Re: [PATCH] protocol upload-pack-v2

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org> writes:

>> The current protocol has the following problems that limit
>> us:
>> 
>>  - It is not easy to make it resumable, because we
>> recompute every time.  This is especially problematic for
>> the initial fetch aka "clone" as we will be talking about
>> a large transfer. Redirection to a bundle hosted on CDN
>> might be something we could do transparently.
>> 
>>  - The protocol extension has a fairly low length limit.
>> 
>>  - Because the protocol exchange starts by the server side
>> advertising all its refs, even when the fetcher is
>> interested in a single ref, the initial overhead is
>> nontrivial, especially when you are doing a small
>> incremental update.  The worst case is an auto-builder
>> that polls every five minutes, even when there is no new
>> commits to be fetched.
>
> A lot of focus about the problems with ref advertisement is 
> about the obvious problem mentioned above (a bad problem 
> indeed).  I would like to add that there is another related 
> problem that all potential solutions to the above problem do 
> not neccessarily improve.   When polling regularly there is 
> also no current efficient way to check on the current state of 
> all refs.  It would be nice to also be able to get an 
> incremental update on large refs spaces.

Yes, incremental ref update is an important problem to solve.  I
think one potential solution was indeed mentioned to improve that
exact issue, e.g. footnote #3 in $gmane/264000.