From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Kp Jeeja <jeeja.kp@intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
"Subhransu S. Prusty" <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>,
lgirdwood@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: add api for dapm kcontrol configiuration
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:05:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140526150507.GQ22111@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401106136-3745-1-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1023 bytes --]
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:38:55PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> From: Subhransu S. Prusty <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com>
>
> For DSPs we need to set and get the value for snd_kcontrol. This is currently
> done by dapm_kcontrol_set/get_value, so create a wrapper
> snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_get/set_value APIs to let drivers use this
Can you provide any more detail on this than just simply stating that
this is needed for DSPs - why do DSPs need it, what are they going to do
with it?
> }
> +unsigned int snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_get_value(
Missing blank line.
> + const struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol)
> +{
> + dapm_kcontrol_get_value(kcontrol);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_get_value);
This function has a return value but no return statement, I'm surprised
the compiler didn't tell you this. To be honest I'm not sure why
dapm_kcontrol_get_value() wasn't just exported, the wrapper isn't adding
much and the function name is already so long that snd_soc_ isn't going
to hurt.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 12:08 [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: add api for dapm kcontrol configiuration Vinod Koul
2014-05-26 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: dapm: Add a helper to get the platform for DAPM kcontrol Vinod Koul
2014-05-26 12:44 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-05-26 12:51 ` Vinod Koul
2014-05-26 14:29 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-26 13:29 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-05-26 16:23 ` Vinod Koul
2014-05-26 16:52 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-05-26 16:47 ` Vinod Koul
2014-05-26 18:07 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-05-26 18:54 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-26 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: add api for dapm kcontrol configiuration Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-05-26 15:05 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-05-26 16:18 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140526150507.GQ22111@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=jeeja.kp@intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox