Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
	timur@freescale.com, lrg@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: ASoC: cs4720: use snd_soc_cache_sync()
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:44:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECBC367.8080801@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111122153539.GF6624@sirena.org.uk>

On 11/22/2011 04:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:23:05PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> 
>> The bug is reproducible by setting the output volume to 50% before
>> sending the device to suspend. After wakeup, amixer still reports the
>> old volume level, but the codec is in fact set to 100%. Changing it to
>> 50% doesn't do anything, but to any other level has an effect. This is
>> clearly a cache sync bug, but the piece that's missing is the reason why
>> my patch does the right thing.
> 
> That's very odd, not ringing any bells at all.  It's not like the
> existing code is trying to do anything clever with skipping writes, it
> just blasts in all the register values and it's affecting two different
> registers.

The code is so simple that I'm starting to suspect
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() is doing something very wrong, but I can't
trace it without a hardware I2C analyzer right now. The i2c-regmap
low-level implementation uses different access functions under the hood,
so maybe that's a regression.

We also think that the effect is actually rather new.

> In any case, the patch is moving to factor code out in favour of core
> facilities so it's a good idea anyway.

Hmm, we should really care for the root cause, but maybe we can still
commit this thing, with a more appropriate commit log?


Daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-22 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-22 13:45 [PATCH] ALSA: ASoC: cs4720: use snd_soc_cache_sync() Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 14:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 15:23   ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 15:35     ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 15:37       ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-22 15:41         ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 15:43         ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 15:44       ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2011-11-22 15:47         ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-22 15:57           ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 16:12             ` Timur Tabi
2011-11-22 15:53         ` Mark Brown
2011-11-22 16:04           ` Daniel Mack
2011-11-22 16:08             ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ECBC367.8080801@gmail.com \
    --to=zonque@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
    --cc=timur@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox