All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dolev Raviv <draviv@codeaurora.org>,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com,
	Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
	Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC V2 07/16] scsi: support well known logical units
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:18:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1fvgpr16q.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140819172251.GA12892@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:22:51 -0500")

>>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:

>> + /*
>> + * put runtime pm reference for well-known logical units,
>> + * drivers are expected to _get_* again during probe.
>> + */
>> + if (scsi_is_wlun(sdev->lun))
>> + scsi_autopm_put_device(sdev);

Christoph> Special casing the well known LUNs here seems wrong.
Christoph> Shouldn't we do this for any devices that don't get a driver
Christoph> attached to them?

That would also be my preference. Relying on WLU for this seems like a
kludge.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-21 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14 13:30 [PATCH/RFC V2 00/16] UFS: Power managment support Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 01/16] scsi: ufs: Allow vendor specific initialization Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 02/16] scsi: ufs: Add regulator enable support Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 03/16] scsi: ufs: Add clock initialization support Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 04/16] scsi: ufs: refactor query descriptor API support Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 05/16] scsi: ufs: improve init sequence Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 06/16] scsi: ufs: Active Power Mode - configuring bActiveICCLevel Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 07/16] scsi: support well known logical units Dolev Raviv
2014-08-19 17:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-21 21:18     ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2014-08-14 13:30 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 08/16] scsi: ufs: introduce well known logical unit in ufs Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 09/16] scsi: sd: Avoid sending medium write commands if device is write protected Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 10/16] scsi: ufs: add UFS power management support Dolev Raviv
2014-08-20  7:20   ` Dong, Chuanxiao
2014-08-21  8:59     ` Dong, Chuanxiao
2014-08-21 13:01       ` hch
2014-09-03 13:04       ` Dolev Raviv
2014-09-03 11:43     ` Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 11/16] scsi: ufs: refactor configuring power mode Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 12/16] scsi: ufs: Add support for clock gating Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 13/16] scsi: ufs: Add freq-table-hz property for UFS device Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 14/16] scsi: ufs: Add support for clock scaling using devfreq framework Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 15/16] scsi: ufs: add capability to control the auto bkops during suspend Dolev Raviv
2014-08-14 13:31 ` [PATCH/RFC V2 16/16] scsi: ufs: definitions for phy interface Dolev Raviv
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-22  0:02 [PATCH/RFC V2 07/16] scsi: support well known logical units subhashj
2014-08-24 20:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25  5:26   ` subhashj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq1fvgpr16q.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
    --to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=draviv@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santoshsy@gmail.com \
    --cc=sthumma@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.