From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Jake Goulding <goulding@vivisimo.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Tom Grennan <tmgrennan@gmail.com>,
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tag: Implicitly supply --list given another list-like option
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:00:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa88rw656.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqefy3w6k0.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:51:59 -0800")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> I haven't looked at the patch text of this one closely yet, but I
> think the goals of both make sense, so we would eventually want to
> have them both.
> ...
> So perhaps you would want this applied first, so that existing three
> can already benefit from "implicit --list" before waiting for the
> other one?
Ah, I see that you already have the other topic polished to v4
(sorry, but I am a bit behind the list traffic). If it makes your
life easier, it is OK to make the current three to four by adding
"--no-contains" first and then make all/any of them imply "--list"
on top.
IOW, either is fine. Personally, I have a suspicion that sending
both at the same time, expecting the maintainer to be able to
resolve the potential conflicts correctly, would also be fine ;-)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-12 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-10 10:43 BUG: "git branch --contains <commit> <name>" does nothing, silently fails Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-03-10 12:42 ` Jeff King
2017-03-10 13:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-03-11 12:08 ` [PATCH] tag: Implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-03-11 12:14 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-03-12 2:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-12 3:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-03-12 9:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-03-12 3:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-12 9:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-03-12 11:19 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa88rw656.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=goulding@vivisimo.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=tmgrennan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.