From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without request batching
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:22:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1lful8w8w.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bec80a65-9a8c-54a9-fe70-876fcbe3d592@linux.ibm.com> (Steffen Maier's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:09:50 +0200")
Steffen,
> Martin, is it possible that you re-wrote your for-next and it now no
> longer contains a merged 5.4/scsi-postmerge with those fixes? At
> least I cannot find the fix code in next-20190917 and it fails again
> for me.
Yes, looks like you're right. Not sure how I managed to mess that up. I
must have inadvertently done a reset in the wrong worktree because my
for-next branch maintenance script only does merges.
In any case, since Linus has pulled the block tree dependencies, I'll
rebase the postmerge branch on top of current linus/master and create a
new for-next.
Thanks for the heads-up!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list\:DEVICE-MAPPER \(LVM\)" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without request batching
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:22:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1lful8w8w.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bec80a65-9a8c-54a9-fe70-876fcbe3d592@linux.ibm.com> (Steffen Maier's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:09:50 +0200")
Steffen,
> Martin, is it possible that you re-wrote your for-next and it now no
> longer contains a merged 5.4/scsi-postmerge with those fixes? At
> least I cannot find the fix code in next-20190917 and it fails again
> for me.
Yes, looks like you're right. Not sure how I managed to mess that up. I
must have inadvertently done a reset in the wrong worktree because my
for-next branch maintenance script only does merges.
In any case, since Linus has pulled the block tree dependencies, I'll
rebase the postmerge branch on top of current linus/master and create a
new for-next.
Thanks for the heads-up!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without request batching
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:22:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1lful8w8w.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bec80a65-9a8c-54a9-fe70-876fcbe3d592@linux.ibm.com> (Steffen Maier's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:09:50 +0200")
Steffen,
> Martin, is it possible that you re-wrote your for-next and it now no
> longer contains a merged 5.4/scsi-postmerge with those fixes? At
> least I cannot find the fix code in next-20190917 and it fails again
> for me.
Yes, looks like you're right. Not sure how I managed to mess that up. I
must have inadvertently done a reset in the wrong worktree because my
for-next branch maintenance script only does merges.
In any case, since Linus has pulled the block tree dependencies, I'll
rebase the postmerge branch on top of current linus/master and create a
new for-next.
Thanks for the heads-up!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 14:49 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: core: regression fixes for request batching Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 14:49 ` Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: core: fix missing .cleanup_rq for SCSI hosts without " Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 14:49 ` Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 23:32 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-07 23:32 ` Ming Lei
2019-08-08 2:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-08-08 2:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-08-08 2:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-09-18 15:09 ` Steffen Maier
2019-09-18 15:09 ` Steffen Maier
2019-09-18 15:22 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2019-09-18 15:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-09-18 15:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-09-18 15:32 ` Mark Brown
2019-09-18 15:32 ` Mark Brown
2019-08-08 5:52 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-08 5:52 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-08 5:52 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 1:56 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 1:56 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 1:56 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-07 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: fix dh and multipathing " Steffen Maier
2019-08-07 14:49 ` Steffen Maier
2019-08-08 6:02 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-08 6:02 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-08 6:02 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 9:08 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 9:08 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-09 9:08 ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-07 16:17 ` [PATCH 0/2] scsi: core: regression fixes for " Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-07 16:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-07 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-08-07 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1lful8w8w.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.