Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: omap-abe-twl6040: No need to register DMIC routes seperatly

[Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>]

On 03/10/2014 09:13 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/08/2014 08:16 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> When using table based DAPM setup there is no need to register DAPM elements for
>> different sub-components separately. The widgets will be registered before the
>> first sub-component is initialized, the routes are only added after the last
>> sub-component has been initialized, meaning everything will be available when it
>> is needed.
>
> The reason why we add the DMIC routes in the way we do is that not all boards
> have DMIC in use. PandaBoards does not have DMIC while SDP/Blaze have. On
> PandaBoard we do not register the dmic dai link so the widgets are not going
> to be added and also the dmic DAI and codec will be not loaded on PandaBoards.
> I think this will cause some warning because of missing "DMic" widget?
>

Hm, ok, missed that part. Makes sense. I'll respin the patch to just use the 
card's DAPM context when registering the DMIC DAPM routes.

- Lars