AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukul Joshi <mukjoshi@amd.com>
To: "Xiaogang.Chen" <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: felix.kuehling@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:01:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9697eb8f-bab6-482a-ad82-0939ea9e17bc@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028214014.59940-1-xiaogang.chen@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4812 bytes --]


On 10/28/2024 5:40 PM, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
> From: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
>
> To allow user better understand the cause triggering runlist oversubscription.
> No function change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen Xiaogang.Chen@amd.com
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c   | 55 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
> index 37930629edc5..e22be6da23b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>  #include "kfd_kernel_queue.h"
>  #include "kfd_priv.h"
>  
> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT 1 << 0
> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 1
> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 2
> +
>  static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int increment_bytes,
>  				unsigned int buffer_size_bytes)
>  {
> @@ -40,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int increment_bytes,
>  
>  static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>  				unsigned int *rlib_size,
> -				bool *over_subscription)
> +				int *over_subscription)
>  {
>  	unsigned int process_count, queue_count, compute_queue_count, gws_queue_count;
>  	unsigned int map_queue_size;
> @@ -58,17 +62,20 @@ static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>  	 * hws_max_conc_proc has been done in
>  	 * kgd2kfd_device_init().
>  	 */
> -	*over_subscription = false;
> +	*over_subscription = 0;
>  
>  	if (node->max_proc_per_quantum > 1)
>  		max_proc_per_quantum = node->max_proc_per_quantum;
>  
> -	if ((process_count > max_proc_per_quantum) ||
> -	    compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm) ||
> -	    gws_queue_count > 1) {
> -		*over_subscription = true;
> +	if (process_count > max_proc_per_quantum)
> +		*over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT;

I think you want to use the Bitwise OR (|) and not the Logical OR (||) here. This will always set over_subscription to 1.

Regards,

Mukul

> +	if (compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm))
> +		*over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT;
> +	if (gws_queue_count > 1)
> +		*over_subscription = *over_subscription || OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT;
> +
> +	if (*over_subscription)
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "Over subscribed runlist\n");
> -	}
>  
>  	map_queue_size = pm->pmf->map_queues_size;
>  	/* calculate run list ib allocation size */
> @@ -89,7 +96,7 @@ static int pm_allocate_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>  				unsigned int **rl_buffer,
>  				uint64_t *rl_gpu_buffer,
>  				unsigned int *rl_buffer_size,
> -				bool *is_over_subscription)
> +				int *is_over_subscription)
>  {
>  	struct kfd_node *node = pm->dqm->dev;
>  	struct device *dev = node->adev->dev;
> @@ -134,7 +141,7 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>  	struct qcm_process_device *qpd;
>  	struct queue *q;
>  	struct kernel_queue *kq;
> -	bool is_over_subscription;
> +	int is_over_subscription;
>  
>  	rl_wptr = retval = processes_mapped = 0;
>  
> @@ -212,16 +219,38 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct packet_manager *pm,
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "Finished map process and queues to runlist\n");
>  
>  	if (is_over_subscription) {
> -		if (!pm->is_over_subscription)
> -			dev_warn(
> +		if (!pm->is_over_subscription) {
> +
> +			if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT) {
> +				dev_warn(
>  				dev,
> -				"Runlist is getting oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
> +				"process number is more than maximum number of processes that"
> +				" HWS can schedule concurrently. Runlist is getting"
> +				" oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
> +			}
> +
> +			if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT) {
> +				dev_warn(
> +				dev,
> +				"compute queue number is more than assigned compute queues."
> +				" Runlist is getting"
> +				" oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
> +			}
> +
> +			if (is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT) {
> +				dev_warn(
> +				dev,
> +				"compute queue for cooperative workgroup is more than allowed."
> +				" Runlist is getting"
> +				" oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
> +			}
> +		}
>  		retval = pm->pmf->runlist(pm, &rl_buffer[rl_wptr],
>  					*rl_gpu_addr,
>  					alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t),
>  					true);
>  	}
> -	pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription;
> +	pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription ? true : false;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t); i++)
>  		pr_debug("0x%2X ", rl_buffer[i]);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5613 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 21:40 [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription Xiaogang.Chen
2024-10-29 15:01 ` Mukul Joshi [this message]
2024-10-29 16:24   ` Chen, Xiaogang
2024-11-06  0:31 ` Felix Kuehling
2024-11-06 17:21   ` Chen, Xiaogang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9697eb8f-bab6-482a-ad82-0939ea9e17bc@amd.com \
    --to=mukjoshi@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=xiaogang.chen@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox