottomley wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f5d3b96..979e07a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -567,15 +567,18 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> */
> static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> - struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
> + struct scsi_device *tmp, *sdev = q->queuedata;
> struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
> + LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
> scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
> + list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(sdev, tmp, &starved_list, starved_entry) {
> int flagset;
>
I do not think we can use list_for_each_entry_safe. It might be he cause
of the oops in the other mail. If we use list_for_each_entry_safe here,
but then some other process like the kernel block workueue calls the
request_fn of a device on the starved list then we can go from
scsi_request_fn -> scsi_host_queue_ready which can do:
/* We're OK to process the command, so we can't be starved */
if (!list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry))
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
and that can end up removing the sdev from scsi_run_queue's spliced
starved list. And so if the kblock workqueue did this to multiple
devices while scsi_run_queue has dropped the host lock then I do not
think list_for_each_entry_safe can handle that.
I can sort of replicate this now. Let me do some testing on the changes
and I will submit something in a minute.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-11 11:28 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-11 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 19:43 ` bugme-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-11 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #35 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-11 10:23 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
James Bottomley wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f5d3b96..979e07a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -567,15 +567,18 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> */
> static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> - struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
> + struct scsi_device *tmp, *sdev = q->queuedata;
> struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
> + LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
> scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
> + list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(sdev, tmp, &starved_list, starved_entry) {
> int flagset;
>
I do not think we can use list_for_each_entry_safe. It might be he cause
of the oops in the other mail. If we use list_for_each_entry_safe here,
but then some other process like the kernel block workueue calls the
request_fn of a device on the starved list then we can go from
scsi_request_fn -> scsi_host_queue_ready which can do:
/* We're OK to process the command, so we can't be starved */
if (!list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry))
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
and that can end up removing the sdev from scsi_run_queue's spliced
starved list. And so if the kblock workqueue did this to multiple
devices while scsi_run_queue has dropped the host lock then I do not
think list_for_each_entry_safe can handle that.
I can sort of replicate this now. Let me do some testing on the changes
and I will submit something in a minute.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-11 18:22 ` Mike Christie
@ 2008-11-11 19:42 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2008-11-11 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: bugme-daemon, linux-scsi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 270 bytes --]
Mike Christie wrote:
> I can sort of replicate this now. Let me do some testing on the changes
> and I will submit something in a minute.
I do not think I am replicating the original problem. The attached patch
should fix the oops in James's splice use patch though.
[-- Attachment #2: splice2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2157 bytes --]
Close possible infinite loop when devices are added back to the
starved list.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..fa45a1a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -567,15 +567,18 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
+ LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost)) {
+ list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
+
+ while (!list_empty(&starved_list)) {
int flagset;
/*
@@ -588,24 +591,18 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* scsi_request_fn must get the host_lock before checking
* or modifying starved_list or starved_entry.
*/
- sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
- struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
- /*
- * The *queue_ready functions can add a device back onto the
- * starved list's tail, so we must check for a infinite loop.
- */
- if (sdev == starved_head)
+ if (scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
break;
- if (!starved_head)
- starved_head = sdev;
+ sdev = list_entry(starved_list.next,
+ struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
+ list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
&shost->starved_list);
continue;
}
- list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
@@ -621,6 +618,8 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
}
+ /* put any unprocessed entries back */
+ list_splice(&starved_list, &shost->starved_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
blk_run_queue(q);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-11 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-11 19:43 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-12 10:47 ` bugme-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-11 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #36 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-11 11:43 -------
Reply-To: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu
Mike Christie wrote:
> I can sort of replicate this now. Let me do some testing on the changes
> and I will submit something in a minute.
I do not think I am replicating the original problem. The attached patch
should fix the oops in James's splice use patch though.
Close possible infinite loop when devices are added back to the
starved list.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index f5d3b96..fa45a1a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -567,15 +567,18 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host
*shost)
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *starved_head = NULL, *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
+ LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun)
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list) && !scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
{
+ list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
+
+ while (!list_empty(&starved_list)) {
int flagset;
/*
@@ -588,24 +591,18 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
* scsi_request_fn must get the host_lock before checking
* or modifying starved_list or starved_entry.
*/
- sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
- struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
- /*
- * The *queue_ready functions can add a device back onto the
- * starved list's tail, so we must check for a infinite loop.
- */
- if (sdev == starved_head)
+ if (scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
break;
- if (!starved_head)
- starved_head = sdev;
+ sdev = list_entry(starved_list.next,
+ struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
+ list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
&shost->starved_list);
continue;
}
- list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
@@ -621,6 +618,8 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
}
+ /* put any unprocessed entries back */
+ list_splice(&starved_list, &shost->starved_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
blk_run_queue(q);
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-11 19:43 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-12 10:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-14 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-14 15:41 ` bugme-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 1 reply; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-12 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #37 from vandrove@vc.cvut.cz 2008-11-12 02:47 -------
Patch from #36 fixes hangs & crashes. Thanks.
So only remaining problem (for me...) is that with default setup I'm now
getting only 50% of throughput I was getting with 2.6.27 - I can get ~40% back
by limiting disks to 8 requests (so 31 per SATA controller is not hit that
frequently), at the cost of making random I/O much worse... Here are
sequential write data (dd if=/dev/zero of=/xxx) - with default setting ~25MBps
* 4, with restricting disks to 8 commands ~39MBps * 4. 2.6.27 gets ~47MBps *
4, and 2.6.27 with sata_sil24 patch to increase PCIe read length gets ~51MBps *
4 (which is present in current git tree tested here).
Default setting:
gwy:~# ./x.sh
4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 110.417 s, 38.0 MB/s
gwy:~# 4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 155.827 s, 26.9 MB/s
4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 206.971 s, 20.3 MB/s
4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 206.301 s, 20.3 MB/s
Only 8 requests per drive; there are 4 drives sharing one tag map with 31
entries:
gwy:~# for a in /sys/block/*/queue/nr_requests; do echo 8 > $a; done
gwy:~# ./x.sh
4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 103.588 s, 40.5 MB/s
gwy:~# 4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 110.86 s, 37.8 MB/s
4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 105.978 s, 39.6 MB/s
4000+0 records in
4000+0 records out
4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 107.94 s, 38.9 MB/s
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-12 10:47 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-14 15:40 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-11-14 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugme-daemon; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 02:47 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #37 from vandrove@vc.cvut.cz 2008-11-12 02:47 -------
> Patch from #36 fixes hangs & crashes. Thanks.
Great, thanks!
> So only remaining problem (for me...) is that with default setup I'm now
> getting only 50% of throughput I was getting with 2.6.27 - I can get ~40% back
> by limiting disks to 8 requests (so 31 per SATA controller is not hit that
> frequently), at the cost of making random I/O much worse... Here are
> sequential write data (dd if=/dev/zero of=/xxx) - with default setting ~25MBps
> * 4, with restricting disks to 8 commands ~39MBps * 4. 2.6.27 gets ~47MBps *
> 4, and 2.6.27 with sata_sil24 patch to increase PCIe read length gets ~51MBps *
> 4 (which is present in current git tree tested here).
>
> Default setting:
>
> gwy:~# ./x.sh
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 110.417 s, 38.0 MB/s
> gwy:~# 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 155.827 s, 26.9 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 206.971 s, 20.3 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 206.301 s, 20.3 MB/s
>
> Only 8 requests per drive; there are 4 drives sharing one tag map with 31
> entries:
>
> gwy:~# for a in /sys/block/*/queue/nr_requests; do echo 8 > $a; done
> gwy:~# ./x.sh
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 103.588 s, 40.5 MB/s
> gwy:~# 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 110.86 s, 37.8 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 105.978 s, 39.6 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 107.94 s, 38.9 MB/s
Um, you might want to report this one separately. I'd suggest to both
the IDE and SCSI lists:
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Appending it to a bug report we're getting ready to close is a sure way
of losing the information.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (38 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-12 10:47 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-14 15:41 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-16 17:17 ` bugme-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-14 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #38 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-11-14 07:41 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 02:47 -0800, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #37 from vandrove@vc.cvut.cz 2008-11-12 02:47 -------
> Patch from #36 fixes hangs & crashes. Thanks.
Great, thanks!
> So only remaining problem (for me...) is that with default setup I'm now
> getting only 50% of throughput I was getting with 2.6.27 - I can get ~40% back
> by limiting disks to 8 requests (so 31 per SATA controller is not hit that
> frequently), at the cost of making random I/O much worse... Here are
> sequential write data (dd if=/dev/zero of=/xxx) - with default setting ~25MBps
> * 4, with restricting disks to 8 commands ~39MBps * 4. 2.6.27 gets ~47MBps *
> 4, and 2.6.27 with sata_sil24 patch to increase PCIe read length gets ~51MBps *
> 4 (which is present in current git tree tested here).
>
> Default setting:
>
> gwy:~# ./x.sh
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 110.417 s, 38.0 MB/s
> gwy:~# 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 155.827 s, 26.9 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 206.971 s, 20.3 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 206.301 s, 20.3 MB/s
>
> Only 8 requests per drive; there are 4 drives sharing one tag map with 31
> entries:
>
> gwy:~# for a in /sys/block/*/queue/nr_requests; do echo 8 > $a; done
> gwy:~# ./x.sh
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 103.588 s, 40.5 MB/s
> gwy:~# 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 110.86 s, 37.8 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 105.978 s, 39.6 MB/s
> 4000+0 records in
> 4000+0 records out
> 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 107.94 s, 38.9 MB/s
Um, you might want to report this one separately. I'd suggest to both
the IDE and SCSI lists:
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Appending it to a bug report we're getting ready to close is a sure way
of losing the information.
James
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-16 16:24 2.6.28-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-16 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-16 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Mike Christie <michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
@ 2008-11-16 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-16 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (39 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-14 15:41 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-16 17:17 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-19 1:49 ` bugme-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-16 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #39 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-11-16 09:17 -------
Handled-By : Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (40 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-16 17:17 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-11-19 1:49 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-02 7:20 ` bugme-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-11-19 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #40 from yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com 2008-11-18 17:49 -------
James,
Would you like to push the new patch to 2.6.28-rc6? My machines still hang with
2.6.28-rc5.
Thanks,
Yanmin
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-11-22 20:24 2.6.28-rc6-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-22 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-22 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (24 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Mike Christie <michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
@ 2008-11-22 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-22 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (24 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (41 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-19 1:49 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-02 7:20 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-07 21:52 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-13 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-02 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #41 from alex.shi@intel.com 2008-12-01 23:20 -------
seems the 2.6.28-rc7 kernel still hang due to this bug. we will appreciate if
the patch can be added into upstream kernel. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-12-03 21:49 2.6.28-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-12-03 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-03 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (35 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Mike Christie <michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
@ 2008-12-03 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-03 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Mike Christie,
Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (35 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-12-07 20:27 2.6.28-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-12-07 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-07 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Linux SCSI list,
Mike Christie, Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (39 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Mike Christie <michaelc-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
@ 2008-12-07 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-07 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, alexs, James Bottomley, Linux SCSI list,
Mike Christie, Yanmin Zhang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
Subject : mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
Submitter : alexs <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2008-10-30 01:17 (39 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f0c0a376d0fcd4c5579ecf5e95f88387cba85211
Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c28
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898#c36
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (42 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-02 7:20 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-07 21:52 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-13 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-07 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
------- Comment #42 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-12-07 13:52 -------
Notify-Also : Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
* [Bug 11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device.
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
` (43 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-07 21:52 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-12-13 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
44 siblings, 0 replies; 176+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-12-13 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11898
rjw@sisk.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |CODE_FIX
------- Comment #43 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-12-13 10:23 -------
Fixed by commit 2a3a59e5c977654d3aad5bc11cc0aca2303a7f44 .
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 176+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-13 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 176+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-02 16:04 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:04 ` [Bug #11798] [Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP] DRI fail on recent kernel updates Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` [Bug #11806] iwl3945 fails with microcode error Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-04 22:33 ` reinette chatre
2008-11-04 22:33 ` reinette chatre
2008-11-02 16:06 ` [Bug #11824] raw1394: possible deadlock if accessed by multithreaded app Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 19:14 ` Stefan Richter
2008-11-02 19:14 ` Stefan Richter
2008-11-02 16:06 ` [Bug #11799] xorg can not start up with stolen memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` [Bug #11822] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0858): _SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BIF: Return Package type mismatch at index 9 - found Buffer, expected String [20080926] Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` [Bug #11826] extreme slowness of IO stuff using 2.6.28-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11834] iwl3945: if I leave my machine running overnight, wifi will not work in the morning Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11841] plenty of line "ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode" in dmesg Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11845] Suspend regression on Lenovo x60 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 22:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-11-02 22:07 ` Carlos R. Mafra
[not found] ` <20081102220758.GA14374-bi+AKbBUZKZ4FcnNp22f3nqWYbMAw+HU@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-02 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 23:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200811030055.22645.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-03 9:04 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-11-03 9:04 ` Tomas Winkler
[not found] ` <1ba2fa240811030104w3ebc3acfs2e1a135457a1bade-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-03 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-03 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11852] v2.6.28-rc1: Regression in ext3/jbd Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:18 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-11-02 21:18 ` Vegard Nossum
[not found] ` <19f34abd0811021318k22ee25edgdb896ffc9037031e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-02 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11847] 2.6.28-rc1 fails building on allnoconfig Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11849] default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11873] unable to mount ext3 root filesystem due to htree_dirblock_to_tree Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11856] seq_file does not handle pread() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11854] v2.6.28-rc1: readlink /proc/*/exe returns uninitialized data to userspace Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:09 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-11-02 21:09 ` Vegard Nossum
[not found] ` <19f34abd0811021309u341b0512x2220720176011e78-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-02 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11858] Timeout regression introduced by 242f9dcb8ba6f68fcd217a119a7648a4f69290e9 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11875] radeonfb lockup in .28-rc (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11881] Linux 2.6.28-rc2 i/o error on /dev/ttyUSB0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11882] dbench 15% regression with 2.6.28-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11895] 2.6.28-rc2 regression: keyboard dead after reboot on Toshiba Portege 4000 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11894] 2.6.28-rc2 / hso driver oops Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 12:25 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-11-03 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11891] resume from disk broken on hp/compaq nx7000 (DRM problem) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11903] regression: vmalloc easily fail Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11899] sometime boot failed on T61 laptop Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11901] ath5k triggers WARN_ON in __ieee80211_rx Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 19:24 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11909] initrd fails to create bloc devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11905] lots of extra timer interrupts costing 2W Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:28 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-02 21:28 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11908] linux-2.6.28-rc2 regression : oprofile doesnt work anymore Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11906] 2.6.28-rc2 seems to fail at powering down the monitor when it should Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11917] Asus Eee PC hotkeys stop working after prolonged usage Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11910] System doesn't restart Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11911] new PCMCIA device instance after resume - orinoco can't download firmware Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11913] USB/INPUT: slab error in cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(): double free? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11927] undefined reference to `save_stack_trace' Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11928] ath5k gets lost with eeepc-laptop removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11925] cdrom: missing compat ioctls Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11937] ext3 __log_wait_for_space: no transactions Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:26 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-02 21:26 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-02 16:07 ` [Bug #11940] Unable to handle kernel paging request at iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:04 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20081102.130409.86443785.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-02 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-07 20:27 2.6.28-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:32 ` [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 21:49 2.6.28-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 21:57 ` [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-22 20:24 2.6.28-rc6-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-22 20:28 ` [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-22 20:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-16 16:24 2.6.28-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-16 16:35 ` [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-16 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-09 17:53 2.6.28-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-09 17:59 ` [Bug #11898] mke2fs hang on AIC79 device Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-09 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-30 8:17 [Bug 11898] New: " bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 8:53 ` [Bug 11898] " bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 8:54 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 10:23 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 12:37 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-30 14:06 ` bugme-daemon
2008-10-31 3:12 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-03 8:02 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-04 7:37 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-04 7:41 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-04 9:05 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 1:32 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 1:55 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 2:10 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-05 1:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 2:11 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 2:43 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 2:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 3:19 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 4:01 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-05 17:25 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-09 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-11 18:22 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-11 19:42 ` Mike Christie
2008-11-05 4:26 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 10:48 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 14:32 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 15:25 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 17:25 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-05 18:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 1:44 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 1:59 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 2:06 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 2:19 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-06 14:57 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-06 14:58 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-07 1:04 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 15:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 17:54 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 19:01 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-09 19:15 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-10 2:15 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 11:23 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 11:28 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-11 19:43 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-12 10:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-14 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-14 15:41 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-16 17:17 ` bugme-daemon
2008-11-19 1:49 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-02 7:20 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-07 21:52 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-13 18:23 ` bugme-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.