AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Xiaogang" <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
To: Mukul Joshi <mukjoshi@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: felix.kuehling@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:24:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b030c5c-e290-410b-8e1a-e3b3418ac8f9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9697eb8f-bab6-482a-ad82-0939ea9e17bc@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5089 bytes --]


On 10/29/2024 10:01 AM, Mukul Joshi wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2024 5:40 PM, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
>> From: Xiaogang Chen<xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
>>
>> To allow user better understand the cause triggering runlist oversubscription.
>> No function change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang ChenXiaogang.Chen@amd.com
>> ---
>>   .../gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c   | 55 ++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> index 37930629edc5..e22be6da23b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>>   #include "kfd_kernel_queue.h"
>>   #include "kfd_priv.h"
>>   
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT 1 << 0
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 1
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 2
>> +
>>   static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int increment_bytes,
>>   				unsigned int buffer_size_bytes)
>>   {
>> @@ -40,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int increment_bytes,
>>   
>>   static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>>   				unsigned int *rlib_size,
>> -				bool *over_subscription)
>> +				int *over_subscription)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int process_count, queue_count, compute_queue_count, gws_queue_count;
>>   	unsigned int map_queue_size;
>> @@ -58,17 +62,20 @@ static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>>   	 * hws_max_conc_proc has been done in
>>   	 * kgd2kfd_device_init().
>>   	 */
>> -	*over_subscription = false;
>> +	*over_subscription = 0;
>>   
>>   	if (node->max_proc_per_quantum > 1)
>>   		max_proc_per_quantum = node->max_proc_per_quantum;
>>   
>> -	if ((process_count > max_proc_per_quantum) ||
>> -	    compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm) ||
>> -	    gws_queue_count > 1) {
>> -		*over_subscription = true;
>> +	if (process_count > max_proc_per_quantum)
>> +		*over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT;
>
> I think you want to use the Bitwise OR (|) and not the Logical OR (||) 
> here. This will always set over_subscription to 1.

yes, actually should use |=.

Regards

Xiaogang

> Regards,
> Mukul
>
>> +	if (compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm))
>> +		*over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT;
>> +	if (gws_queue_count > 1)
>> +		*over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT;
>> +
>> +	if (*over_subscription)
>>   		dev_dbg(dev, "Over subscribed runlist\n");
>> -	}
>>   
>>   	map_queue_size = pm->pmf->map_queues_size;
>>   	/* calculate run list ib allocation size */
>> @@ -89,7 +96,7 @@ static int pm_allocate_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>>   				unsigned int **rl_buffer,
>>   				uint64_t *rl_gpu_buffer,
>>   				unsigned int *rl_buffer_size,
>> -				bool *is_over_subscription)
>> +				int *is_over_subscription)
>>   {
>>   	struct kfd_node *node = pm->dqm->dev;
>>   	struct device *dev = node->adev->dev;
>> @@ -134,7 +141,7 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>>   	struct qcm_process_device *qpd;
>>   	struct queue *q;
>>   	struct kernel_queue *kq;
>> -	bool is_over_subscription;
>> +	int is_over_subscription;
>>   
>>   	rl_wptr = retval = processes_mapped = 0;
>>   
>> @@ -212,16 +219,38 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>>   	dev_dbg(dev, "Finished map process and queues to runlist\n");
>>   
>>   	if (is_over_subscription) {
>> -		if (!pm->is_over_subscription)
>> -			dev_warn(
>> +		if (!pm->is_over_subscription) {
>> +
>> +			if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT) {
>> +				dev_warn(
>>   				dev,
>> -				"Runlist is getting oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +				"process number is more than maximum number of processes that"
>> +				" HWS can schedule concurrently. Runlist is getting"
>> +				" oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT) {
>> +				dev_warn(
>> +				dev,
>> +				"compute queue number is more than assigned compute queues."
>> +				" Runlist is getting"
>> +				" oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT) {
>> +				dev_warn(
>> +				dev,
>> +				"compute queue for cooperative workgroup is more than allowed."
>> +				" Runlist is getting"
>> +				" oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +			}
>> +		}
>>   		retval = pm->pmf->runlist(pm, &rl_buffer[rl_wptr],
>>   					*rl_gpu_addr,
>>   					alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t),
>>   					true);
>>   	}
>> -	pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription;
>> +	pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription ? true : false;
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t); i++)
>>   		pr_debug("0x%2X ", rl_buffer[i]);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6361 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 21:40 [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription Xiaogang.Chen
2024-10-29 15:01 ` Mukul Joshi
2024-10-29 16:24   ` Chen, Xiaogang [this message]
2024-11-06  0:31 ` Felix Kuehling
2024-11-06 17:21   ` Chen, Xiaogang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b030c5c-e290-410b-8e1a-e3b3418ac8f9@amd.com \
    --to=xiaogang.chen@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=mukjoshi@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox