From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "William Sprent via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>,
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
William Sprent <williams@unity3d.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: remove NEED_WORK_TREE flag
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 10:14:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmt4nt8k3.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b231e9beb43e4fac6457b9bf86e4c1db39c4238.1678283349.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (William Sprent via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 08 Mar 2023 13:49:08 +0000")
"William Sprent via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> In preparation for adding a sub-command to 'sparse-checkout' that can be
> run in a bare repository, remove the 'NEED_WORK_TREE' flag from its
> entry in the 'commands' array of 'git.c'.
Given that "sparse-checkout" is about affecting which part of the
directory hierarchies are to be materialized in the working tree,
the idea to add a subcommand that does not require a working tree to
the command by itself smells very iffy, and the changes necessary to
protect the existing commands from the breakage caused by the
decision to drop NEED_WORK_TREE bit, i.e. sprinkling many
setup_work_tree() calls, somehow looks like they are solving a
problem that did not have to get created in the first place.
But you did not find a place the feature you wanted to add with
[2/2] would fit better, perhaps, in which case, somebody else may be
able to suggest an alternative in their reviews of that step,
hopefully.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 13:49 [PATCH 0/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: add check-rules command William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-03-08 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: remove NEED_WORK_TREE flag William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-03-08 18:14 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-08 19:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-09 15:31 ` Elijah Newren
2023-03-09 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-08 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: add check-rules command William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-03-19 4:26 ` Elijah Newren
2023-03-20 15:49 ` William Sprent
2023-03-19 4:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Elijah Newren
2023-03-27 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 " William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-03-27 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: remove NEED_WORK_TREE flag William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-03-27 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-07 16:16 ` SZEDER Gábor
2023-04-07 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-27 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: add check-rules command William Sprent via GitGitGadget
2023-04-01 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Elijah Newren
2023-04-03 17:07 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqmt4nt8k3.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
--cc=williams@unity3d.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.