Re: [PATCH 4/5] grep: introduce new config option to include untracked files

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> writes:

>>> +	if (use_index && !cached)
>>> +		git_config_get_bool("grep.includeuntracked", &untracked);
>> Can this ever return an error?  E.g.
>> 	[grep] includeuntracked = "not really"
>
> After a brief inspection of the code in cache.c, git_config_get_bool()
> always returns either 0 or 1, so we should be fine.  Thus, any
> strangeness in a configuration file would end up not enabling
> this option.

If that were the case, then it is not "fine".

When the user triggered an operation which *requires* us to parse
and interpret the meaning of an entry in their configuration file
correctly in order to carry it out, and if that entry has a value
that we do not consider valid, we should notice and complain, before
saying "Nah, this I do not understand, so I'll do one of the two
things I would have done if the value were understandable and would
not tell the user which one I did".

What makes it fine int his case is that git_config_get_bool() dies
when the given value is not a Boolean ;-).  The returned value from
the function can be used to tell if the variable does not exist and
the caller should decide to stuff some default value to &untracked
but in this case you do not need to.