From: "Chen, Xiaogang" <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
To: Philip Yang <yangp@amd.com>, Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Felix.Kuehling@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Fix false positive queue buffer free warning
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:29:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97a3c5de-3a66-435e-8b4c-72c87473d88f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d60c36a-523b-5bf0-bea9-7d5fbdecf93e@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3186 bytes --]
On 10/20/2025 11:34 AM, Philip Yang wrote:
>
> On 2025-10-20 11:59, Chen, Xiaogang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/2025 9:30 AM, Philip Yang wrote:
>>> Only show warning message if process mm is still alive when queue
>>> buffer is freed.
>>>
>>> If kfd_lookup_process_by_mm return NULL, means the process is already
>>> exited and mm is gone, it is fine to free queue buffer.
>>>
>>> Fixes: b049504e211e ("drm/amdkfd: Validate user queue svm memory
>>> residency")
>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Yang<Philip.Yang@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 5 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> index 4d4a47313f5b..d1b2f8525f80 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> @@ -2487,7 +2487,9 @@ svm_range_unmap_from_cpu(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> struct svm_range *prange,
>>> bool unmap_parent;
>>> uint32_t i;
>>> - if (atomic_read(&prange->queue_refcount)) {
>>> + p = kfd_lookup_process_by_mm(mm);
>>
>> p->mm is null, not p because driver set p->mm to null. But still
>> prange->queue_refcount is ref of queues from this prange. If app
>> unmap this prange app should have destroyed the queues associated
>> with this prange already. If not, it is not driver issue.
>>
> right, we still pr_warn if app unmap the prange with queue_refcount
> not zero, p is not NULL for this case.
>>
>> I think driver should send this warning anyway to indicate there are
>> queues not destroyed by app before app unmap the prange.
>>
> if app killed or segmentation fault, mm is gone first, then queue is
> destroyed in scheduled release wq, then exit_mmap unmap the prange
> with queue_refcount not zero, p is NULL, should not pr_warn, because
> warning message "Freeing queue vital buffer...." is not related to app
> segmentation fault or killed.
Then can we put pqm_uninit at kfd_process_notifier_release_internal as
you did at second patch with kfd_process_dequeue_from_all_devices:
destroy queue when mm is gone?
And if this is for the cases "app got killed or segment fault" how
important user should not see this warning message? Something was wrong
already anyway.
My thought is that prange->queue_refcount means queue number associated
with prange. If it got unmap the queues should be destroyed already, if
not, something was wrong somewhere, then need send this warning message.
Regards
Xiaogang
>
> Regards,
>
> Philip
>
>> It is an app race condition, not driver.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Xiaogang
>>
>>> +
>>> + if (p && atomic_read(&prange->queue_refcount)) {
>>> int r;
>>> pr_warn("Freeing queue vital buffer 0x%lx, queue
>>> evicted\n",
>>> @@ -2497,7 +2499,6 @@ svm_range_unmap_from_cpu(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> struct svm_range *prange,
>>> pr_debug("failed %d to quiesce KFD queues\n", r);
>>> }
>>> - p = kfd_lookup_process_by_mm(mm);
>>> if (!p)
>>> return;
>>> svms = &p->svms;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 76493 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 14:30 [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Fix false positive queue buffer free warning Philip Yang
2025-10-20 14:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/amdkfd: Dequeue user queues when process mm released Philip Yang
2025-10-20 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/amdkfd: Fix false positive queue buffer free warning Chen, Xiaogang
2025-10-20 16:24 ` Kim, Jonathan
2025-10-20 17:33 ` Chen, Xiaogang
2025-10-20 17:45 ` Kim, Jonathan
2025-10-20 17:51 ` Chen, Xiaogang
2025-10-20 16:34 ` Philip Yang
2025-10-20 17:29 ` Chen, Xiaogang [this message]
2025-10-22 18:13 ` Philip Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97a3c5de-3a66-435e-8b4c-72c87473d88f@amd.com \
--to=xiaogang.chen@amd.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=yangp@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox