All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	dsterba@suse.cz, ptesarik@suse.cz, rguenther@suse.de,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:45:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xnbopg8lex.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120201151918.GC16714@quack.suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:19:18 +0100")


Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
>   we've spotted the following mismatch between what kernel folks expect
> from a compiler and what GCC really does, resulting in memory corruption on
> some architectures. Consider the following structure:
> struct x {
>     long a;
>     unsigned int b1;
>     unsigned int b2:1;
> };

If this structure were volatile, you could try
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields, which forces GCC to use the C type to
define the access width, instead of doing whatever it thinks is optimal.

Note: that flag is enabled by default for some targets already, most
notably ARM.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	dsterba@suse.cz, ptesarik@suse.cz, rguenther@suse.de,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Memory corruption due to word sharing
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:45:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xnbopg8lex.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120201151918.GC16714@quack.suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:19:18 +0100")


Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
>   we've spotted the following mismatch between what kernel folks expect
> from a compiler and what GCC really does, resulting in memory corruption on
> some architectures. Consider the following structure:
> struct x {
>     long a;
>     unsigned int b1;
>     unsigned int b2:1;
> };

If this structure were volatile, you could try
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields, which forces GCC to use the C type to
define the access width, instead of doing whatever it thinks is optimal.

Note: that flag is enabled by default for some targets already, most
notably ARM.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-03  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-01 15:19 Memory corruption due to word sharing Jan Kara
2012-02-01 15:19 ` Jan Kara
2012-02-01 15:34 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-02-01 15:34   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-02-01 16:37 ` Colin Walters
2012-02-01 16:37   ` Colin Walters
2012-02-01 16:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 16:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 17:11     ` Jiri Kosina
2012-02-01 17:11       ` Jiri Kosina
2012-02-01 17:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 17:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 17:41       ` Michael Matz
2012-02-01 17:41         ` Michael Matz
2012-02-01 18:09         ` David Miller
2012-02-01 18:09           ` David Miller
2012-02-01 18:45           ` Jeff Law
2012-02-01 18:45             ` Jeff Law
2012-02-01 19:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 19:09               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02 15:51               ` Jeff Garzik
2012-02-02 15:51                 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-02-01 18:57           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 18:57             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 19:04           ` Peter Bergner
2012-02-01 19:04             ` Peter Bergner
2012-02-01 18:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 18:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02  9:35           ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02  9:35             ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02  9:37           ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02  9:37             ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02 13:43           ` Michael Matz
2012-02-02 13:43             ` Michael Matz
2012-02-01 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 16:41   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 17:42   ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 17:42     ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 19:40     ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-02-01 19:40       ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-02-01 20:01       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:16         ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-02-01 20:16           ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-02-01 20:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:44             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02 15:58             ` Aldy Hernandez
2012-02-02 15:58               ` Aldy Hernandez
2012-02-02 16:28               ` Michael Matz
2012-02-02 16:28                 ` Michael Matz
2012-02-02 17:51                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02 17:51                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:19           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02  9:46           ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02  9:46             ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-01 19:44     ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 19:44       ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 19:54       ` Jeff Law
2012-02-01 19:54         ` Jeff Law
2012-02-01 19:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 19:47       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 19:58       ` Alan Cox
2012-02-01 19:58         ` Alan Cox
2012-02-01 20:41       ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 20:41         ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 20:59         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:59           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 21:24           ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 21:24             ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 21:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 21:55               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 21:25           ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 21:25             ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 22:27             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 22:27               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 22:45           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 22:45             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-01 23:11             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 23:11               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02 18:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 18:42                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 19:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02 19:08                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-02 19:37                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-02 19:37                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 16:38                     ` Andrew MacLeod
2012-02-03 16:38                       ` Andrew MacLeod
2012-02-03 17:16                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-03 17:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-03 19:16                         ` Andrew MacLeod
2012-02-03 19:16                           ` Andrew MacLeod
2012-02-03 20:00                           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-03 20:00                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-03 20:19                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-03 20:19                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-06 15:38                             ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-06 15:38                               ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-10 19:27                             ` Richard Henderson
2012-02-10 19:27                               ` Richard Henderson
2012-02-02 11:19           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-02 11:19             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-01 21:04       ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 21:04         ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-02  9:28         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2012-02-02  9:28           ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2012-02-01 17:08 ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 17:08   ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 17:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 17:29     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 20:53     ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 20:53       ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 21:20       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 21:20         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-01 21:37         ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 21:37           ` Torvald Riegel
2012-02-01 22:18           ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 22:18             ` Boehm, Hans
2012-02-01 17:52 ` Dennis Clarke
2012-02-01 17:52   ` Dennis Clarke
2012-02-02 11:11 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2012-02-02 11:11   ` James Courtier-Dutton
2012-02-02 11:24   ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02 11:24     ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02 11:13 ` David Sterba
2012-02-02 11:13   ` David Sterba
2012-02-02 11:23   ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-02 11:23     ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-03  6:45 ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2012-02-03  6:45   ` DJ Delorie
2012-02-03  9:37   ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-03  9:37     ` Richard Guenther
2012-02-03 10:03     ` Matthew Gretton-Dann
2012-02-03 10:03       ` Matthew Gretton-Dann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xnbopg8lex.fsf@greed.delorie.com \
    --to=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.