Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,  broonie@kernel.org
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, tiwai@suse.com, amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: Mark BE DAIs as nonatomic for hsw and
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:59:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <650468f2-4a68-d1fa-157c-827fda5f1ed5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c668f83e-d9fb-35dc-a06d-6563d20ddc8c@intel.com>



On 6/27/22 10:41, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2022-06-27 4:45 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> On 6/25/22 03:29, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> 
>>> Hmm.. that's a good feedback. Isn't ASoC's FE<->BE treated as a single
>>> PCM substream in sound/core/pcm_native.c though? If so, does it even
>>> make sense for card's BE DAI to be atomic, if it's FE counterpart is
>>> nonatomic already? Especially if it is specifying platform and cpu_dai
>>> that matches Intel's components which we know communicate using IPCs.
>>
>> I guess it depends on the cpu_dai implementation. Not all
>> implementations implement a delay in the .trigger callback and/or rely
>> on IPCs.
>>
>>> Warning is one thing, but will you be also getting rid of the
>>> if-statement in soc-pcm.c that actually forces nonatomic=1 on BE when FE
>>> is already declared as such? If the if-statement stays, I believe the
>>> declaring BE DAIs 'correctly' in the way to go.
>>
>> I meant just removing the dev_warn() only.
>>
>> See https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3723
> 
> So the framework is still fixing the flag for the driver. Ideally we
> would like to have all the drivers assign correct values to ->nonatomic
> flag themselves.
> 
> Now when I think about it, the message seems useful - at least as
> dev_dbg(). It _guides_ driver developer to the desired approach: setting
> the ->nonatomic flag for BE to '1' if the corresponding FE is already
> configured as such.

that would result in unnecessary changes to all machine drivers to get
rid of the message...

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-27 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-24 13:43 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: Mark BE DAIs as nonatomic for hsw and Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: Intel: hsw_rt5640: Mark BE DAI as nonatomic Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt286: " Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt5650: " Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-24 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: Intel: bdw_rt5677: " Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-24 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: Mark BE DAIs as nonatomic for hsw and Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-25  8:29   ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-27 14:45     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-06-27 15:41       ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-06-27 15:59         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-06-27 16:13           ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-07-08 15:44       ` Mark Brown
2022-07-09  8:51         ` Cezary Rojewski
2022-07-15 18:56 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=650468f2-4a68-d1fa-157c-827fda5f1ed5@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox