From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
To: "Lopez Cruz, Misael" <x0052729@ti.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: Add GPIO support for jack reporting interface
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:38:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090302113845.GA19744@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2C7D3DF36ADFFC479B44490D912B616705ECC77374@dlee07.ent.ti.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:54:36PM -0600, Lopez Cruz, Misael wrote:
> detection/report. There can be a generic detection/report function
> for gpio, I was thinking in something like:
Yes, that's more or less much what I was looking for.
> > Some systems won't be able to use their speaker output while a
> > headphone is connected and so will want to make sure to update
> > both speaker and headphone when the headphone jack status
> > changes.
> Having a single/generic report function like shown above (as is) we
> can't handle that case.
Sure it can - remember that the DAPM updates are done separately to the
detection and can be set to invert the status reported for the power.
The speaker won't be visible as a jack in a situation like this.
> Could we leave the actual implementation of this report function to
> the machine driver? Since the things being done in detection function
> are common (even if other status are wanted to be updated), then
> probably machine driver could define a specific function ("action")
> for doing extra tasks, it can be called from generic gpio detect
> function. Could it be a valid approach?
That sounds like adding a callback for power updates on the jack itself
to me (which isn't a bad idea), rather than changing the report function
of the jack detection method. The need for machine-specific extra
actions probably isn't specific to jacks that are detected via GPIOs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-02 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 7:57 [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: Add GPIO support for jack reporting interface Lopez Cruz, Misael
2009-02-26 11:52 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2009-02-27 10:52 ` Lopez Cruz, Misael
2009-02-27 13:05 ` Mark Brown
2009-03-02 1:54 ` Lopez Cruz, Misael
2009-03-02 11:38 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2009-03-02 21:16 ` Lopez Cruz, Misael
2009-03-02 22:55 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2009-03-03 0:03 ` Lopez Cruz, Misael
2009-03-03 0:43 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2009-03-03 0:47 ` Lopez Cruz, Misael
2009-02-26 18:52 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090302113845.GA19744@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x0052729@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox