From: Huang Rui <ray.huang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: "Christian König"
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators v2
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:58:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180913065801.GA3371@hr-amur2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180912085445.3245-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Both a leaf as well as dfs iterator to walk over all the PDs/PTs.
>
> v2: update comments and fix for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Series are Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 224 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 136b00412dc8..787a200cf796 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -355,6 +355,230 @@ static struct amdgpu_vm_pt *amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(struct amdgpu_vm_pt *pt)
> return list_first_entry(&parent->va, struct amdgpu_vm_pt, base.bo_list);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor - state for for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt
> + */
> +struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor {
> + uint64_t pfn;
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt *parent;
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt *entry;
> + unsigned level;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_start - start PD/PT walk
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @start: start address of the walk
> + * @cursor: state to initialize
> + *
> + * Initialize a amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor to start a walk.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm, uint64_t start,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + cursor->pfn = start;
> + cursor->parent = NULL;
> + cursor->entry = &vm->root;
> + cursor->level = adev->vm_manager.root_level;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant - go to child node
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk to the child node of the current node.
> + * Returns:
> + * True if the walk was possible, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + unsigned num_entries, shift, idx;
> +
> + if (!cursor->entry->entries)
> + return false;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!cursor->entry->base.bo);
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level);
> + shift = amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level);
> +
> + ++cursor->level;
> + idx = (cursor->pfn >> shift) % num_entries;
> + cursor->parent = cursor->entry;
> + cursor->entry = &cursor->entry->entries[idx];
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling - go to sibling node
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk to the sibling node of the current node.
> + * Returns:
> + * True if the walk was possible, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + unsigned shift, num_entries;
> +
> + /* Root doesn't have a sibling */
> + if (!cursor->parent)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Go to our parents and see if we got a sibling */
> + shift = amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level - 1);
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level - 1);
> +
> + if (cursor->entry == &cursor->parent->entries[num_entries - 1])
> + return false;
> +
> + cursor->pfn += 1ULL << shift;
> + cursor->pfn &= ~((1ULL << shift) - 1);
> + ++cursor->entry;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor - go to parent node
> + *
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk to the parent node of the current node.
> + * Returns:
> + * True if the walk was possible, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + if (!cursor->parent)
> + return false;
> +
> + --cursor->level;
> + cursor->entry = cursor->parent;
> + cursor->parent = amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(cursor->parent);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_next - get next PD/PT in hieratchy
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk the PD/PT tree to the next node.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + /* First try a newborn child */
> + if (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor))
> + return;
> +
> + /* If that didn't worked try to find a sibling */
> + while (!amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(adev, cursor)) {
> + /* No sibling, go to our parents and grandparents */
> + if (!amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor)) {
> + cursor->pfn = ~0ll;
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf - get first leaf PD/PT
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @start: start addr of the walk
> + * @cursor: state to initialize
> + *
> + * Start a walk and go directly to the leaf node.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm, uint64_t start,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, vm, start, cursor);
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf - get next leaf PD/PT
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Walk the PD/PT tree to the next leaf node.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_next(adev, cursor);
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_leaf - walk over all leaf PDs/PTs in the hierarchy
> + */
> +#define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_leaf(adev, vm, start, end, cursor) \
> + for (amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf((adev), (vm), (start), &(cursor)); \
> + (cursor).pfn <= end; amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf((adev), &(cursor)))
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs - start a deep first search
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device structure
> + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @cursor: state to initialize
> + *
> + * Starts a deep first traversal of the PD/PT tree.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, vm, 0, cursor);
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs - get the next node for a deep first search
> + *
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device structure
> + * @cursor: current state
> + *
> + * Move the cursor to the next node in a deep first search.
> + */
> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> +{
> + if (!cursor->entry)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!cursor->parent)
> + cursor->entry = NULL;
> + else if (amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(adev, cursor))
> + while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor));
> + else
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe - safe deep first search of all PDs/PTs
> + */
> +#define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, cursor, entry) \
> + for (amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs((adev), (vm), &(cursor)), \
> + (entry) = (cursor).entry, amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs((adev), &(cursor));\
> + (entry); (entry) = (cursor).entry, \
> + amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs((adev), &(cursor)))
> +
> /**
> * amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo - add the VM PD to a validation list
> *
> --
> 2.14.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-13 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 8:54 [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators v2 Christian König
[not found] ` <20180912085445.3245-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/amdgpu: use leaf iterator for allocating PD/PT Christian König
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: use dfs iterator to free PDs/PTs Christian König
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/amdgpu: use the DFS iterator in amdgpu_vm_invalidate_pds v2 Christian König
[not found] ` <20180912085445.3245-4-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-13 2:52 ` Zhang, Jerry(Junwei)
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/amdgpu: use leaf iterator for filling PTs Christian König
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/amdgpu: meld together VM fragment and huge page handling Christian König
[not found] ` <20180912085445.3245-6-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-08 16:17 ` Samuel Pitoiset
[not found] ` <cd923303-6208-3593-74fe-0d9e7b83c12c-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-08 16:50 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <f2d67c06-063f-6441-0699-1ab283a99f6c-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-08 19:35 ` Samuel Pitoiset
[not found] ` <363ce01b-c6f1-21bc-329e-bbb4ec568ba8-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-09 12:13 ` Koenig, Christian
[not found] ` <c4ffbce4-5225-dfc1-8056-2575b6bbdd9c-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-12 15:16 ` Christian König
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/amdgpu: use the maximum possible fragment size on Vega/Raven Christian König
2018-09-12 8:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/amdgpu: allow fragment processing for invalid PTEs Christian König
2018-09-12 23:12 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators v2 Felix Kuehling
2018-09-13 2:51 ` Zhang, Jerry(Junwei)
2018-09-13 6:58 ` Huang Rui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180913065801.GA3371@hr-amur2 \
--to=ray.huang-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
--cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox