From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: omap-abe-twl6040: No need to register DMIC routes seperatly
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:09:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310120926.GE28112@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531DA21D.5080402@metafoo.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:29:33PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 12:05 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >The only driver that I can think of which did anything like what you
> >describe was smdk-wm8580 and that was still only using one component,
> >it's just that Jassi preferred to split the input and output paths since
> >the DAIs were separate on the CODEC and he felt that was clearer. It
> >didn't make any practical difference, it certainly wasn't due to startup
> >ordering.
> Take a look at e.g. omap/rx51.c it's doing what I'm describing and I
> presume it does this for the reasons I described.
Oh, rx51 is just generally fun - I'd be a bit surprised if it still
works. It's actually the out of ASoC probe stuff that's causing
problems there, it was trying to do multi-component prior that being
supported.
> But it doesn't really matter. The important thing about this series
> is that card level DAPM elements and controls should be registered
> with the card not the CODEC and I think we can agree on that one.
Right, it's mostly just an alarm bell for review (I'd not looked at the
series yet, I tend to defer things until the people working on the
driver have had a chance to look).
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-08 18:16 [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: omap-abe-twl6040: No need to register DMIC routes seperatly Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-08 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: rx51: Convert to table based control and DAPM setup Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-08 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: omap3pandora: Convert to table based " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-10 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: omap-abe-twl6040: No need to register DMIC routes seperatly Peter Ujfalusi
2014-03-10 8:18 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-10 9:12 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-10 9:24 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-10 10:10 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-10 10:27 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-10 11:05 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-10 11:29 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-10 12:09 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140310120926.GE28112@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox