From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ak4642: show error if register write fails
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:21:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311142138.GU28112@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531F16DB.30200@metafoo.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1033 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:59:55PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 12:21 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>If you think that changing the two snd_soc calls to print errors
> >>when anything bad happens then that would also be a good idea then
> >>I can send a patch for that.
> >That would be better, yes.
> In my opinion it's better to pass the error on to the upper levels.
> E.g. if userspace opens the PCM device and there is an IO error in
> the startup callback then that error should be passed on to the
> userspace application rather than doing a out of band error
> reporting and adding a entry to the kernel log.
It would, overall, be much better to be passing errors back. However
what's actually happening now is I/O errors are routinely ignored and
our error handling is somewhat shaky (and realistically it's hard to
know what to do a lot of the time when I/O with the device is failing).
Given that improving the diagnostics seems like it's going in the right
direction, we can always remove this later.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 18:15 [PATCH] ak4642: show error if register write fails Ben Dooks
2014-03-10 23:40 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 11:18 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-11 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 13:59 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-11 14:17 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-11 14:20 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-11 14:21 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-03-11 15:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-03-11 18:44 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140311142138.GU28112@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox