Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available
       [not found]             ` <4FDF4D14.50203@wwwdotorg.org>
@ 2012-06-18 16:40               ` Roland Stigge
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Roland Stigge @ 2012-06-18 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Warren
  Cc: cjb, grant.likely, rob.herring, rmk+kernel, ulf.hansson,
	linus.walleij, linux-mmc, linux-kernel, aletes.xgr,
	linux-arm-kernel, broonie, lrg, perex, tiwai, alsa-devel

On 06/18/2012 05:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>>
>>>> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would
>>>> be the correct one to build on top?
>>>
>>> I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your
>>> patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but
>>> if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this.
>>
>> I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the
>> correct one to patch against?
> 
> Yes, that's the one. Thanks.

I'm posting this as a series of 2 for the sound changes only. Would be 
easiest to merge separately via sound/for-next, and the gpiolib-of 
change via gpio. However, this could break bisecting.

Since the respective precondition commits are only in the sound tree, 
this would be the only one practical for merging a single combined 
patch (combining those 3). Would this be OK for the GPIO maintainers? 
It's practically only a one-line change in gpiolib-of.c that would come 
in via sound.

Thanks in advance,

Roland


PS: Just for illustration purposes for the sound maintainers:
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -62,7 +62,10 @@ static int of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate(st
 int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, const char *propname,
                            int index, enum of_gpio_flags *flags)
 {
-       struct gg_data gg_data = { .flags = flags, .out_gpio = -ENODEV };
+       /* Return -EPROBE_DEFER to support probe() functions to be called
+        * later when the GPIO actually becomes available
+        */
+       struct gg_data gg_data = { .flags = flags, .out_gpio = -EPROBE_DEFER };
        int ret;

        /* .of_xlate might decide to not fill in the flags, so clear it. */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-06-18 16:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1339927893-8842-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de>
     [not found] ` <4FDE8D27.6030508@wwwdotorg.org>
     [not found]   ` <4FDEF293.9080305@antcom.de>
     [not found]     ` <4FDF403E.9090302@wwwdotorg.org>
     [not found]       ` <4FDF4461.60707@antcom.de>
     [not found]         ` <4FDF4543.6090009@wwwdotorg.org>
     [not found]           ` <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de>
     [not found]             ` <4FDF4D14.50203@wwwdotorg.org>
2012-06-18 16:40               ` [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available Roland Stigge

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox