[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 33/41] drm/amdgpu: clean wptr on wb when gpu recovery

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 33/41] drm/amdgpu: clean wptr on wb when gpu recovery

[Sasha Levin]

From: Yintian Tao <yttao@amd.com>

[ Upstream commit 2ab7e274b86739f4ceed5d94b6879f2d07b2802f ]

The TDR will be randomly failed due to compute ring
test failure. If the compute ring wptr & 0x7ff(ring_buf_mask)
is 0x100 then after map mqd the compute ring rptr will be
synced with 0x100. And the ring test packet size is also 0x100.
Then after invocation of amdgpu_ring_commit, the cp will not
really handle the packet on the ring buffer because rptr is equal to wptr.

Signed-off-by: Yintian Tao <yttao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c  | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
index 6b5b243af15dc..1a80423b1d4f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
@@ -3496,6 +3496,7 @@ static int gfx_v10_0_kcq_init_queue(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
 
 		/* reset ring buffer */
 		ring->wptr = 0;
+		atomic64_set((atomic64_t *)&adev->wb.wb[ring->wptr_offs], 0);
 		amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
 	} else {
 		amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index 085b84322e928..67f30fec94df2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -3538,6 +3538,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_kcq_init_queue(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
 
 		/* reset ring buffer */
 		ring->wptr = 0;
+		atomic64_set((atomic64_t *)&adev->wb.wb[ring->wptr_offs], 0);
 		amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
 	} else {
 		amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 34/41] drm/amd/display: Clear link settings on MST disable connector

[Sasha Levin]

From: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>

[ Upstream commit 5ac7fd2f597b88ee81f4748ee50cab06192a8dc3 ]

[Why]
If we have a single MST display and we disconnect it, we dont disable that
link. This causes the old link settings to still exist

Now on a replug for MST we think its a link loss and will try to reallocate
mst payload which will fail, throwing warning below.

[  129.374192] [drm] Failed to updateMST allocation table forpipe idx:0
[  129.374206] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  129.374284] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1710 at
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../dal-dev/dc/core/dc_link.c:3153
dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x1f7/0x220 [amdgpu]

[  129.374285] Modules linked in: amdgpu(OE) amd_iommu_v2 gpu_sched ttm
drm_kms_helper drm fb_sys_fops syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt
binfmt_misc nls_iso8859_1 edac_mce_amd snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hda_codec_generic ledtrig_audio kvm snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_intel
snd_intel_nhlt snd_hda_codec irqbypass snd_hda_core snd_hwdep snd_pcm
snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi crct10dif_pclmul snd_seq
crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_seq_device snd_timer snd aesni_intel
eeepc_wmi crypto_simd asus_wmi joydev cryptd sparse_keymap input_leds
soundcore video glue_helper wmi_bmof mxm_wmi k10temp ccp mac_hid
sch_fq_codel parport_pc ppdev lp parport ip_tables x_tables autofs4
hid_generic usbhid hid igb i2c_algo_bit ahci dca i2c_piix4 libahci
gpio_amdpt wmi gpio_generic

[  129.374318] CPU: 14 PID: 1710 Comm: kworker/14:2 Tainted: G        W  OE     5.4.0-rc7bhawan+ #480
[  129.374318] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 0515 03/30/2017
[  129.374397] Workqueue: events dm_irq_work_func [amdgpu]
[  129.374468] RIP: 0010:dc_link_allocate_mst_payload+0x1f7/0x220 [amdgpu]
[  129.374470] Code: 52 20 e8 1c 63 ad f4 48 8b 5d d0 65 48 33 1c 25 28 00
00 00 b8 01 00 00 00 75 16 48 8d 65 d8 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3
<0f> 0b e9 fa fe ff ff e8 ed 5b d6 f3 41 0f b6 b6 c4 02 00 00 48 c7
[  129.374471] RSP: 0018:ffff9f9141e7fcc0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[  129.374472] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff91ef0762f800 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  129.374473] RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: ffffffffc0c4a988 RDI: 0000000000000004
[  129.374474] RBP: ffff9f9141e7fd10 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
[  129.374475] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff91eebd510c00
[  129.374475] R13: ffff91eebd510e58 R14: ffff91ef052c01b8 R15: 0000000000000006
[  129.374476] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91ef0ef80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  129.374477] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  129.374478] CR2: 000055623ea01d50 CR3: 0000000408a8c000 CR4: 00000000003406e0
[  129.374479] Call Trace:
[  129.374550]  dc_link_reallocate_mst_payload+0x12e/0x150 [amdgpu]
[  129.374617]  dc_link_handle_hpd_rx_irq+0x6d4/0x6e0 [amdgpu]
[  129.374693]  handle_hpd_rx_irq+0x77/0x310 [amdgpu]
[  129.374768]  dm_irq_work_func+0x53/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  129.374774]  process_one_work+0x1fd/0x3f0
[  129.374776]  worker_thread+0x255/0x410
[  129.374778]  kthread+0x121/0x140
[  129.374780]  ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
[  129.374781]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
[  129.374785]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40

[How]
when we disable MST we should clear the cur link settings (lane_count=0 is
good enough). This will cause us to not reallocate payloads earlier than
expected and not throw the warning

Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
index 2bf8534c18fbe..1e3bc708b2e8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void dm_dp_destroy_mst_connector(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 					   aconnector->dc_sink);
 		dc_sink_release(aconnector->dc_sink);
 		aconnector->dc_sink = NULL;
+		aconnector->dc_link->cur_link_settings.lane_count = 0;
 	}
 
 	drm_connector_unregister(connector);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 35/41] drm/amd/display: fix dcc swath size calculations on dcn1

[Sasha Levin]

From: Josip Pavic <Josip.Pavic@amd.com>

[ Upstream commit a0275dfc82c9034eefbeffd556cca6dd239d7925 ]

[Why]
Swath sizes are being calculated incorrectly. The horizontal swath size
should be the product of block height, viewport width, and bytes per
element, but the calculation uses viewport height instead of width. The
vertical swath size is similarly incorrectly calculated. The effect of
this is that we report the wrong DCC caps.

[How]
Use viewport width in the horizontal swath size calculation and viewport
height in the vertical swath size calculation.

Signed-off-by: Josip Pavic <Josip.Pavic@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hubbub.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hubbub.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hubbub.c
index a02c10e23e0d6..d163388c99a06 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hubbub.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_hubbub.c
@@ -840,8 +840,8 @@ static void hubbub1_det_request_size(
 
 	hubbub1_get_blk256_size(&blk256_width, &blk256_height, bpe);
 
-	swath_bytes_horz_wc = height * blk256_height * bpe;
-	swath_bytes_vert_wc = width * blk256_width * bpe;
+	swath_bytes_horz_wc = width * blk256_height * bpe;
+	swath_bytes_vert_wc = height * blk256_width * bpe;
 
 	*req128_horz_wc = (2 * swath_bytes_horz_wc <= detile_buf_size) ?
 			false : /* full 256B request */
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx