Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER
	MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Timing issues between ALSA and i915 drivers
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:10:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59d3e789-ac8d-e314-5a96-9b0569129fc9@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hef9ce7iz.wl-tiwai@suse.de>


>> I could use some feedback on HDMI audio issues exposed during the 4.21
>> merge window. By accident (misleading documentation) we ended up
>> enabling the Skylake driver instead of the HDaudio legacy, and broke
>> audio on a number of Skylake and ApolloLake devices where the
>> HDMI/iDISP codec was not detected (bit 2 not set in the
>> codec_mask). Linus' Dell XPS13 9350 was the first to be impacted of
>> course...
>>
>> After debugging a bit, this issue can be resolved by either
>>
>> a) compiling both SOUND and DRM as built-ins (y instead of m)
>>
>> b) moving the calls snd_hdac_i915_init() to the probe function instead
>> of the worker queue (code at
>> https://github.com/plbossart/sound/commits/fix/skl-hdmi)
> This isn't guaranteed to work, as request_module() might be involved,
> I'm afraid.

Sorry, what would be the impact of the request_module? it'd just delay 
the probe on the audio side, no?

And if the request_module failed then HDMI wouldn't be more broken 
anyways...

>
>> Both solutions point to timing issues.
>>
>> During internal reviews I was alerted to the fact that the suggested
>> fix essentially reverts patch ab1b732d53c18 ('ASoC: Intel: Skylake:
>> Move i915 registration to worker thread') which was introduced to
>> solve DRM lockup issues.
>>
>> In other words, we are at a point where we either have DRM lockups or
>> can't detect the HDMI audio codec, none of which are too good.
>>
>> I don't have the background for the DRM lockup stuff, nor do I
>> understand why snd_hdac_i915_init has to be called from a thread
>> context. Is this really a requirement?
>>
>> I also don't get what sort of timing issues would come from an
>> initialization. What happens on the i915 side and is there some sort
>> of mandatory delay between the completion of the i915_init and issuing
>> a snd_hdac_chip_readw(bus, STATESTS) to get the codec masks on the
>> HDaudio links?
> snd_hdac_i915_init() waits for the binding with the i915 audio
> component, so a possible solution would be just to delay the audio
> component registration at the really last stage, like the change
> below.
>
> If this still doesn't work, it'll be more deeply inside, and I have
> little clue for now...

I tried this suggestion and no luck, same error with the iDISP codec not 
exposed.

I added a delay after snd_hdac_i915_init(), doesn't seem to do anything.

One possibility is that this is a side effect of the Skylake driver 
initializing the link twice for some odd reason.

And I still don't get what the motivation for moving this init to a work 
queue was in the first place.

Doesn't seem like an easy one to fix...

>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1577,8 +1577,6 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   	if (IS_GEN5(dev_priv))
>   		intel_gpu_ips_init(dev_priv);
>   
> -	intel_audio_init(dev_priv);
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * Some ports require correctly set-up hpd registers for detection to
>   	 * work properly (leading to ghost connected connector status), e.g. VGA
> @@ -1597,6 +1595,8 @@ static void i915_driver_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   
>   	intel_power_domains_enable(dev_priv);
>   	intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
> +
> +	intel_audio_init(dev_priv);
>   }
>   
>   /**
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-16 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-16 17:48 Timing issues between ALSA and i915 drivers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-16 19:17 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-16 23:10   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-01-17  0:13     ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-17 19:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-17 20:31   ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-17 20:47     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-18  8:08       ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59d3e789-ac8d-e314-5a96-9b0569129fc9@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox