From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Jin-Young Park <mcjin02@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: wrong print debugging message code
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5habhc4dz6.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <280b69ac0806202244s11e74363l4de3f020fed849be@mail.gmail.com>
At Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:44:47 +0900,
Jin-Young Park wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I written ASoC Audio driver for our company chip in linux kernel 2.6.24.1.
> New kernel 2.6.25.7 released before several days.
> So, I merge my ASoC Audio dirver to kernel 2.6.25.7.
> then I found wrong code that print debuuging message code in several files.
> These file location is kernel_src/sound/soc/codecs for SoC audio codec
> drvier files
>
> These files include follow define code for print debug message.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> #define XXXX_DEBUG 0
>
> #ifdef XXXX_DEBUG
> #define dbg(format, arg...) \
> printk(KERN_DEBUG AUDIO_NAME ": " format "\n" , ## arg)
> #else
> #define dbg(format, arg...) do {} while (0)
> #endif
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think "#ifdef XXXX_DEBUG" line is wrong. Because, XXXX_DEBUG was already
> defined 0.
> I known that "#ifdef" is only check defined or not defined, 0 or 1(false or
> true) are not check.
> "#if XXXX_DEBUG" code is more correct than "#ifdef XXXX_DEBUG".
#ifdef XXX_DEBUG is more common than #if XXX_DEBUG in the kernel
tree. So, I'd suggest to keep #ifdef style.
The confusing thing is that it defines to '0' (and I'm not sure the
debug is activated as default in the current code -- Mark, Liam, is it
intentional?).
IMO, the debug should be basically off as default, and if enabled, it
should be defined to '1'.
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-23 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-21 5:44 wrong print debugging message code Jin-Young Park
2008-06-23 10:55 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2008-06-23 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2008-06-23 12:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-06-23 12:17 ` Mark Brown
2008-06-23 18:18 ` Jin-Young Park
2008-06-23 18:51 ` Mark Brown
2008-06-24 5:55 ` Jin-Young Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5habhc4dz6.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=mcjin02@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox