Re: [PATCH v4] i18n: notes: mark comment for translation

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> writes:

> Mark comment displayed when editing a note for translation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>
> ---
>
> This patch follows the original output and Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> sugestion to remove \n from the source string in order to assure that the
> ouput layout is not change by one translator forgetting to add \n, for
> instance.

Well, that cuts both ways.  A translater adding an extra \n would
also break the layout, so I am not convinced that is a very good
justification.

As a parameter to strbuf_add_commented_lines(), an extra or a
missing \n does not really matter, though, because the whole thing
is a line-oriented comment ;-)

As to the patch text, it looks like it would produce more correct
output than what I queued tentatively on 'pu', so I'd replace it
with this one.

>  builtin/notes.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/notes.c b/builtin/notes.c
> index 0572051..f848b89 100644
> --- a/builtin/notes.c
> +++ b/builtin/notes.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static const char * const git_notes_get_ref_usage[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const char note_template[] =
> -	"\nWrite/edit the notes for the following object:\n";
> +	N_("Write/edit the notes for the following object:");
>  
>  struct note_data {
>  	int given;
> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ static void prepare_note_data(const unsigned char *object, struct note_data *d,
>  			copy_obj_to_fd(fd, old_note);
>  
>  		strbuf_addch(&buf, '\n');
> -		strbuf_add_commented_lines(&buf, note_template, strlen(note_template));
> +		strbuf_add_commented_lines(&buf, "\n", strlen("\n"));
> +		strbuf_add_commented_lines(&buf, _(note_template), strlen(_(note_template)));
>  		strbuf_addch(&buf, '\n');
>  		write_or_die(fd, buf.buf, buf.len);