From: "Chen, Xiaogang" <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
To: Mukul Joshi <mukjoshi@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: felix.kuehling@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:24:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b030c5c-e290-410b-8e1a-e3b3418ac8f9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9697eb8f-bab6-482a-ad82-0939ea9e17bc@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5089 bytes --]
On 10/29/2024 10:01 AM, Mukul Joshi wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2024 5:40 PM, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
>> From: Xiaogang Chen<xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
>>
>> To allow user better understand the cause triggering runlist oversubscription.
>> No function change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang ChenXiaogang.Chen@amd.com
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c | 55 ++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> index 37930629edc5..e22be6da23b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>> #include "kfd_kernel_queue.h"
>> #include "kfd_priv.h"
>>
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT 1 << 0
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 1
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 2
>> +
>> static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int increment_bytes,
>> unsigned int buffer_size_bytes)
>> {
>> @@ -40,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int increment_bytes,
>>
>> static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>> unsigned int *rlib_size,
>> - bool *over_subscription)
>> + int *over_subscription)
>> {
>> unsigned int process_count, queue_count, compute_queue_count, gws_queue_count;
>> unsigned int map_queue_size;
>> @@ -58,17 +62,20 @@ static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>> * hws_max_conc_proc has been done in
>> * kgd2kfd_device_init().
>> */
>> - *over_subscription = false;
>> + *over_subscription = 0;
>>
>> if (node->max_proc_per_quantum > 1)
>> max_proc_per_quantum = node->max_proc_per_quantum;
>>
>> - if ((process_count > max_proc_per_quantum) ||
>> - compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm) ||
>> - gws_queue_count > 1) {
>> - *over_subscription = true;
>> + if (process_count > max_proc_per_quantum)
>> + *over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT;
>
> I think you want to use the Bitwise OR (|) and not the Logical OR (||)
> here. This will always set over_subscription to 1.
yes, actually should use |=.
Regards
Xiaogang
> Regards,
> Mukul
>
>> + if (compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm))
>> + *over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT;
>> + if (gws_queue_count > 1)
>> + *over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT;
>> +
>> + if (*over_subscription)
>> dev_dbg(dev, "Over subscribed runlist\n");
>> - }
>>
>> map_queue_size = pm->pmf->map_queues_size;
>> /* calculate run list ib allocation size */
>> @@ -89,7 +96,7 @@ static int pm_allocate_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>> unsigned int **rl_buffer,
>> uint64_t *rl_gpu_buffer,
>> unsigned int *rl_buffer_size,
>> - bool *is_over_subscription)
>> + int *is_over_subscription)
>> {
>> struct kfd_node *node = pm->dqm->dev;
>> struct device *dev = node->adev->dev;
>> @@ -134,7 +141,7 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>> struct qcm_process_device *qpd;
>> struct queue *q;
>> struct kernel_queue *kq;
>> - bool is_over_subscription;
>> + int is_over_subscription;
>>
>> rl_wptr = retval = processes_mapped = 0;
>>
>> @@ -212,16 +219,38 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>> dev_dbg(dev, "Finished map process and queues to runlist\n");
>>
>> if (is_over_subscription) {
>> - if (!pm->is_over_subscription)
>> - dev_warn(
>> + if (!pm->is_over_subscription) {
>> +
>> + if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT) {
>> + dev_warn(
>> dev,
>> - "Runlist is getting oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> + "process number is more than maximum number of processes that"
>> + " HWS can schedule concurrently. Runlist is getting"
>> + " oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT) {
>> + dev_warn(
>> + dev,
>> + "compute queue number is more than assigned compute queues."
>> + " Runlist is getting"
>> + " oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT) {
>> + dev_warn(
>> + dev,
>> + "compute queue for cooperative workgroup is more than allowed."
>> + " Runlist is getting"
>> + " oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> + }
>> + }
>> retval = pm->pmf->runlist(pm, &rl_buffer[rl_wptr],
>> *rl_gpu_addr,
>> alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t),
>> true);
>> }
>> - pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription;
>> + pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription ? true : false;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t); i++)
>> pr_debug("0x%2X ", rl_buffer[i]);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6361 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 21:40 [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription Xiaogang.Chen
2024-10-29 15:01 ` Mukul Joshi
2024-10-29 16:24 ` Chen, Xiaogang [this message]
2024-11-06 0:31 ` Felix Kuehling
2024-11-06 17:21 ` Chen, Xiaogang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b030c5c-e290-410b-8e1a-e3b3418ac8f9@amd.com \
--to=xiaogang.chen@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=mukjoshi@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox