From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: sylvain.bertrand@gmail.com
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: sw_params for a direct-ed(dmix) hw pcm
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:34:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59266c58-96d8-93e9-bc8f-86e9fccf8d60@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200328203744.GA2398@freedom>
On 3/28/20 3:37 PM, sylvain.bertrand@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:15:34PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> I don't think it's possible unless the timestamps are taken really close to
>> each other. There was some work some by Chris Hall in 2016 to revisit how
>> the conversions were done and the past taken into account is a couple of ms,
>> see ("time: Add history to cross timestamp interface supporting slower
>> devices").
>>
>> if your device is "shared", which implies a mixer, the notion of precise
>> timestamps is rather questionable so you might be able to get-by with local
>> interpolation in your plug-ins. Trying a full-blown conversion of the
>> kernel-reported time is not really useful if the mixing granularity is in
>> the ms range or more.
>>
>> FWIW you also want to take MONOTONIC_RAW with a grain of salt. In a corner
>> case w/ long tests lasting 48 hours we saw the timestamps reported by the
>> kernel drift over time. the drift was minor (double-digit ppb - yes parts
>> per billion) but the fixed-point math for the counters at some point impacts
>> the results. Reading directly the TSC from userspace and doing
>> floating-point math bypassed the rounding errors.
>
> This is how I got into this: I was writting a naive audio application and
> arrived at the point I needed timing information to do exactly that, a rough,
> but enough, audio linear interpolation (with ffmpeg timestamp). I naively
> configured alsa to use monotonic_raw, because avoiding ntp for audio timing was
> a good idea, and when I did sample on my side the monotonic raw clock, I
> realised that everything was off 100s of ms (alsa defaults to monotonic and
> ignores monotonic_raw setting in the case of a shared device). I followed the
> white rabbit, and here I stand. The cherry on top was the inconsistency about
> the trigger timestamp (which is not meant to be close to the other timestamps).
>
> This pushes to fix snd_pcm_sw_params_set_tstamp_type(): recursive along a pcm
> plugin "pipeline" and return an error in the case of a setting difference from
> the one chosen by dmix.
> I am not confident at all since I have only a minimal perspective on alsa.
Using MONOTONIC_RAW is very nice on paper, until you realize you can't
program a timer using the information. You can only read the timestamp
and not really do much if you want to sleep/wait.
In practice, if you really really need super-precise information you'll
get use rdtsc(), and apply you own formulas. And otherwise stick with
MONOTONIC, it's rather unlikely you will ever notice the NTP changes.
PulseAudio, CRAS and a number of Android HALs use MONOTONIC and nobody
ever complained.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-28 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-21 15:53 monotonic raw setup seems buggy sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-25 17:44 ` sw_params for a direct-ed(dmix) hw pcm sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-26 12:02 ` Kai Vehmanen
2020-03-26 14:36 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-03-26 20:04 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-27 8:08 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-03-27 9:40 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-03-28 18:26 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-28 19:15 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-28 20:37 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-28 21:34 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-03-28 22:20 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-03-29 7:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-03-31 11:32 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-04-01 15:25 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-01 15:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-04-01 20:21 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-02 19:03 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-06 13:49 ` sylvain.bertrand
2020-04-14 15:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-04-14 23:20 ` sylvain.bertrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59266c58-96d8-93e9-bc8f-86e9fccf8d60@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sylvain.bertrand@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox