From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Shaun Tancheff <shaun@tancheff.com>,
"linux-block\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: 512e ZBC host-managed disks
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:02:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49eg08codc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112082048.GA8276@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:20:48 +0100")
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:13:52PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> (3) Any other idea ?
>
> Do nothing and ignore the problem. This whole idea so braindead that
> the person coming up with the T10 language should be shot. Either a device
> has 511 logical sectors or 4k but not this crazy mix.
>
> And make sure no one ships such a piece of crap because we are hell
> not going to support it.
Agreed. This is insane.
-Jeff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Shaun Tancheff <shaun@tancheff.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: 512e ZBC host-managed disks
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:02:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49eg08codc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112082048.GA8276@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:20:48 +0100")
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:13:52PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> (3) Any other idea ?
>
> Do nothing and ignore the problem. This whole idea so braindead that
> the person coming up with the T10 language should be shot. Either a device
> has 511 logical sectors or 4k but not this crazy mix.
>
> And make sure no one ships such a piece of crap because we are hell
> not going to support it.
Agreed. This is insane.
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 8:13 RFC: 512e ZBC host-managed disks Damien Le Moal
2017-01-12 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-12 15:02 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2017-01-12 15:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-01-13 0:14 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49eg08codc.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=shaun@tancheff.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.