From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: "Andrey Grodzovsky" <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
"daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: Lockdep spalt on killing a processes
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:07:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6aa79474-e998-368b-bb53-b43f135f5a0c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0a54261-f83a-8402-31dd-009588adece6@amd.com>
Am 28.10.21 um 19:26 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
>
> On 2021-10-27 3:58 p.m., Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-10-27 10:50 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 27.10.21 um 16:47 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
>>>>
>>>> On 2021-10-27 10:34 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>>>> Am 27.10.21 um 16:27 schrieb Andrey Grodzovsky:
>>>>>> [SNIP]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let me please know if I am still missing some point of yours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, I mean we need to be able to handle this for all drivers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For sure, but as i said above in my opinion we need to change
>>>>>> only for those drivers that don't use the _locked version.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that absolutely won't work.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the dma_fence is a contract between drivers, so you need the
>>>>> same calling convention between all drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Either we always call the callback with the lock held or we always
>>>>> call it without the lock, but sometimes like that and sometimes
>>>>> otherwise won't work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure I fully understand what problems this will cause but
>>>> anyway, then we are back to irq_work. We cannot embed irq_work as
>>>> union within dma_fenc's cb_list
>>>> because it's already reused as timestamp and as rcu head after the
>>>> fence is signaled. So I will do it within drm_scheduler with single
>>>> irq_work per drm_sched_entity
>>>> as we discussed before.
>>>
>>> That won't work either. We free up the entity after the cleanup
>>> function. That's the reason we use the callback on the job in the
>>> first place.
>>
>>
>> Yep, missed it.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> We could overlead the cb structure in the job though.
>>
>>
>> I guess, since no one else is using this member it after the cb
>> executed.
>>
>> Andrey
>
>
> Attached a patch. Give it a try please, I tested it on my side and
> tried to generate the right conditions to trigger this code path by
> repeatedly submitting commands while issuing GPU reset to stop the
> scheduler and then killing command submissions process in the middle.
> But for some reason looks like the job_queue was always empty already
> at the time of entity kill.
It was trivial to trigger with the stress utility I've hacked together:
amdgpu_stress -b v 1g -b g 1g -c 1 2 1g 1k
Then while it is copying just cntrl+c to kill it.
The patch itself is:
Tested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Thanks,
Christian.
>
> Andrey
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrey
>>>>>
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-01 10:50 Lockdep spalt on killing a processes Christian König
2021-10-01 14:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-10-01 15:10 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-04 8:14 ` Christian König
2021-10-04 15:27 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-20 19:32 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-21 6:34 ` Christian König
2021-10-25 19:10 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-25 19:56 ` Christian König
2021-10-26 2:33 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-26 10:54 ` Christian König
2021-10-27 14:27 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-27 14:34 ` Christian König
2021-10-27 14:47 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-27 14:50 ` Christian König
2021-10-27 19:58 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-28 17:26 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-10-29 7:07 ` Christian König [this message]
2021-11-01 15:24 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6aa79474-e998-368b-bb53-b43f135f5a0c@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox