From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, snitzer@kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, dw@davidwei.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/7] block: check for valid bio while splitting
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 17:23:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq11ppf2bnf.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJzwO9dYeBQAHnCC@kbusch-mbp> (Keith Busch's message of "Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:06:19 -0600")
Hi Keith!
> NVMe wants this check to actually be this:
>
> if ((bv.bv_offset | bv.bv_len) & lim->dma_alignment)
>
> because the dma alignment defines not only the starting address offset,
> but also the length. NVMe's default alignment is 4 bytes.
dma_alignment defines the alignment of the DMA starting address. We
don't have a dedicated queue limit for the transfer length granularity
described by NVMe.
--
Martin K. Petersen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 14:11 [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors Keith Busch
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] block: check for valid bio while splitting Keith Busch
2025-08-10 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-10 15:39 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-10 17:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-13 20:06 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-13 20:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-13 21:01 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-13 23:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-14 1:42 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-13 21:23 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2025-08-13 21:52 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-18 4:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] block: align the bio after building it Keith Busch
2025-08-06 6:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-10 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] block: simplify direct io validity check Keith Busch
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] iomap: " Keith Busch
2025-08-06 6:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] block: remove bdev_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] blk-integrity: use simpler alignment check Keith Busch
2025-08-05 14:11 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-08-06 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-06 3:03 ` [PATCHv2 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors Martin K. Petersen
2025-08-06 14:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-07 23:20 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-11 10:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq11ppf2bnf.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.