Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER
	MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	"Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Timing issues between ALSA and i915 drivers
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:48:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <045cfacd-7a8a-af3c-0f82-325b12cf65da@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Hi,

I could use some feedback on HDMI audio issues exposed during the 4.21 
merge window. By accident (misleading documentation) we ended up 
enabling the Skylake driver instead of the HDaudio legacy, and broke 
audio on a number of Skylake and ApolloLake devices where the HDMI/iDISP 
codec was not detected (bit 2 not set in the codec_mask). Linus' Dell 
XPS13 9350 was the first to be impacted of course...

After debugging a bit, this issue can be resolved by either

a) compiling both SOUND and DRM as built-ins (y instead of m)

b) moving the calls snd_hdac_i915_init() to the probe function instead 
of the worker queue (code at 
https://github.com/plbossart/sound/commits/fix/skl-hdmi)

Both solutions point to timing issues.

During internal reviews I was alerted to the fact that the suggested fix 
essentially reverts patch ab1b732d53c18 ('ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Move 
i915 registration to worker thread') which was introduced to solve DRM 
lockup issues.

In other words, we are at a point where we either have DRM lockups or 
can't detect the HDMI audio codec, none of which are too good.

I don't have the background for the DRM lockup stuff, nor do I 
understand why snd_hdac_i915_init has to be called from a thread 
context. Is this really a requirement?

I also don't get what sort of timing issues would come from an 
initialization. What happens on the i915 side and is there some sort of 
mandatory delay between the completion of the i915_init and issuing a 
snd_hdac_chip_readw(bus, STATESTS) to get the codec masks on the HDaudio 
links?

Thanks for any pointers or comments.

-Pierre


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2019-01-16 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-16 17:48 Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-01-16 19:17 ` Timing issues between ALSA and i915 drivers Takashi Iwai
2019-01-16 23:10   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-17  0:13     ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-17 19:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-17 20:31   ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-17 20:47     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-18  8:08       ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=045cfacd-7a8a-af3c-0f82-325b12cf65da@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox