From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ak4642: show error if register write fails
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:17:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531F1ADE.3000409@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531F16DB.30200@metafoo.de>
On 11/03/14 13:59, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 12:21 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:18:30AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>> On 10/03/14 23:40, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>>> Two things here. One is that this should be a dev_err() and the other
>>>> is that if this is worth doing shouldn't it just be in the core - I see
>>>> nothing driver specific here?
>>
>>> Sorry, didn't see a device in "struct snd_soc_codec *codec" so I went
>>> for a printk (although it was pr_info instead of pr_err).
>>
>> codec->dev.
>>
>>> If you think that changing the two snd_soc calls to print errors
>>> when anything bad happens then that would also be a good idea then
>>> I can send a patch for that.
>>
>> That would be better, yes.
>
> In my opinion it's better to pass the error on to the upper levels. E.g.
> if userspace opens the PCM device and there is an IO error in the
> startup callback then that error should be passed on to the userspace
> application rather than doing a out of band error reporting and adding a
> entry to the kernel log.
From a grep, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of error
checking in a number of the codec drivers.
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 18:15 [PATCH] ak4642: show error if register write fails Ben Dooks
2014-03-10 23:40 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 11:18 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-11 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 13:59 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-11 14:17 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2014-03-11 14:20 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-03-11 14:21 ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-03-11 18:44 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531F1ADE.3000409@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox