From: martin.petersen@oracle.com (Martin K. Petersen)
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] nvme: Set physical block size and optimal I/O size according to NVMe 1.4
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:53:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq15zpa2que.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190610210612.103952-4-bvanassche@acm.org> (Bart Van Assche's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:06:12 -0700")
Bart,
> + nawupf = (1 + ns->ctrl->subsys->awupf) * bs;
> + if (id->nsfeat & (1 << 1))
> + nawupf = (1 + id->nawupf) * bs;
This tripped me up a bit. I would have preferred an else statement and
maybe a clarifying comment to make it obvious whether the value comes
from the controller or the namespace.
Also, unlike awupf, nawupf is not a 0-based value (0 means "use awupf"
and not 1 logical block).
And finally, I think it's confusing that you use nawupf for the variable
name post modification. In terms of naming, I think you'd be better off
to do s/nawupf/phys_bs/ or atomic_bs. And then rename your existing
phys_bs variable to io_min to match the existing block layer usage.
So something like:
/* Use reported namespace write atomicity */
if (id->nsfeat & (1 << 1) && id->nawupf != 0)
phys_bs = id->nawupf * bs;
else /* Fall back to reported controller write atomicity */
phys_bs = (1 + ns->ctrl->subsys->awupf) * bs;
[...]
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 21:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] NVMe 1.4 Identify Namespace Support Bart Van Assche
2019-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] nvme: Introduce NVMe 1.4 Identify Namespace fields in struct nvme_id_ns Bart Van Assche
2019-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] nvmet: Export NVMe namespace attributes Bart Van Assche
2019-06-14 4:42 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-14 15:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-14 17:18 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-14 17:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-14 17:53 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-06-14 23:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nvme: Set physical block size and optimal I/O size according to NVMe 1.4 Bart Van Assche
2019-06-13 1:53 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2019-06-13 17:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-06-13 23:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq15zpa2que.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.