From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.jf.intel.com>,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: Intel: ACPI support and machines
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:01:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141104093120.GD1870@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415092510.7168.9.camel@loki>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:15:10AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 11:05 +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 11/04/2014 10:25 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:09:40AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think there is need to have some consolidation with current
> > >> byt-rt5640 and byt-max98090. Since existing drivers and this set are
> > >> using the same ACPI IDs "80860F28" for the ADSP and "10EC5640" codec
> > >> ACPIID for the machine driver probing these drivers won't work
> > >> together.
> > > Liam's suggestion was to remove the current driver when all the bits are
> > > upstream
>
> I think we need to keep the original driver around a bit longer until
> the new driver is stable on rambi and other platforms the old driver
> supports atm. A that point we can depricate the original driver with a
> view to eventual removal.
Yes agreed, taht would help
--
~Vinod
> > Yeah, I'm not against it but we must avoid regressions and perhaps try
> > to do seamless handover if possible. It's always more nice to find
> > regression in a small than big patch when bisecting :-)
> >
>
> Liam
>
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-04 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-04 5:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: Intel: ACPI support and machines Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: Intel: mrfld - remove unnecessary check for pointer Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ASoC: Intel: mrfld - create separate module for pci part Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ASoC: Intel: mrfld - add shim save restore Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ASoC: Intel: mrfld- add ACPI module Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ASoC: Intel: add BYTCR machine driver with RT5640 Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 9:19 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-11-04 9:32 ` Vinod Koul
2014-11-05 7:54 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-11-05 8:44 ` Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 8:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: Intel: ACPI support and machines Jarkko Nikula
2014-11-04 8:25 ` Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 9:05 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-11-04 9:15 ` Liam Girdwood
2014-11-04 9:31 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2014-11-04 9:33 ` Vinod Koul
2014-11-04 11:15 ` Mark Brown
2014-11-05 7:49 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-11-05 8:43 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141104093120.GD1870@intel.com \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@intel.com \
--cc=subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox