From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: topology: Add topology core
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:45:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432824309.2726.44.camel@loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150527194827.GP21577@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 20:48 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:23:03PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> > Ideally we'd turn the dependency chain the other way around and have a
> > snd_soc_dobj_widget struct which inherits snd_soc_dapm_widget and
> > snd_soc_dobj. In the dobj callbacks you can then still use container_of to
> > get it. This comes at the expense that we have to add a free() callback to
> > snd_soc_dapm_widget. But it opens up the possibility to have other
> > specialized widgets sub-classes. snd_soc_dapm_widget is already rather large
> > given how many instance we have of it and quite a few of the fields are only
> > used by a particular type of widget. Another good candidate for example
> > would be the DAI link widget with all its params fields.
>
> Yeah, I was thinking something along those lines might be good long term
> but it's definitely a separate thing to getting the topology stuff in
> and I started worrying about things like multiple inheritance.
Yeah this would also help in reducing memory footprint. Probably a topic
for the audio mini conf ?
Liam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-25 17:22 [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: topology: Add topology UAPI header Liam Girdwood
2015-05-25 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: topology: Add topology core Liam Girdwood
2015-05-27 19:00 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-27 19:23 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-05-27 19:48 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-28 14:45 ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2015-05-28 15:23 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-28 14:33 ` Liam Girdwood
2015-05-29 5:57 ` Vinod Koul
2015-05-25 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ALSA: topology: Export ID types for TLV controls Liam Girdwood
2015-05-28 14:47 ` Liam Girdwood
2015-05-28 14:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-05-26 10:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: topology: Add topology UAPI header Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432824309.2726.44.camel@loki \
--to=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox