public inbox for amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Jerry(Junwei)" <Jerry.Zhang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: "Christian König"
	<ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators v2
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:51:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c69449cb-c9fc-6239-4561-ced4e8828d38@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180912085445.3245-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7068 bytes --]

On 09/12/2018 04:54 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Both a leaf as well as dfs iterator to walk over all the PDs/PTs. v2: 
> update comments and fix for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe Signed-off-by: 
> Christian König <christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 224 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 224 insertions(+) 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c index 
> 136b00412dc8..787a200cf796 100644 --- 
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c +++ 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c @@ -355,6 +355,230 @@ static 
> struct amdgpu_vm_pt *amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(struct amdgpu_vm_pt *pt) 
> return list_first_entry(&parent->va, struct amdgpu_vm_pt, 
> base.bo_list); } +/** + * amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor - state for 
> for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt + */ +struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor { + uint64_t 
> pfn; + struct amdgpu_vm_pt *parent; + struct amdgpu_vm_pt *entry; + 
> unsigned level; +}; + +/** + * amdgpu_vm_pt_start - start PD/PT walk + 
> * + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure + * 
> @start: start address of the walk + * @cursor: state to initialize + * 
> + * Initialize a amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor to start a walk. + */ +static 
> void amdgpu_vm_pt_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct amdgpu_vm 
> *vm, uint64_t start, + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + 
> cursor->pfn = start; + cursor->parent = NULL; + cursor->entry = 
> &vm->root; + cursor->level = adev->vm_manager.root_level; +} + +/** + 
> * amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant - go to child node + * + * @adev: 
> amdgpu_device pointer + * @cursor: current state + * + * Walk to the 
> child node of the current node. + * Returns: + * True if the walk was 
> possible, false otherwise. + */ +static bool 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + unsigned num_entries, shift, idx; + 
> + if (!cursor->entry->entries) + return false; + + 
> BUG_ON(!cursor->entry->base.bo); + num_entries = 
> amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level); + shift = 
> amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level); + + ++cursor->level; + idx 
> = (cursor->pfn >> shift) % num_entries; + cursor->parent = 
> cursor->entry; + cursor->entry = &cursor->entry->entries[idx]; + 
> return true; +} + +/** + * amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling - go to sibling node + 
> * + * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer + * @cursor: current state + * + * 
> Walk to the sibling node of the current node. + * Returns: + * True if 
> the walk was possible, false otherwise. + */ +static bool 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + unsigned shift, num_entries; + + /* 
> Root doesn't have a sibling */ + if (!cursor->parent) + return false; 
> + + /* Go to our parents and see if we got a sibling */ + shift = 
> amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level - 1); + num_entries = 
> amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level - 1); + + if (cursor->entry 
> == &cursor->parent->entries[num_entries - 1]) + return false; + + 
> cursor->pfn += 1ULL << shift; + cursor->pfn &= ~((1ULL << shift) - 1); 
> + ++cursor->entry; + return true; +} + +/** + * amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor 
> - go to parent node + * + * @cursor: current state + * + * Walk to the 
> parent node of the current node. + * Returns: + * True if the walk was 
> possible, false otherwise. + */ +static bool 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + if 
> (!cursor->parent) + return false; + + --cursor->level; + cursor->entry 
> = cursor->parent; + cursor->parent = 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(cursor->parent); + return true; +} + +/** + * 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_next - get next PD/PT in hieratchy + * + * @adev: 
> amdgpu_device pointer + * @cursor: current state + * + * Walk the 
> PD/PT tree to the next node. + */ +static void 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_next(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + /* First try a newborn child */ + if 
> (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor)) + return; + + /* If that 
> didn't worked try to find a sibling */ + while 
> (!amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(adev, cursor)) { + /* No sibling, go to our 
> parents and grandparents */ + if (!amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor)) { + 
> cursor->pfn = ~0ll; + return; + } + } +} + +/** + * 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf - get first leaf PD/PT + * + * @adev: 
> amdgpu_device pointer + * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure + * @start: start 
> addr of the walk + * @cursor: state to initialize + * + * Start a walk 
> and go directly to the leaf node. + */ +static void 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct amdgpu_vm 
> *vm, uint64_t start, + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, vm, start, cursor); + while 
> (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor)); +} + +/** + * 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf - get next leaf PD/PT + * + * @adev: 
> amdgpu_device pointer + * @cursor: current state + * + * Walk the 
> PD/PT tree to the next leaf node. + */ +static void 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + amdgpu_vm_pt_next(adev, cursor); + 
> while (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor)); +} + +/** + * 
> for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_leaf - walk over all leaf PDs/PTs in the 
> hierarchy + */ +#define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_leaf(adev, vm, start, 
> end, cursor) \ + for (amdgpu_vm_pt_first_leaf((adev), (vm), (start), 
> &(cursor)); \ + (cursor).pfn <= end; amdgpu_vm_pt_next_leaf((adev), 
> &(cursor))) + +/** + * amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs - start a deep first 
> search + * + * @adev: amdgpu_device structure + * @vm: amdgpu_vm 
> structure + * @cursor: state to initialize + * + * Starts a deep first 
> traversal of the PD/PT tree. + */ +static void 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct amdgpu_vm 
> *vm, + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, vm, 0, cursor); + while 
> (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor)); +} + +/** + * 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs - get the next node for a deep first search + * 
> + * @adev: amdgpu_device structure + * @cursor: current state + * + * 
> Move the cursor to the next node in a deep first search. + */ +static 
> void amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev, + struct 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor) +{ + if (!cursor->entry) + return; + + if 
> (!cursor->parent) + cursor->entry = NULL; + else if 
> (amdgpu_vm_pt_sibling(adev, cursor)) + while 
> (amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(adev, cursor)); + else + 
> amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor); +} + +/** + * 
> for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe - safe deep first search of all PDs/PTs 
> + */ +#define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, cursor, entry) 
> \ + for (amdgpu_vm_pt_first_dfs((adev), (vm), &(cursor)), \ + (entry) 
> = (cursor).entry, amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs((adev), &(cursor));\ + 
> (entry); (entry) = (cursor).entry, \ + amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs((adev), 
> &(cursor))) + /** * amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo - add the VM PD to a 
> validation list *


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7943 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-13  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-12  8:54 [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators v2 Christian König
     [not found] ` <20180912085445.3245-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/amdgpu: use leaf iterator for allocating PD/PT Christian König
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: use dfs iterator to free PDs/PTs Christian König
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/amdgpu: use the DFS iterator in amdgpu_vm_invalidate_pds v2 Christian König
     [not found]     ` <20180912085445.3245-4-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-13  2:52       ` Zhang, Jerry(Junwei)
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/amdgpu: use leaf iterator for filling PTs Christian König
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/amdgpu: meld together VM fragment and huge page handling Christian König
     [not found]     ` <20180912085445.3245-6-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-08 16:17       ` Samuel Pitoiset
     [not found]         ` <cd923303-6208-3593-74fe-0d9e7b83c12c-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-08 16:50           ` Christian König
     [not found]             ` <f2d67c06-063f-6441-0699-1ab283a99f6c-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-08 19:35               ` Samuel Pitoiset
     [not found]                 ` <363ce01b-c6f1-21bc-329e-bbb4ec568ba8-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-09 12:13                   ` Koenig, Christian
     [not found]                     ` <c4ffbce4-5225-dfc1-8056-2575b6bbdd9c-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-12 15:16                       ` Christian König
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/amdgpu: use the maximum possible fragment size on Vega/Raven Christian König
2018-09-12  8:54   ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/amdgpu: allow fragment processing for invalid PTEs Christian König
2018-09-12 23:12   ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: add some VM PD/PT iterators v2 Felix Kuehling
2018-09-13  2:51   ` Zhang, Jerry(Junwei) [this message]
2018-09-13  6:58   ` Huang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c69449cb-c9fc-6239-4561-ced4e8828d38@amd.com \
    --to=jerry.zhang-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox