From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.com,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
hdegoede@redhat.com, amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: core: Inline resume work back to resume function
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:22:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c600f448-9cbc-c67b-96ee-e78490f0495b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2kWKRLp2WARpPqZ@sirena.org.uk>
On 2022-11-07 3:28 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> It'd be good to at least have some idea of practical usage as well, the
> functions return void because nothing was making any use of the return
> values.
The problem is mainly connected to a resume operation as even if
something fails at suspend, there is a chance for the driver to recover
things up during resume.
Now, if something fails during the resume operation, blindly returning 0
makes userspace think everything is fine and we can keep going, whereas
the stream may no longer be operational and requires complete recovery
(close, reopen).
alsa-utils/aplay/aplay.c does snd_pcm_resume() as long as -EAGAIN is
returned, then falls back to snd_pcm_prepare() before finally giving up.
As snd_pcm_prepare() checks pcm's state before invoking ->prepare(), one
option is to set substream->runtime->status->state to
SNDRV_PCM_STATE_DISCONNECTED to ensure dai->hw_free() gets called right
after.
TLDR: it all comes down to some granularity missing. Suspend/resume for
the AudioDSP drivers do basically entire pcm-lifecycle within what is
supposed to be a simple TRIGGER_SUSPEND/RESUME operation.
> There's also an expectation that suspend and resume be fast...
You're right. Sound devices should not disturb the PM for the entire system.
Looking at this after thinking the performance/stability argument
through, indeed deferring work is a good way of dealing with the situation.
Regards,
Czarek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 13:12 [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: core: Suspend/resume error propagation Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: component: Propagate result of suspend and resume callbacks Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 14:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-07 8:51 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2022-11-07 14:11 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: core: Inline resume work back to resume function Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-04 13:58 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-04 23:54 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-07 9:26 ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-11-07 14:28 ` Mark Brown
2022-11-08 19:22 ` Cezary Rojewski [this message]
2022-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: core: Propagate component suspend/resume errors Cezary Rojewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c600f448-9cbc-c67b-96ee-e78490f0495b@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox