From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com, tiwai@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: core: Inline resume work back to resume function
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:26:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ebce110-1a76-e59b-2172-616a3c0f1984@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2WmRUBJ+7K5zBm7@sirena.org.uk>
On 2022-11-05 12:54 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 09:58:46AM -0400, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> If I follow your logic, we should also remove the workqueue used for
>> probes for HDaudio devices, on the grounds that probe errors are not
>> propagated either.
(save)
>> Any time we have deferred processing to avoid blocking the rest of the
>> system, we incur the risk of not having errors propagated. It's a
>> compromise between having a system that's usable and a system that's
>> consistent.
> The other question is what we'd constructively do about a resume failure
> that we can't defer. It feels like we should at least retain the
> ability to defer for devices where this is an issue (older components
> tend to be cheap and packaged in easier to assemble packaging and hence
> get used with lower end applications even well after they're no longer
> competitive at the high end), and if we are going to return some errors
> in line it'd be good to understand the benefits and tradeoffs. I do see
> that it is a lot less useful for modern devices where we don't have to
> have any delays in startup, though like I say register I/O on slower
> buses like I2C could still be a concern.
>
> I'm not keen on moving the support out of the core since there were
> originally a bunch of devices trying to open code and it wasn't good,
> both from a duplication/complexity point of view and from the point of
> view of integrating well with userspace APIs.
I believe that framework should be supporting both, the deferred and the
instant resume options. 'void' in front of suspend/resume in ASoC
hinders developer's options.
(load)
The HDAudio driver is actually a good example of how to do it right - we
did not modify driver/base/ to have ->probe() return void. It remained
as is, instead, a developer opt-ins for a delayed probe through a
workqueue. This way, everyone is satisfied.
Cohesiveness is not to be forgotten too - keeping behavior and
expectations of the standard set of functionalities aligned with the
rest of the driver/base makes it easier to hop into ASoC.
We could provide some additional flags so that the ASoC core always
defers PM-related work for certain components if they choose to.
Regards,
Czarek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 13:12 [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: core: Suspend/resume error propagation Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: component: Propagate result of suspend and resume callbacks Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 14:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-07 8:51 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-11-07 14:11 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: core: Inline resume work back to resume function Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 13:58 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-04 23:54 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-07 9:26 ` Cezary Rojewski [this message]
2022-11-07 14:28 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-08 19:22 ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: core: Propagate component suspend/resume errors Cezary Rojewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ebce110-1a76-e59b-2172-616a3c0f1984@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox