All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
	stolee@gmail.com,  phillip.wood123@gmail.com,  me@ttaylorr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:18:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7c982aoi.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqikss2b7l.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:07:10 +0900")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:
>
>> diff --git a/t/t3400-rebase.sh b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
>> index 09f230eefb2..f61a717b190 100755
>> --- a/t/t3400-rebase.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
>> @@ -456,4 +456,20 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase when inside worktree subdirectory' '
>>  	)
>>  '
>>  
>> +test_expect_success 'git rebase --update-ref with core.commentChar and branch on worktree' '
>> +	test_when_finished git branch -D base topic2 &&
>> +	test_when_finished git checkout main &&
>> +	test_when_finished git branch -D wt-topic &&
>> +	test_when_finished git worktree remove wt-topic &&
>> +	git checkout main &&
>> +	git checkout -b base &&
>> +	git checkout -b topic2 &&
>> +	test_commit msg2 &&
>> +	git worktree add wt-topic &&
>> +	git checkout base &&
>> +	test_commit msg3 &&
>> +	git checkout topic2 &&
>> +	git -c core.commentChar=% rebase --update-refs base
>> +'
>
> Can we improve this test a bit to give it more visibility into the
> breakage?
>
> I am sure that the internal machinery gets confused because it wants
> to skip commented out lines assuming '%' is used for comments, and
> fails to skip lines that are commented with '#', but it is a bit too
> opaque how this would break without the fix.  Perhaps add a line or
> two of a comment to the test to describe what the expected mode of
> failure is?

Something like "a line commented-out with '#' in the list of
instructions used internally by "rebase" is not recognised as a
comment and you'd get an error that says '#' is not a valid
instruction", perhaps.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-13  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-23 17:27 [PATCH] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-10-23 18:44 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 19:53   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30     ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 17:25       ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 20:30         ` phillip.wood123
2024-10-31  9:58   ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 10:07     ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30       ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-23 20:43 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 20:51   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13  1:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13  1:18       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-11-13 14:47       ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 22:57         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:02         ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13  1:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:48       ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 23:00         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-12 10:20   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13  1:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:49       ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-24 19:58         ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-13  0:26   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:01     ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56   ` [PATCH v3 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 10:07     ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 10:52       ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-25 14:36         ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 20:13     ` [PATCH v4 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13       ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13       ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13       ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-26  1:11       ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-26 11:24         ` Phillip Wood
2024-11-27 12:39           ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq7c982aoi.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.