Re: [PATCH 0/6] unit-tests: add and use TEST_RUN to simplify tests

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:

> The macro TEST only allows defining a test that consists of a single
> expression.  This requires wrapping tests made up of one or more
> statements in a function, which is a small, but avoidable hurdle.  This
> series provides a new macro, TEST_RUN, that provides a way to define
> tests without requiring to declare a function.
>
>   t0080: move expected output to a file
>   unit-tests: add TEST_RUN
>   t-ctype: use TEST_RUN
>   t-reftable-basics: use TEST_RUN
>   t-strvec: use TEST_RUN
>   t-strbuf: use TEST_RUN
>
>  t/helper/test-example-tap.c      |  33 +++
>  t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh      |  48 +----
>  t/t0080/expect                   |  76 +++++++
>  t/unit-tests/t-ctype.c           |   4 +-
>  t/unit-tests/t-reftable-basics.c | 228 +++++++++-----------
>  t/unit-tests/t-strbuf.c          |  79 +++----
>  t/unit-tests/t-strvec.c          | 356 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>  t/unit-tests/test-lib.c          |  42 +++-
>  t/unit-tests/test-lib.h          |   8 +
>  9 files changed, 462 insertions(+), 412 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 t/t0080/expect

So, looking back the discussion list on

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/85b6b8a9-ee5f-42ab-bcbc-49976b30ef33@web.de/

any loose ends still need to be addressed?  I didn't spot any
myself, so I am willing to merge it to 'next' soonish, but please
stop me if there were something I missed.

Thanks.