From: "Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
"Janusz Krzysztofik" <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>,
"Gražvydas Ignotas" <notasas@gmail.com>,
"Anuj Aggarwal" <anuj.aggarwal@ti.com>,
"Misael Lopez Cruz" <misael.lopez@ti.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lrg@ti.com>,
"Jarkko Nikula" <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: OMAP machines: Fix kernel crash due to changes in core
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:40:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3419773.iq8RNTCtj0@barack> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111007101711.GD19080@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Friday 07 October 2011 11:17:12 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:06:46AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Calling soc_dapm_sync() after adding DAPM widgets/routes
> > will lead to kernel crash caused by unitialized
> > widget->power_check callback (NULL pointer dereference).
> >
> > Call snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets(dapm); instead of soc_dapm_sync
> > which will initialize the widgets, and will call the
> > dapm_power_widgets (soc_dapm_sync is a wrapper for
> > dapm_power_widgets).
>
> No, there should be no need for either callback in individual drivers
> unless they're doing something very specialist. This will have been the
> case for a while now.
This might be true for machines, which adds jack functionality. We are now
calling snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets before adding jack pins.
Also machines passing their DAPM widgets/routes via snd_soc_card are safe from
this issue.
For machines, which does not add jacks the snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets will be
not called at all, which will eventually leads to a crash.
in soc-core.c: soc_post_component_init() the dai->init called, but there's no
additional snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets call to make sure that the new widgets
added by the machine driver are instantiated.
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 7:06 [PATCH] ASoC: OMAP machines: Fix kernel crash due to changes in core Peter Ujfalusi
2011-10-07 10:17 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-07 10:40 ` Péter Ujfalusi [this message]
2011-10-07 10:48 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-07 11:12 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-10-07 11:46 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-10-07 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-07 13:14 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-10-07 13:46 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-07 14:21 ` Péter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3419773.iq8RNTCtj0@barack \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=anuj.aggarwal@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=misael.lopez@ti.com \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox