From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: phillip.wood123@gmail.com
Cc: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
stolee@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:00:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqv7wq91sn.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c623fcf-01dd-4056-80c1-b3c860ab7f87@gmail.com> (phillip's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:48:59 +0000")
phillip.wood123@gmail.com writes:
>> I guess this fails by leaving the "# *** SAY WHY" in the resulting
>> message, because the stripspace wants to see '%' to start commented
>> out lines to be stripped? If we inspect with this test what the
>> temporary file we give to the editor looks like to make sure that
>> '%' is used for commenting, that would be a more direct test, but
>> without going that far, at least can we have a comment describing
>> how this is expected to fail without the fix?
>
> For me something like
>
> GIT_EDITOR="cat >actual" git -c core.commentChar=% revert \
> --edit --reference HEAD &&
> test_grep "^% \*\*\* SAY WHY WE ARE REVERTING THE COMMIT \*\*\*" \
> actual
>
> Would be a more convincing test as it actually checks that the user sees
> the line that we expect strbuf_stripspace() to remove from the final
> message.
Yes, it is a more direct test. If we did that, that would of course
be preferrable.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 17:27 [PATCH] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-10-23 18:44 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 19:53 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 17:25 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 20:30 ` phillip.wood123
2024-10-31 9:58 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-31 10:07 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-10-31 16:30 ` Phillip Wood
2024-10-23 20:43 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-23 20:51 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:47 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 22:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:02 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:48 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-13 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-11-12 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-13 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-13 14:49 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-24 19:58 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-13 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-24 20:01 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-24 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 10:52 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-11-25 14:36 ` phillip.wood123
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 " kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sequencer: comment checked-out branch properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sequencer: comment `--reference` subject line properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-25 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sequencer: comment commit messages properly kristofferhaugsbakk
2024-11-26 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sequencer: comment out properly in todo list Junio C Hamano
2024-11-26 11:24 ` Phillip Wood
2024-11-27 12:39 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqv7wq91sn.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.