Re: [PATCH 12/13] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Convert to PCI device IDs defines

["Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>]

On 7/11/2023 4:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:57:25PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>> Use PCI device IDs from pci_ids.h header and while at it change to using
>> PCI_DEVICE_DATA() macro, to simplify declarations.
> 
> FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Oh, additional remark below.
> 
>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c |  9 +++----
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-cnl.c | 15 ++++--------
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-icl.c | 12 ++++------
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-mtl.c |  3 +--
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-skl.c |  6 ++---
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c | 45 ++++++++++++-----------------------
>>   sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tng.c |  3 +--
>>   7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c
>> index 69cad5a6bc72..083659ddfe6b 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-apl.c
>> @@ -85,12 +85,9 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc glk_desc = {
>>   
>>   /* PCI IDs */
>>   static const struct pci_device_id sof_pci_ids[] = {
>> -	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x5a98), /* BXT-P (ApolloLake) */
>> -		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&bxt_desc},
>> -	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x1a98),/* BXT-T */
>> -		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&bxt_desc},
>> -	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x3198), /* GeminiLake */
>> -		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&glk_desc},
>> +	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_APL, &bxt_desc) },
>> +	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_APL_T, &bxt_desc) },
> 
> Have we ever had APL-T? What is that? I remember that we have had two or
> three BXTs inside, and then products become for Broxton and Apollo Lake
> SoC codenames. I never have heard about -T...
> 

I've talked a bit with Cezary and it seems that 0x1a98 is BXT-M (not -T) 
and it's an RVP, BXT-M B0 to be specific. From what we know no BXT is 
available on market. Perhaps we can just remove it?