From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Miguel Aguilar <miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com>
Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com,
clark.becker@ridgerun.com, santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com,
diego.dompe@ridgerun.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
nsnehaprabha@ti.com, todd.fischer@ridgerun.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Davinci: DM365: Enable DaVinci Voice Codec support for DM365 EVM
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:21:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111162101.GA26771@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4B4987.1080507@ridgerun.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:53:43AM -0600, Miguel Aguilar wrote:
> Do you think that I still using the approach of having both codecs
> registered in the same kernel? or should I get back to the initial
> approach of selecting the wanted codec from the configuration menu?
I certainly think that this is the best approach at least up until the
machine driver in sound/soc/davinci. At that point we're currently
going to be forced to make a decision, though for reference boards with
both hooked up it'd be much better to make this a runtime decision.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-07 22:17 [PATCH 2/2] Davinci: DM365: Enable DaVinci Voice Codec support for DM365 EVM miguel.aguilar
2010-01-08 11:31 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-08 17:36 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-08 19:37 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 15:11 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-11 15:34 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 15:53 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-11 16:21 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-01-19 20:47 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-19 22:10 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-20 14:32 ` Miguel Aguilar
2010-01-20 15:01 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 16:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-11 16:08 ` Miguel Aguilar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100111162101.GA26771@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=clark.becker@ridgerun.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=diego.dompe@ridgerun.com \
--cc=miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com \
--cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
--cc=santiago.nunez@ridgerun.com \
--cc=todd.fischer@ridgerun.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox