From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jack Yu <jack.yu@realtek.com>
Cc: "Oder Chiou" <oder_chiou@realtek.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"kent_chen@realtek.com [陳建宏]" <kent_chen@realtek.com>,
陳昶志 <kenny_chen@realtek.com>,
"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Derek [方德義]" <derek.fang@realtek.com>,
"Shuming [范書銘]" <shumingf@realtek.com>,
"Flove(HsinFu)" <flove@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt1015: modify calibration sequence for better performance
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:49:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104114915.GA5645@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3f369957a1d46cb81328fe0d8caf020@realtek.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 902 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 01:50:49PM +0000, Jack Yu wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you please help review below patch?
> Thanks a lot!
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-22 3:15 [PATCH] ASoC: rt1015: modify calibration sequence for better performance Jack Yu
2021-01-01 13:50 ` Jack Yu
2021-01-04 11:49 ` Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-04 3:01 jack.yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210104114915.GA5645@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=derek.fang@realtek.com \
--cc=flove@realtek.com \
--cc=jack.yu@realtek.com \
--cc=kenny_chen@realtek.com \
--cc=kent_chen@realtek.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=oder_chiou@realtek.com \
--cc=shumingf@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox