From: David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show processing coefficients in codec proc file
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:46:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6E9541.6000402@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hy6c2e4gs.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
2010-08-19 22:24, Takashi Iwai skrev:
> At Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:48:56 +0200,
> David Henningsson wrote:
>>
>> 2010-08-19 20:28, Takashi Iwai skrev:
>>> At Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:17:42 +0200,
>>> David Henningsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch is helpful for tracking down bugs without having all
>>>> information about the chip.
>>>
>>> I don't want to change coef index in reading a proc file in general.
>>
>> Good point. But I think the solution to that problem would be to
>> - read current index
>> - do the loop
>> - restore current index
>>
>> ...and perhaps protect that with an appropriate mutex (which one)?
>>
>>> If any, you should implement a codec-specific hook.
>>
>> I'm sorry, but I don't really see how that would help...?
>
> If it's specific to a codec, then you know whether reading the coef
> in that way can be harmful or not. It's not only about the race
> via proc file but also the influence of coef on the actual codec
> behavior.
Oh, so there are chips that are *that* broken...
Yet it could be a lifesaver so I wouldn't want to give up on the idea
just yet...
Do you know off the top of your head approximately what codec chips this
is about, where reading a coef (or setting its index) can cause unwanted
side-effects?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-20 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-19 18:17 [PATCH] Show processing coefficients in codec proc file David Henningsson
2010-08-19 18:28 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-08-19 18:48 ` David Henningsson
2010-08-19 20:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-08-20 14:46 ` David Henningsson [this message]
2010-08-20 16:03 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6E9541.6000402@canonical.com \
--to=david.henningsson@canonical.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox