* [PATCH] drm/amd/display: wait for fence without holding reservation lock
@ 2019-04-02 14:28 Christian König
[not found] ` <20190402142813.8381-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2019-04-02 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicholas.Kazlauskas-5C7GfCeVMHo, harry.wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Don't block others while waiting for the fences to finish, concurrent
submission is perfectly valid in this case and holding the lock can
prevent killed applications from terminating.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
index 697af51d403a..9426e701a7b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
@@ -5129,23 +5129,26 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
continue;
}
+ abo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(fb->obj[0]);
+
+ /* Wait for all fences on this FB */
+ r = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(abo->tbo.resv, true,
+ false,
+ MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ WARN_ON(r < 0);
+
/*
* TODO This might fail and hence better not used, wait
* explicitly on fences instead
* and in general should be called for
* blocking commit to as per framework helpers
*/
- abo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(fb->obj[0]);
r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo, true);
if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
DRM_ERROR("failed to reserve buffer before flip\n");
WARN_ON(1);
}
- /* Wait for all fences on this FB */
- WARN_ON(reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(abo->tbo.resv, true, false,
- MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) < 0);
-
amdgpu_bo_get_tiling_flags(abo, &tiling_flags);
amdgpu_bo_unreserve(abo);
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: wait for fence without holding reservation lock
[not found] ` <20190402142813.8381-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
@ 2019-04-02 14:41 ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
[not found] ` <9f78fcd2-2753-7145-03f9-cee3f4da9938-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kazlauskas, Nicholas @ 2019-04-02 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Wentland, Harry,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
On 4/2/19 10:28 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Don't block others while waiting for the fences to finish, concurrent
> submission is perfectly valid in this case and holding the lock can
> prevent killed applications from terminating.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
I do recall having the discussion about this a while back with you and
Andrey.
I highly doubt that the flags would ever really change here (if they're
even capable) between the wait and the lock so I think this is fine.
I think there's a bigger problem with that and how they could
potentially change between atomic check and atomic commit tail anyway
(and doing something bad after we think it's passed validation).
But this is mostly a theoretical concern I think rather than a practical
one.
Thanks.
Nicholas Kazlauskas
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index 697af51d403a..9426e701a7b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> @@ -5129,23 +5129,26 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> continue;
> }
>
> + abo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(fb->obj[0]);
> +
> + /* Wait for all fences on this FB */
> + r = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(abo->tbo.resv, true,
> + false,
> + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + WARN_ON(r < 0);
> +
> /*
> * TODO This might fail and hence better not used, wait
> * explicitly on fences instead
> * and in general should be called for
> * blocking commit to as per framework helpers
> */
> - abo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(fb->obj[0]);
> r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo, true);
> if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to reserve buffer before flip\n");
> WARN_ON(1);
> }
>
> - /* Wait for all fences on this FB */
> - WARN_ON(reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(abo->tbo.resv, true, false,
> - MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) < 0);
> -
> amdgpu_bo_get_tiling_flags(abo, &tiling_flags);
>
> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(abo);
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: wait for fence without holding reservation lock
[not found] ` <9f78fcd2-2753-7145-03f9-cee3f4da9938-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
@ 2019-04-02 14:45 ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kazlauskas, Nicholas @ 2019-04-02 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Wentland, Harry,
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
On 4/2/19 10:41 AM, Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote:
> On 4/2/19 10:28 AM, Christian König wrote:
>> Don't block others while waiting for the fences to finish, concurrent
>> submission is perfectly valid in this case and holding the lock can
>> prevent killed applications from terminating.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
>
> I do recall having the discussion about this a while back with you and
> Andrey.
>
> I highly doubt that the flags would ever really change here (if they're
> even capable) between the wait and the lock so I think this is fine.
>
> I think there's a bigger problem with that and how they could
> potentially change between atomic check and atomic commit tail anyway
> (and doing something bad after we think it's passed validation).
>
> But this is mostly a theoretical concern I think rather than a practical
> one.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Nicholas Kazlauskas
...and waiting for the fence isn't really analogous to ensuring that
they can't change in the first place I suppose.
This looks fine.
Nicholas Kazlauskas
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> index 697af51d403a..9426e701a7b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>> @@ -5129,23 +5129,26 @@ static void amdgpu_dm_commit_planes(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + abo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(fb->obj[0]);
>> +
>> + /* Wait for all fences on this FB */
>> + r = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(abo->tbo.resv, true,
>> + false,
>> + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>> + WARN_ON(r < 0);
>> +
>> /*
>> * TODO This might fail and hence better not used, wait
>> * explicitly on fences instead
>> * and in general should be called for
>> * blocking commit to as per framework helpers
>> */
>> - abo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(fb->obj[0]);
>> r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo, true);
>> if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
>> DRM_ERROR("failed to reserve buffer before flip\n");
>> WARN_ON(1);
>> }
>>
>> - /* Wait for all fences on this FB */
>> - WARN_ON(reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(abo->tbo.resv, true, false,
>> - MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT) < 0);
>> -
>> amdgpu_bo_get_tiling_flags(abo, &tiling_flags);
>>
>> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(abo);
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-02 14:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-02 14:28 [PATCH] drm/amd/display: wait for fence without holding reservation lock Christian König
[not found] ` <20190402142813.8381-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-02 14:41 ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
[not found] ` <9f78fcd2-2753-7145-03f9-cee3f4da9938-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-02 14:45 ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox